Balanced scorecard perspective on change and performance: A study of selected Indian companies

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 24, Issue , 2011, Pages 754-768

  Farooq, Ayesha ^a   Hussain, Zareen ^a  

^a ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Change management; Organizational performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 81055129561     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.043     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (63)

1. Neely A, Adams C., Kennerley M. The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2002.
2. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive Performance. Harvard Business Review 1992;70(1):172-180.
3. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press;1996.
4. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2004.
5. Pierce J, Delbecq A. Organizational Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation. Academy of Management Review 1977:27-37.
6. Stickland F. The Dynamics of Change. London: Routledge; 1998.
7. Morgan G. Reading the Waves of Change. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers;1989.
8. March JG, Simon H. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1958.
9. Cyert RM, March J. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. NJ: Prentice- Hall; 1963.
10. Hedberg B. How Organizations Learn and Unlearn. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck W. editors. Handbook of organizational design, England: Oxford University Press; 1981.
11. Levitt B, March J. Organizational Learning. Annual Rev. Sociology 1988;14:319-340.
12. McDevitt R, Giapponi C., Solomon N. Strategy revitalization in academe: a balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Educational Management 2008;22(1):32-47.
13. Narrett A. Keeping Score. American Gas 2008:22-25.
14. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work. Harvard Business Review 1993; September- October:134-147.
15. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive Performance. Harvard Business Review 1992;70(1):172-180.
16. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2000.
17. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press;1996.
18. Niven P. Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
19. Niven P. Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
20. Bose S, Thomas K. Applying the balanced scorecard for better performance of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2007; 8(4):653-654.
21. Levy N. Managing High Technology and Innovation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall;1998.
22. Kaplan RS, Norton D. Strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy& Leadership 1996(b);24(5):18-25.
23. Niven P. Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
24. Van De Ven AH, Poole MS. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 1995;20(3):510-540.
25. Struckman CK., Yammario FJ. Organizational change: A categorization scheme and response model with readiness factors. Research in organizational change and development 2003;14:1-50. (Pubitemid 137640121)
26. Lewin K. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper; 1951.
27. Marrow AJ. Making management human. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1957.
28. Dent EB, Goldberg SG. Challenging resistance to change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences 1999;35(25):25-41.
29. George JM, Jones GR. Towards a process model of individual change in organizations. Human Relations 2001;54(4):419-444.
30. Lewin K. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper; 1951.
31. Dent EB, Goldberg SG. Challenging resistance to change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences 1999;35(25):25-41.
32. Robbins SP. Organizational Behavior. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India; 2001.
33. Watchtel TR, Hartford CE, Hughes JA. Building a balanced scorecard for a burns center. Burns 1999;25(5): 431-437. (Pubitemid 29351989)
34. Lawrence S, Sharma U. Commodification of education and academic labor- using balanced scorecard in a university setting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2002;13(5/6):661-677. (Pubitemid 36127250)
35. Littler K, Aisthrope P, Hudson R, Keaysey K. A new approach to linking strategy formulation and stratefy implementation: an example from the Uk banking sector. International Journal of Information Management 2009;20(6):411-428.
36. Thomas R, Gable M, Dickinson R. An application of balanced scorecard in retailing. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 1999;9(1):41-67.
37. Niven P. Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
38. Mintrop H, MacLellan A. School improvement plans in elementary and middle schools on probation. Elementary School Journal 2002;102(4): 275-300.
39. Duke DL. Turning schools around. Education Week 2007;26(4): 35-37.
40. McColskey W, Monrad DM. Assisting low-performing schools in the Southeast', International Journal of Educational Police, Research and Practice 2004; 4(4):3-24.
41. Mintrop, H. and Trujillo, T. (2005) "Corrective action in low performing schools: lessons for NCLB implementation from firstgeneration accountability systems", Education Policy Analysis Archives 13(8): 1-30.
42. Brady RC. Can Failing Schools be Fixed? Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Washington, DC; 2003.
43. Wang MC, Manning J. Turning Around Low-performing Schools: The Case of the Washington', DC Schools, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, DC (Report 143); 2000.
44. Borman GD, Rachuba L, Datnow A, Alberg, M, Mac Iver M, Stringfield S. Four Models of School Improvement: Successes and Challenges in Reforming Low-performing, High-poverty Title I Schools. Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk (CRESPAR), Baltimore, MD (Report No. 48); 2000.
45. Cibulka JG. Educational bankruptcy, takeovers, and reconstitution of failing schools. In: Boyd, WL and Miretzky D, editors. American Educational Governance on Trial: Change and Challenges, National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, IL; 2003, p.249-70.
46. Kowal JM, Hassel EA Turnarounds with New Leaders and Staff. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), Naperville, IL; 2005.
47. Phenix D, Siegel D, Zaltsman A, Fruchter N. A forced march for failing schools: lessons from the New York City Chancellor's District. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 2005;13(40): 1-21.
48. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard- measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 2002:71-79.
49. Ittner CD. Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence. Accounting and Business Research 2008;38(3):261-272.
50. Abernethy MA, Lillis A. The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1995;20:241-258.
51. Ittner CD, Larcker DF. Total Quality Management and the Choice of Information and Reward System, Journal of Accounting Research 1995;33:1-34.
52. Chenhall RH. Reliance on Manufacturing Performance Measures, Total Quality Management and Organizational Performance. Management Accounting Research 1997; 8: 187-206. (Pubitemid 127169084)
53. Perera S, Harrison G, Pole, M. Customer- focused Manufacturing Strategy and the use of operations- based non- financial performance measures: A research note. Accounting Organizations and Society 1997;22: 557-572. (Pubitemid 127159912)
54. Ittner CD, Larcker DF, Meyer MW. Subjectivity and the weighing of performance measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard. The Accounting Review 2003;78(3):725-758. (Pubitemid 36989977)
55. Kaynak H. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management 2003;21:405-435.
56. Said AA, HassabElnaby HR, Wier B. An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of non- financial measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 2003;15:193-223.
57. Davis S, Albright T. An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research 2004;15(2):135-153. (Pubitemid 38773451)
58. Buhovac AR, Slapnicar S. The Role of Balanced, Strategic, Cascaded and Aligned Performance Measurement in Enhancing firm performance. Economic and Business Review for Central and South- Eastern Europe 2007; 9(1):47-74.
59. Yeo RK. (Re)viewing Problem-Based Learning: An exploratory study on the perceptions of its applicability to the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology 2007; 22(4);369-391.
60. Amir E, Lev, B. Value relevance of non-financial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting & Economics 1996; (2):3-30. (Pubitemid 126164487)
61. Ittner CD, Larcker DF. Are non financial measures leading indicators or financial performance? A study of customer satisfaction. Journal of accounting research 1998;36:1-35. (Pubitemid 128665972)
62. Banker RD, Potter G, Srinivasan D. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes non- financial performance measures. The Accounting Review 2000;75(1):65-93.
63. Narrett Z. (2008, August). Keeping Score. American Gas 2008, 90(7), 22-25.