Customary international law as U.S. law: A critique of the revisionist and intermediate positions and a defense of the modern position

Notre Dame Law Review

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1495-1634

  Vazquez, Carlos M ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80555136761     PISSN: 07453515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Aaron Fellmeth, International Law and Foreign Laws in the U.S. State Legislatures, ASIL INSIGHTS (May 26, 2011), http://www.asil.org/pdfs/insights/ insightll0526.pdf.
2. Jess Bravin, Oklahoma Is Sued over Shariah Ban, WALL ST. J., Nov. 5, 2010, at A5
3. Carla Hinton, Measure Keeps Courts from Considering Sharia Law, OKLAHOMAN, Nov. 5, 2010, at 1A
4. Donna Leinwand, States Enter Debate on Sharia Law, USA TODAY, Dec. 9, 2010, at 3A
5. James C. McKinley, Jr., Oklahoma Surprise: Islam as an Election Issue, N.Y. TIMES, NOV. 15, 2010, at A12
6. Darla Slipke, English-Only, Health Care, Sharia Law Measures Pass, OKLAHOMAN, NOV. 3, 2010, at 5A.
7. Bill Raftery, An Examination of 2011 Sharia Law & International Law Bans Before State Legislatures, GAVEL TO GAVEL (Nat'l Ctr. for State Courts, Williamsburg, Va.),Jan. 27, 2011, http://gaveltogavel.us/site/2011/01/27/an- examination-of-2011-sharia-law-international-law-bans-before-state-legislatures
8. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW §111(1) & cmt. d (1987).
9. Curtis A. Bradley & Jack L. Goldsmith, Customary International Law as Federal Common Law: A Critique of the Modem Position, 110 HARV. L. REV. 815 (1997)
10. Curtis A. Bradley & Jack L. Goldsmith, III, The Current Illegitimacy of International Human Rights Litigation, 66 FORDHAM L. REV. 319 (1997)
11. Curtis A. Bradley & Jack L. Goldsmith, Commentary, Federal Courts and the Incorporation of International Law, 111 HARV. L. REV. 2260 (1998)
12. Ryan Goodman & Derek P. Jinks, Filartiga's Firm Footing: International Human Rights and Federal Common Law, 66 FORDHAM L. REV. 463 (1997)
13. Harold Hongju Koh, Commentary, Is International Law Really State Law?, ILL HARV. L. REV. 1824 (1998)
14. Gerald L. Neuman, Sense and Nonsense About Customary International Law: A Response to Professors Bradley and Goldsmith, 66 FORDHAM L. REV. 371 (1997)
15. Beth Stephens, The Law of Our Land: Customary International Law as Federal Law After Erie, 66 FORDHAM L. REV. 393 (1997).
16. Julian G. Ku, Customary International Law in State Courts, 42 VA. J. INT'L L. 265 (2001)
17. Julian G. Ku, The Stale of New York Does Exist: How the States Control Compliance with International Law, 82 N.C. L. REV. 457 (2004)
18. Julian Ku & John Yoo, Beyond Formalism in Foreign Affairs: A Functional Approach to the Alien Tort Statute, 2004 SUP. CT. REV. 153.
19. MICHAEL D. RAMSEY, THE CONSTITUTION'S TEXT IN FOREICN AFFAIRS 348-55 (2007)
20. Michael D. Ramsey, International Law as Non-Preemptive Federal Law, 42 VA. J. INT'L L. 555, 577, 584 (2002).
21. A.M. Weisburd, State Courts, Federal Courts, and International Cases, 20 YALE J. INT'L L. 1, 29-35, 51 (1995).
22. Ernest A. Young, Sorting Out the Debate over Customary International Law, 42 VA. J. INT'L L. 365, 370 (2002).
23. Alexander Aleinikoff, International Law, Sovereignty, and American Constitutionalism: Reflections on the Customary International Law Debate, 98 AM. J. INT'L L. 91, 97-100 (2004).
