School improvement plans in elementary and middle schools on probation

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2000, Pages

  Mintrop, Heinrich ^a   MacLellan, Ann Merck ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18144432213     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ascher, C., Ikeda, K., & Fruchter, N. (1997). Schools on notice: A policy study of New York State's 1996-1997 schools under registration review process. New York: New York University.
2. Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Biott, C., Easen, P., & Atkins, M. (1994). Written planning and school development: Biding time or making time. In D. H. Hargreaves & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Development for school improvement (pp. 80-90). New York: Cassell.
4. Broadhead, P., Cuckle, P., Hodgson, J., & Dunford, J. (1996). Improving primary schools through school development planning: Building a vision, exploring the reality. Educational Management and Administration, 24(3), 277-290.
5. Clark, T. A., & McCarthy, D. P. (1983). School improvement in New York City: The evolution of a project. Educational Researcher, 12(4), 17-24.
6. Conley, D. T. (1992, April). Strategic planning in America's schools: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
7. Conley, D. T. (1993, April). Strategic planning in practice: An analysis of purposes, goals, and procedures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
8. Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Elmore, R., Abelmann, C., & Fuhrman, S. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65-98). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
10. Elmore, R., & McLaughlin, M. (1988). Steady work. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
11. Firestone, W. A., Mayrowetz, D., & Fairman, J. (1997, April). Rethinking high stakes: External obligation in assessment policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
12. Fuhrman, S. (Ed.). (1993). Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Guskey, T. (Ed.). (1994). High-stakes performance assessment: Perspectives on Kentucky's reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
15. Hanushek, E. A. (1994). Making schools work: Improving performance and controlling costs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
16. Levine, D. U., & Leibert, R. E. (1987). Improving school improvement plans. Elementary School Journal, 87(4), 397-412.
17. Lezotte, L. W., & Bancroft, B. A. (1985). School improvement based on effective schools research: A promising approach for economically disadvantaged and minority students. Journal of Negro Education, 54(3), 301-312.
18. Louis, K. S., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. London: Cassell.
19. Maryland State Department of Education Division of Planning Results and Information Management. (1997). Criteria for reconstitution. Baltimore: Maryland State Department of Education.
20. McDonald, J. P. (1996). Redesigning schools: Lessons for the 21st century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon.
22. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. Meyer & Associates (Eds.), Environments and organizations (pp. 71-97). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Mintrop, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of school reconstitution as a strategy to educate students placed at risk. In M. Sanders (Ed.), Schooling students placed at risk: Research, policy, and practice in the education of poor and minority adolescents (pp. 231-260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Mintrop, H., Curtis, K., King, B., & Plut-Pregelj, L. (2001, April). Organizational responses to probation: A report from seven schools on probation within the Maryland accountability system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
25. Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 41-74.
26. O'Day, J. A., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 250-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Quality counts 2001, a better balance: Standards, tests, and the tools to succeed. (2001, January 11). Education Week, 20(17).
28. Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Schein, E. (1991). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Senge, P. M. (1994). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
31. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). London: Falmer.
32. Tucker, M. S., & Codding, J. B. (1998). Standards for our schools: How to set them, measure them, and reach them. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Wallace, M. (1994). Towards a contingency approach to development planning in schools. In D. H. Hargreaves & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Development planning for school improvement (pp. 150-161). New York: Cassell.
35. Wirt, F. M., & Kirst, M. W. (1992). Schools in conflict: The politics of education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
36. Wong, K. K., Anagnostopoulos, D., & Rutledge, S. (1998, November). Accommodation and conflict: The implementation of Chicago's probation and reconstitution policies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, New York.