Facial Attractiveness

The Science of Social Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Little, Anthony C ^a   Perrett, David I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Facial beauty; Facial symmetry; Human face preferences; Physical attractiveness; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

EID: 80855160388     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333176.003.0010     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Alley, T. R. & Cunningham, M. R. (1991). Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychological Science 2, 123-125.
2. Apicella, C. L., Little, A. C. & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception 36, 1813-1820.
3. Baker, R. R. & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation and infidelity. London: Chapman & Hall.
4. Bakker, T. C. M., Künzler, R. & Mazzi, D. (1999). Condition-related mate-choice in sticklebacks. Nature 401, 234.
5. Barden, C. R., Ford, M. E., Jensen, A. & Salyer, K. (1989). Effects of craniofacial deformity in infancy on the quality of mother-infant interactions. Child Development 60, 819-824.
6. Berry, D. S. & Brownlow, S. (1989). Were the physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15, 266-279.
7. Berry, D. S. & McArthur, L. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, 312-323.
8. Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E. & Walster, G. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 7, 173-189.
9. Berscheid, E. & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 157-215. New York: Academic Press.
10. Bruce, V. & Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 77, 307-327.
11. Burley, N. (1986). Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. American Naturalist 127, 415-445.
12. Cash, T. F. & Kilcullen, R. N. (1985). The Aye of the Beholder-Susceptibility to Sexism and Beautyism in the Evaluation of Managerial Applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15, 591-605.
13. Chiu, R. K. & Babcock, R. D. (2002). The relative importance of facial attractiveness and gender in Hong Kong selection decisions. International Journal of Human Resource Management 13, 141-155.
14. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, 925-935.
15. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P. & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, 61-72.
16. Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P. & Druen, P. B. (1995). "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 261-279.
17. Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
18. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., Cooper, P. A., Penke, L., Feinberg, D. R. & Tiddeman, B. P. (2006). Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273, 1355-1360.
19. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Unger, L., Little, A. C. & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 33, 1420-1430.
20. Dermer, M. & Thiel, D. L. (1975). When beauty may fail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31, 1168-1176.
21. Dion, K., Berscheid, E. & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, 285-290.
22. Dion, K. K. & Berscheid, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness and peer perception among children. Sociometry 37, 1-12.
23. Downs, A. C. & Lyons, P. M. (1991). Natural observations of the links between attractiveness and initial legal judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 541-547.
24. Dufour, K. W. & Weatherhead, P. J. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and social dominance in captive male red-winged blackbirds. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 42, 71-76.
25. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G. & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110, 109-128.
26. Elder, G. H. J. (1969). Appearance and education in marriage mobility. American Sociological Review 34, 519-533.
27. Enlow, D. M. (1982). Handbook of facial growth. Philadelphia: Saunders.
28. Enquist, M. & Arak, A. (1993). Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature 361, 446-448.
29. Enquist, M. & Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372, 169-172.
30. Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin 111, 304-341.
31. Folstad, I. & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist 139, 603-622.
32. Ford, C. S. & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behaviour. New York: Harper & Row.
33. Frost, P. (1994). Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79, 507-514.
34. Galton, F. J. (1878). Composite portraits. Nature 18, 97-100.
35. Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 275, 991-1000.
36. Gomendio, M., Cassinello, J. & Roldan, E. R. S. (2000). A comparative study of ejaculate traits in three endangered ungulates with different levels of inbreeding: fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of reproductive and genetic stress. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 267, 875-882.
37. Goren, C. C., Sarty, M. & Wu, P. Y. K. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face like stimuli by newborn infants. Paediatrics 56, 544-549.
38. Grammer, K. & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human(Homo sapiens)facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108, 233-242.
39. Halberstadt, J. & Rhodes, G. (2003). It's not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10, 149-156.
40. Hillgarth, N. & Wingfield, J. C. (1997). Testosterone and Immunosuppression in vertebrates: implications for parasite mediated sexual selection. In N. E. Beckage(Ed.). Parasites and Pathogens. New York: Chapman & Hall.