24. Anthony J. Bellia Jr. & Bradford R. Clark, The Federal Common Law of Nations, 109 COLUM. L. REV. 1, 1 (2009).
25. Bradford R. Clark, Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Federalism, 79 TEX. L. REV. 1321, 1323-24, 1429 (2001)
26. Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith & David H. Moore, Sosa, Customary International Law, and the Continuing Relevance of Erie, 120 HARV. L. REV. 869, 919-24 (2007).
27. Ernest A. Young, Sosa and the Retail Incorporation of International Law, 120 HARV. L. REV. F. 28, 28 (2007), http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/ young.pdf
28. Michael D. Ramsey, Customary International Law in the Supreme Court, 1901-1945, in INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT 225, 253 (David L. Sloss, Michael D. Ramsey & William S. Dodge eds., 2011)
29. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 207 (1987).
30. LORI F. DAMROSCH ET AL., INTERNATIONAL LAW: CASES AND MATERIALS 1037-45 (2009)
31. Anthony J. Bellia Jr., & Bradford R. Clark, The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations, 78 U. CHI. L. REV. 445 (2011)
32. Anthony J. Bellia Jr., The Origins of Article III "Arising Under" furisdiction, 57 DUKE L.J. 263, 334-37 (2007)
33. Ernest A. Young, Stalking the Yeti: Protective Jurisdiction, Foreign Affairs Removal, and Complete Preemption, 95 CALIF. L. REV. 1775, 1820 (2007).
34. Herbert Wechsler, Federal Jurisdiction and the Revision of the Judicial Code, 13 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 216, 224-25 (1948).
35. Carlos M. Vazquez, The Federal "Claim" in the District Courts: Osborn, Verlinden, and Protective Jurisdiction, 95 CALIF. L. REV. 1731 (2007).
36. Paul J. Mishkin, The Federal "Question" in the District Courts, 53 COLUM. L. REV. 157, 192 (1953).
37. Carlos M. Vazquez, Comment, Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria: Federal Jurisdiction over Cases Between Aliens and Foreign States, 82 COLUM. L. REV. 1057, 1081 (1982).
38. RICHARD H. FALLON, JR. ET AL., HART & WECHSLER'S THE FEDERAL COURTS AND THE FEDERAL SYSTEM 765-68 (6th ed. 2009)
39. Michael A. Tunks, Diplomats or Defendants! Defining the Future of Head-ofSlate Immunity, 52 DUKE LJ. 651, 666-73 (2002).
40. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149, 152-54 (1908).
41. David J. Bederman, Law of the Land, Law of the Sea: The Lost Link Between Customary International Law and General Maritime Law, 51 VA. J. INT'L L. 299, 345 (2010).
42. Bradford R. Clark, The Supremacy Clause as a Constraint on Federal Power, 71 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 91, 103-04 (2003)
43. Jonathan F. Mitchell, Reconsidering Murdock: Slate-Law Reversals as Constitutional Avoidance, 77 U. CHI. L. REV. 1335 (2010)
44. COMM. ON FORMATION OF CUSTOMARY (GENERAL) INT'L LAW, INT'L LAW ASS'N, STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE FORMATION OF GENERAL CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW (2000)
45. Jordan J. Paust, International IMU: Before the Supreme Court: A Mixed Record of Recognition, 45 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 829, 832-33 (2005)
46. Christopher P. Banks, The Supreme Court and Precedent: An Analysis of Natural Courts and Reversal Trends, 75 JUDICATURE 262, 263 tbl.l (1992)
47. David S. Cohen, The Precedent-Based Voting Paradox, 90 B.U. L. REV. 183, 220-21 (2010).
48. Henry P. Monaghan, Foreword: Constitutional Common Law, 89 HARV. L. REV. 1, 2-3 (1975)
49. Alfred Hill, The Law-Making Power of the Federal Courts: Constitutional Preemption, 67 COLUM. L. REV. 1024, 1025 (1967).
50. Julian G. Ku, Medellfn's Clear Statement Rule: A Solution for International Delegations, 77 FORDHAM L. REV. 609, 609 (2008).
