Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 3519-3524

  Ferri, Francesca ^a   Riggio, Lucia ^a   Gallese, Vittorio ^a,b   Costantini, Marcello ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Affordance; Object perception; Peripersonal space

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PERSONAL SPACE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80755140142     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anelli F., Nicoletti R., Borghi A.M. Categorization and action: What about object consistence?. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 2010, 133:203-211.
2. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 577-660.
3. Binkofski F., Dohle C., Posse S., Stephan K.M., Hefter H., Seitz R.J., Freund H.J. Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 1998, 50:1253-1259.
4. Borghi A.M., Bonfiglioli C., Lugli L., Ricciardelli P., Rubichi S., Nicoletti R. Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neuroscience Letters 2007, 411:17-21.
5. Borghi A.M., Riggio L. Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances. Brain Research 2009, 1253:117-128.
6. Bub D.N., Masson M.E. Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:341-358.
7. Bub D.N., Masson M.E., Cree G.S. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 2008, 106:27-58.
8. Caramazza A., Hillis A.E., Rapp B.C., Romani C. The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990, 7:161-189.
9. Cavina-Pratesi C., Monaco S., Fattori P., Galletti C., McAdam T.D., Quinlan D.J., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:10306-10323.
10. Costantini M., Ambrosini E., Scorolli C., Borghi A. When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:302-308.
11. Costantini M., Ambrosini E., Tieri G., Sinigaglia C., Committeri G. Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 207:95-103.
12. Duncker K. On problem solving. Psychological Monographs 1945, 58.
13. Ellis R., Tucker M. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. The British Journal of Psychology 2000, 91(Pt 4):451-471.
14. Farah M.J., McClelland J.L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1991, 120:339.
15. Gallese V. The inner sense of action. Agency and motor representations. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2000, 7:23-40.
16. Gallese V., Lakoff G. The Brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22:455.
17. Gallivan J.P., Cavina-Pratesi C., Culham J.C. Is that within reach? fMRI reveals that the human superior parieto-occipital cortex encodes objects reachable by the hand. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:4381-4391.
18. Gerlach C. Category-specificity in visual object recognition. Cognition 2009, 111:281-301.
19. Glover S., Rosenbaum D., Graham J., Dixon P. Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 154:103.
20. Gonnerman L.M., Andersen E.S., Devlin J.T., Kempler D., Seidenberg M.S. Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Language 1997, 57:254.
21. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage 1997, 6:231-236.
22. Grezes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 17:2735-2740.
23. Jeannerod M. The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements 1988, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Jeannerod M., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G., Sakata H. Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neurosciences 1995, 18:314-320.
25. Lambon Ralph M.A., Graham K.S., Patterson K., Hodges J.R. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evidence from concept definitions by patients with semantic dementia. Brain and Language 1999, 70:309.
26. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. (C. Smith, 1962, Trans.). Tel Gallimard. Paris: Routledge Classics.
27. Paivio A. Imagery and verbal processes 1971, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London, (Chapter Chapter).
28. Paivio A. Mental representations: A dual coding approach 1986, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Rapp B.C., Hillis A.E., Caramazza A. The role of representations in cognitive theory: More on multiple semantics and the agnosias. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1993, 10:235-249.
30. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. Mirrors in the brain. How our minds share actions and emotions 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Shinkareva S.V., Malave V.L., Mason R.A., Mitchell T.M., Just M.A. Commonality of neural representations of words and pictures. NeuroImage 2011, 54:2418.
32. ter Horst A., van Lier R., Steenbergen B. Spatial dependency of action simulation. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 212:635.
33. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
34. Tucker M., Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:769-800.
35. Tucker M., Ellis R. Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica 2004, 116:185-203.
36. Vainio L., Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M., Ottoboni G. On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition 2008, 108:444-465.
37. Warrington E.K., McCarthy R.A. Categories of knowledge. Brain 1987, 110:1273-1296.
38. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairment. Brain 1984, 107:829-853.
39. Yang S.-J., Beilock S.L. Seeing and doing: Ability to act moderates orientation effects in object perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 64:639.
40. Yoon E.Y., Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. The paired-object affordance effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:812.
41. Zwaan R.A., Taylor L.J. Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:1.