41. Holmes, S. J. & Hatch, C. E. (1938). Personal appearance as related to scholastic records and marriage selection in college women. Human Biology 10, 65-76.
42. Hume, D. (1757). Four dissertations. IV: Of the standard of taste. London: Millar.
43. Jansson, L., Forkman, B. & Enquist, M. (2002). Experimental evidence of receiver bias for symmetry. Animal Behaviour 63, 617-621.
44. Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H. & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition 40, 1-19.
45. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: evidence for a hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior 22, 251-267.
46. Johnstone, R. A. (1994). Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Nature 372, 172-175.
47. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M. & Little, A. C. (2007a). The role of symmetry in attraction to average faces. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 1273-1277.
48. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Conway, C. A., Welling, L. L. M. & Smith, F. (2007b). Sensation seeking and men's face preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 439-446.
49. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R. & Smith, M. J. L. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior 37, 78-84.
50. Jones, D. & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature 4, 271-296.
51. Kanda, N., Tsuchida, T. & Tamaki, K. (1996). Testosterone inhibits immunoglobulin production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 106, 410-415.
52. Keating, C. F. (1985). Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly 48, 61-70.
53. Kowner, R. (1996). Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22, 662-675.
54. Krebs, D. & Adinolfi, A. A. (1975). Physical attractiveness, social relations, and personality style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31, 245-253.
55. Lagesen, K. & Folstad, I. (1998). Antler asymmetry and immunity in reindeer. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 44, 135-142.
56. Langlois, J., Ritter, J., Casey, J. & Solwin, D. (1995). Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Developmental Psychology 31, 464-472.
57. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallamm, M. & Smoot, M. 2000 Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 126, 390-423.
58. Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A. & Vaughn, L. S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology 27, 79-84.
59. Langlois, J. H. & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science 1, 115-121.
60. Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Casey, R. J., Ritter, J. M., Riser-Danner, L. A. & Jenkins, V. Y. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psychology 23, 363-369.
61. Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A. & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces. Psychological Science 5, 214-220.
62. Law-Smith, M. J., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., Boothroyd, L. G., Durrani, S. J., Stirrat, M. R., Whiten, S., Pitman, R. M. & Hillier, S. G. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273, 135-140.
63. Light, L. L., Hollander, S. & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981). Why attractive people are harder to remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 7, 269-276.
64. Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L. & Marlowe, F. W. (2007a). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274, 3113-3117.
65. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 268, 39-44.
66. Little, A. C., Cohen, D. L., Jones, B. C. & Belsky, J. (2007b). Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61, 967-973.
67. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M. & Jones, B. C. (2005). Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 272, 2283-2287.
68. Little, A. C. & Hancock, P. J. B. (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology 93, 451-464.
69. Little, A. C. & Jones, B. C. (2003). Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270, 1759-1763.
70. Little, A. C. & Jones, B. C. (2006). Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 273, 3093-3099.
71. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. (2007c). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology 76, 209-216.
72. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 269, 1095-1100.
73. Little, A. C. & Mannion, H. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Animal Behaviour 72, 981-987.
74. Ludwig, W. (1932). Das Rechts-links problem im tierreich und beim menschen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
75. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D. & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). Developmental stability, ejaculate size, and sperm quality in men. Evolution and Human Behavior 19, 273-282.
76. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H. & Leinster, S. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior 18, 223-236.
77. Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L. & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 11-21.
78. McArthur, L. A., K. (1983-1984). Impressions of baby-faced adults. Social Cognition 2, 315-342.
79. McArthur, L. Z. & Berry, D. S. (1987). Cross-cultural agreement in perceptions of babyfaced adults. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 18, 165-192.
80. Mealey, L., Bridgestock, R. & Townsend, G. (1999). Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76, 151-158.
81. Mitton, J. B. & Grant, M. C. (1984). Associations among proteins heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15, 479-499.
82. Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review. American Naturalist 149, 916-942.