51. Curtis A. Bradley, Self-Execution and Treaty Duality, 2008 SUP. CT. REV. 131, 178-79
52. David H. Moore, Law(makers) of the Land: The Doctrine of Treaty Non-Self-Execution, 122 HARV. L. REV. F. 32, 46-47 (2009), http://www. harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/moore.pdf
53. Emest A. Young, Treaties as "Part of Our Law, "88 TEX. L. REV. 91,118,123 (2009
54. John T. Parry, Response, Rewriting the Roberts Court's Law of Treaties, 88 TEX. L. REV. ALSO 65 (2010), http://www.texaslrev.com/sites/default/files/ seealso/vol88/pdf/88TexasLRevSeeAlso65.pdf
55. Carlos M. Vazquez, Treaties as Law of the Land: The Supremacy Clause and the Judicial Enforcement of Treaties, 122 HARV. L. REV. 599, 662-63 (2008)
56. Carlos Manuel Vazquez, Less than Zero?, 102 AM. J. INT'L L. 563, 572 (2008)
57. David J. Bederman, Customary International Law in the Supreme Court, 1861-1900, in INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
58. William S. Dodge, Customary International Law in the Supreme Court, 1946-2000, in INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
59. Jonathan I. Charney & W. Michael Reisman, Agora: Breard, 92 AM. J. INT'L L. 666, 666 (1998).
60. Carlos Manuel Vazquez, Night and Day: Coeur d'Alene, Breard, and the Unraveling of the Prospective-Retrospective Distinction in Eleventh Amendment Doctrine, 87 GEO. LJ. 1, 51 (1998).
61. Carlos Manuel Vazquez, The Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Nationalism, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1601 (2008).
62. SELECT CASES OF THE MAYOR'S COURT OF NEW YORK CITY, 1674-1784, at 316 (Richard B. Morris ed., 1935).
63. William A. Fletcher, The General Common Law and Section 34 of the Judiciary Act of 1789: The Example of Marine Insurance, 97 HARV. L. REV. 1513, 1515 n.9 (1984).
64. Caleb Nelson, Sovereign Immunity as a Doctrine of Personal Jurisdiction, 115 HARV. L. REV. 1559 (2002)
65. Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or to Affirm for Want of Substantial Issues at 6-7, Wulfsohn, 266 U.S. 580 (No. 65).
66. Henry Paul Monaghan, Supremacy Clause Textualism, 110 COLUM. L. REV. 731, 741 (2010).
67. MORRIS GREENSPAN, THE MODERN LAW OF LAND WARFARE 376-99 (1959).
68. Carlos Manuel Vazquez, Treaty-Based Rights and Remedies of Individuals, 92 COLUM. L. REV. 1082, 1158 (1992)
69. Philip G. Jessup, The Doctrine o/Erie Railroad v. Tompkins Applied to International Law, 33 AM. J. INT'L L. 740, 743 (1939).
70. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 111 n.3 (1987).
71. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 111 n.1.
72. Louis Henkin, Act of State Today: Recollections in Tranquility, 6 COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 175, 181 (1967)
73. Agora: May the President Violate Customary International Law?, 80 AM. J. INT'L L. 913 (1986)
74. Agora: May the President Violate Customary International Law? (Cont'd), 81 AM. J. INT'L L. 371 (1987).
75. Louis Henkin, The President and International Law, 80 AM. J. INT'L L. 930, 936 (1986).
76. Jonathan I. Charney, The Power of the Executive Branch of the United States Government to Violate Customary International Law, 80 AM. J. INT'L L. 913, 921 (1986)
77. Louis HENKIN, FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 243-44 (2d ed. 1996).
78. Ralph G. Steinhardt, Laying One Bankrupt Critique to Rest: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain and the Future of International Human Rights Litigation in U.S. Courts, 57 VAND. L. REV. 2241, 2254 (2004).
79. William S. Dodge, Customary International Law and the Question of legitimacy, 120 HARV. L. REV. F. 19, 26 (2007), http://www.harvardlawreview.org/ media/pdf/dodge.pdf.
80. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW pt. 1, ch. 2 introductory note (1987)
81. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 111(1) & cmt. d.
82. J. Andrew Kent, Congress's Under-Appreciated Power to Define and Punish Offenses Against the Law of Nations, 85 TEX. L. REV. 843, 861-62 (2007).
83. Carlos Manuel Vazquez, The Four Doctrines of Self-Executing Treaties, 89 AM. J. INT'L L. 695, 718 & n.108 (1995).
84. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 115(1) (1987).
85. Patrick Kelly, The Twilight of Customary International Law, 40 VA. J. INT'L L. 449, 518-23 (2000)
86. John O. McGinnis & Up Somin, Democracy and International Human Rights Law, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1739, 1771-73 (2009).
87. Saikrishna Prakash, The Constitutional Status of Customary International Law, 30 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 65, 70 (2006).
88. Daniel J. Meltzer, Customary International Law, Foreign Affairs, and Federal Common Law, 42 VA. J. INT'L L. 513, 520, 532-36 (2002).
89. William L. Prosser, Interstate Publication, 51 MICH. L. REV. 959, 971 (1953).
90. RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF CONFLICT OF LAWS (1934).
91. BRAINERD CURRIE, Notes on Methods and Objectives in the Conflict of Laws, in SELECTED ESSAYS ON CONFLICTS OF LAWS 177, 183-87 (1963).
92. RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONFLICT OF LAWS § 6(2) (1971)
93. Larry Kramer, Choice of Law in the American Courts in 1990: Trends and Developments, 39 AM. J. COMP. L. 465, 466 (1991)
94. Kermit Roosevelt III, The Myth of Choice of Law: Rethinking Conflicts, 97 MICH. L. REV. 2448, 2466 (1999)
95. See Symeon C. Symeonides, Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2009: Twenty-Third Annual Survey, 58 AM. J. COMP. L. 227, 231 (2010).
96. Michael H. Gottesman, Draining the Dismal Swamp: The Case for Federal Choice of Law Statutes, 80 GEO. LJ. 1, 1-2 (1991)
97. Samuel Issacharoff, Settled Expectations in a World of Unsettled Law: Choice of Law After the Class Action Fairness Act, 106 COLUM. L. REV. 1839, 1839-40 (2006)
98. Jed J. Borghei, Note, Class Action Fairness: A Mature Solution to the 23(b)(3) Choice of Law Problem, 95 GEO. L.J. 1645, 1645-46 (2007)
99. LEA BRILMAYER & JACK GOLDSMITH, CONFLICTS OF LAWS 218-19 (5th ed. 2002)
100. William F. Baxter, Choice of Law and the Federal System, 16 STAN. L. REV. 1, 8 (1963).
101. Lea Brilmayer, Rights, Fairness, and Choice of Law, 98 YALE L.J. 1277, 1300-01 (1989).
102. Brainerd Currie, Comments on Babcock v. Jackson, a Recent Development in Conflict of Laws, 63 COLUM. L. REV. 1212, 1237-38, 1242 (1963).
103. Robert A. Leflar, Choice-Influencing Considerations in Conflicts Law, 41 N.Y.U. L. REV. 267, 295-304 (1966)
104. Robert A. Leflar, Conflicts Law: More on Choice-Influencing Considerations, 54 CALIF. L. REV. 1584, 1588, 1590-93 (1966).
105. RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONFLICT OF LAWS § 145 cmt. d (1971).
106. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 102 cmt. d (1987)
107. Curtis A. Bradley, The Juvenile Death Penalty and International Law, 52 DUKE L.J. 485, 492, 539 (2002)
108. Joan F. Hartman, "Unusual"Punishment: TheDomestic Effects of International Norms Restricting the Application of the Death Penalty, 52 U. CIN. L. REV. 655, 686 (1983)
109. Lynn Loschin, The Persistent Objector and Customary Human Rights Law: A Proposed Analytical Framework, 2 U.C. DAVIS J. INT'L L. & POL'Y 147, 171 (1996)
110. WALTER WHEELER COOK, THE LOGICAL AND LEGAL BASES OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 20-21 (1942).
