Categorization and action: What about object consistence?

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 203-211

  Anelli, Filomena ^a   Nicoletti, Roberto ^a   Borghi, Anna M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

Action; Categorization; Embodied cognition; Motor simulation; Object consistence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HAND STRENGTH; HARDNESS; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

CONCEPT FORMATION; CUES; HAND STRENGTH; HARDNESS; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74149089965     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bazzarin V., Borghi A.M., Tessari A., and Nicoletti R. Is a small apple more like an apple or more like a cherry?. In: Vosniadou S., and Kayser D. (Eds). Proceedings of the meeting of the European society of cognitive science, Delphi 2007 (2007), Erlbaum, London 83-88
2. Borghi A.M., Bonfiglioli C., Lugli L., Ricciardelli P., Rubichi S., and Nicoletti R. Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neuroscience Letters 411 (2007) 17-21
3. Borghi A.M., Bonfiglioli C., Ricciardelli P., Rubichi S., and Nicoletti R. Do we access object manipulability while we categorize? Evidence from reaction time studies. In: Schalley A.C., and Khlentzos D. (Eds). Mental states: Evolution, function, nature (2007), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 153-170
4. Brouwer A.M., Georgiou G., Glover S., and Castiello U. Adjusting reach to lift movements to sudden visible changes in target's weight. Experimental Brain Research 173 (2006) 629-636
5. Ehrsson H.H., Fagergren A., Jonsson T., Westling G., Johansson R.S., and Forssberg H. Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology 83 (2000) 528-536
6. Ellis A.E., and Oakes L.M. Infants flexible use different dimensions to categorize objects. Developmental Psychology 42 (2006) 1000-1011
7. Freina L., Baroni G., Borghi A.M., and Nicoletti R. Emotive concept-nouns and motor responses: Attraction or repulsion?. Memory and Cognition 37 (2009) 493-499
8. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., and Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 (1996) 593-609
9. Gallese V., and Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (1998) 493-501
10. Gerlach C. Category-specificity in visual object recognition. Cognition 111 (2009) 281-301
11. Gerlach C., Law I., Gade A., and Paulson O.B. Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition: A PET study. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 1693-1703
12. Gerlach C., Law I., and Paulson O.B. Structural similarity and category-specificity: A refined account. Neuropsychologia 42 (2004) 1543-1553
13. Gerlach C., Law I., and Paulson O.B. Shape configuration and category-specificity. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 1247-1260
14. Gibson E.J., and Walker A.S. Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Development 55 (1984) 453-460
15. Hommel B. Action control according to TEC (Theory of Event Coding). Psychological Research 73 (2009) 512-526
16. Humphreys G.W., and Forde E.M.E. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 453-509
17. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J., and Quinlan P.T. Cascade processed in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5 (1988) 67-103
18. Jeannerod M. Being oneself. Journal of Physiology-Paris 101 4-6 (2007) 161-168
19. Jones S.S., Smith L.B., and Landau B. Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. Child Development 62 (1991) 499-516
20. Kalish C.W., and Gelman S.A. On wooden pillows: Multiple classification and children's category-based inductions. Child Development 63 (1992) 1536-1557
21. Kourtzi Z., and Shiffrar M. Visual representation of malleable and rigid objects that deform as they rotate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 335-355
22. Landau B., Smith L.B., and Jones S.S. The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development 59 (1988) 299-321
23. Lloyd-Jones T.J., and Humphreys G.W. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory and Cognition 25 (1997) 18-35
24. Mandler J.M. How to build a baby II: Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 587-604
25. Masharov M., and Fischer M. Linguistic relativity: Does language help or hinder perception?. Current Biology 16 (2006) R289-R291
26. Panis S., Vangeneugden J., Op de Beeck H.P., and Wagemans J. The representation of subordinate shape similarity in human occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Vision 8 (2008) 1-15
27. Panis S., Vangeneugden J., and Wagemans J. Similarity, typicality, and category-level matching of morphed outlines of everyday objects. Perception 37 (2008) 1822-1849
28. Rizzolatti G., and Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 27 (2004) 169-192
29. Rochat P. Mouthing and grasping in neonates: Evidence for the early detection of what hard or soft substances afford for action. Infant Behavior and Development 10 (1987) 435-449
30. Santos L.R., Hauser M., and Spelke E. Recognition and categorization of biologically significant objects by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): The domain of food. Cognition 82 2 (2001) 127-155
31. Scorolli C., Borghi A.M., and Glenberg A.M. Language-induced motor activity in bimanual object lifting. Experimental Brain Research 193 (2009) 43-53
32. Smith L.B. Learning how to learn words: An associative crane. In: Golinkoff R.M., Hirsh-Pasek K., Bloom L., Smith L.B., Woodward A.L., Akhtar N., et al. (Eds). Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition (2000), Oxford University Press, New York
33. Smith L.B. Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 665-679
34. Snodgrass J.G., and Yuditsky T. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavioural Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 28 4 (1996) 516-536
35. Soja N.O.N. Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax. Cognitive Development 7 (1992) 29-45
36. Tucker M., and Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 8 (2001) 769-800
37. Vainio L., Symes E., Ellis R., Tucker M., and Ottoboni G. On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition 108 (2008) 444-465
38. VanRullen R., and Thorpe S.J. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects. Perception 30 (2001) 655-668
39. Yoshida H., and Smith L.B. Linguistic cues enhance the learning of perceptual cues. Psychological Science 16 2 (2005) 90-95