83. Møller, A. P., Christe, P. & Lux, E. (1999). Parasitism, host immune function, and sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 74, 3-20.
84. Møller, A. P., Soler, M. & Thornhill, R. (1995). Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology 16, 207-219.
85. Møller, A. P. & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, Developmental Stability, and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Møller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. (1998a). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta-analysis. American Naturalist 151, 174-192.
87. Møller, A. P. & Thornhill, R. (1998b). Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Animal Behaviour 55, 1507-1515.
88. Penton-Voak, I. S. & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 25, 229-241.
89. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions, and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 268, 1617-1623.
90. Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically-further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior 21, 39-48.
91. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K. & Minamisawa, R. (1999a). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 399, 741-742.
92. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I. & Pierce, J. (1999b). Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in attractiveness judgements. Current Psychology 18, 104-117.
93. Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A. & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 20, 295-307.
94. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L. & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884-887.
95. Perrett, D. I., May, K. A. & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature 368, 239-242.
96. Petrie, M. (1994). Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371, 598-599.
97. Petrie, M., Halliday, T. & Sanders, C. (1991). Peahens prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour 41, 323-331.
98. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 57, 199-226.
99. Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A. & Simmons, L. W. (2003a). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270, S93-S95.
100. Rhodes, G., Hickford, C. & Jeffery, L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive. British Journal of Psychology 91, 125-140.
101. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G. & Nakayama, K. (2003b). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 14, 558-566.
102. Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 5, 659-669.
103. Rhodes, G., Sumich, A. & Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science 10, 52-58.
104. Rhodes, G. & Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychological Science 7, 105-110.
105. Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R. & Akamatsu, S. (2001a). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western populations: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30, 611-625.
106. Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A. & McKay, R. (2001b). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behaviour 22, 31-46.
107. Riggio, R. & Woll, S. 1984 The role of non-verbal and physical attractiveness in the selection of dating partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relations 1, 347-357.
108. Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Gosling, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Carter, V., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. & Petrie, M. 2005 MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 26, 213-226.
109. Samuels, C. A., Butterworth, G., Roberts, T., Graupner, L. & Hoyle, G. 1994 Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry. Perception 23, 823-831.
110. Scheib, J. E. 2001 Context-specific mate choice criteria: women's trade-offs in the contexts of long-term and extra-pair mateships. Personal Relationships 8, 371-389.
111. Scheib, J. E., Gangestad, S. W. & Thornhill, R. 1999 Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues to good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 266, 1913-1917.
112. Sigall, H. & Ostrove, N. 1975 Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridical judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31, 410-414.
113. Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D. & Berscheid, E. 1977 Social perception and interpersonal behaviour: On the self--fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 656-666.
114. Swaddle, J. P. & Cuthill, I. C. 1995 Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 261, 111-116.
115. Swaddle, J. P. & Reierson, G. W. 2003 Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 269, 2285-2289.
116. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1993 Human facial beauty: averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature 4, 237-269.
117. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1994 Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behaviour. Psychological Science 5, 297-302.
118. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1999 Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 452-460.
119. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 2006 Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 27, 131-144.
120. Valen, L. V. 1962 A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16, 125-142.
121. Valentine, T., Darling, S. & Donnelly, M. 2004 Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 482-487.
122. Waitt, C. & Little, A. C. 2006 Preferences for symmetry in conspecific facial shape among Macaca mulatta. International Journal of Primatology 27, 133-145.
123. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D. & Rottman, L. 1966 Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, 508-516.
124. Wedekind, C. 1992 Detailed information about parasites as revealed by sexual ornamentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 147, 169-174.
125. Yesilova, Z., Ozata, M., Kocar, I. H., Turan, M., Pekel, A., Sengul, A. & Ozdemir, I. C. 2000 The effects of gonadotropin treatment on the immunological features of male patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 85, 66-70.
126. Zahavi, A. 1975 Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53, 205-214.
127. Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. & Baron, R. M. 1983 Toward and ecological approach to social perception. Psychological Review 90, 215-238.