111. Ernest A. Young, Historical Practice and the Contemporary Debate over Customary International Law, 109 COLUM. L. REV. SIDEBAR 31, 39-40 (2009), www.columbialawreview.org/Sidebar/volume/109/31-Young.pdf.
112. PAUL M. BATOR ET AL., HART AND WECHSLER'S THE FEDERAL COURTS AND THE FEDERAL SYSTEM 1203 (3d ed. 1988)
113. Bradford R. Clark, Federal Common Law: A Structural Reinterpretation, 144 U. PA. L. REV. 1245, 1273-74 (1996)
114. JEAN JACQUES BURLAMAQUI, THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL AND POLITIC LAW 173 (Thomas Nugent trans., Cambridge, Univ. Press 4th ed. 1792)
115. ALBERICO GENTILI, DE IURE BELLI LIBRI TRES 106 (John C. Rolfe trans., Clarendon Press 1933)
116. G.F. DE MARTENS, SUMMARY OF THE LAW OF NATIONS, FOUNDED ON THE TREATIES AND CUSTOMS OF THE MODERN NATIONS OF EUROPE 273 (William Cobbett trans., Phila., Thomas Bradford 1795)
117. SAMUEL PUFENDORF, DE JURE NATURAE ET GENTIUM LIBRI OCTO 127 (C.H. Oldfather & W.A. Oldfather trans., Clarendon Press 1934)
118. EMMERICH DE VATTEL, THE LAW OF NATIONS 145 (Joseph Chitty ed., Philadelphia, T. & J.W. Johnson & Co. 1883)
119. CHRISTIAN WOLFF, JUS GENTIUM METHODO SCIENTIFICA PERTRACTATUM 43-108 (Joseph H. Drake trans., Clarendon Press 1934)
120. H.W. HALLECK, ELEMENTS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND LAWS OF WAR 130, 134 (Philadelphia.J.B. Lippincott & Co. 1866)
121. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 204 cmt. a (1987)
122. Jack L. Goldsmidi, Federal Courts, Foreign Affairs, and Federalism, 83 VA. L. REV. 1617, 1631 (1997)
123. Michael D. Ramsey, The Power of the States in Foreign Affairs: The Original Understanding of Foreign Policy Federalism, 75 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 341, 357-65 (1999).
124. Thomas W. Merrill, The Judicial Prerogative, 12 PACE L. REV. 327 (1992).
125. Bradford R. Clark, Domesticating Sole Executive Agreements, 93 VA. L. REV. 1573, 1597-1607 (2007).
126. Justice Douglas used the "errand boy" language in his concurrence in First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba, 406 U.S. 759, 773 (1972) (Douglas, J., concurring in the result).
127. RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW § 102 n.2 (1987)
128. Bin Cheng, Custom: The Future of General State Practice in a Divided World, in THE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 513, 532 (R. St J. Macdonald & Douglas M. Johnston eds., 1986).
129. Prosper Weil, Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?, 77 AM. J. INT'L L. 413, 435 (1983).
130. MARTTI KOSKENNIEMI, FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA (1989)
131. JACK L. GOLDSMITH & ERIC A. POSNER, THE LIMITS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 42-43 (2005).
132. F.A. Mann, Reflections on the Prosecution of Persons Abducted in Breach of International Law, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AT A TIME OF PERPLEXITY 407, 407 & n.2 (Yoram Dinstein & Mala Tabory eds., 1989)).
133. Kenneth C. Randall & Chimene I. Keitner, Sabbatino, Sosa, and "Supernorms," in LOOKING TO THE FUTURE 559 (Mahnoush H. Arsanjani et al. eds., 2011).
134. RENE PROVOST, INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND HUMANITARIAN LAW 222 (2002)
135. Carlos M. Vazquez, Withdrawing from International Custom: Terrible Food, Small Portions, 120 YALE LJ. ONUNE 269, 279-80 (2011), http://www. yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/955.pdf.