Stress-induced loss of heterozygosity in candida: A possible missing link in the ability to evolve

mBio

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Rosenberg, Susan M ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; ERGOSTEROL; FLUCONAZOLE;

CANDIDA ALBICANS; CHROMOSOME LOSS; DNA SEQUENCE; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; FUNGAL GENE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; NOTE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URA3 GENE;

CANDIDA; CANDIDA ALBICANS;

EID: 80455127325     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00200-11     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Mayr E. 1982. The growth of biological thought, diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Belknap, Cambridge, MA.
2. Galhardo RS, Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM. 2007. Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42:399-435.
3. Forche A, et al. 2011. Stress alters rates and types of loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. mBio 2(4):e00129-11.
4. Knudson AG. 1971. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblas-toma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 68:820-823.
5. Cavenee WK, et al. 1983. Expression of recessive alleles by chromosomal mechanisms in retinoblastoma. Nature 305:779-784.
6. Llorente B, Smith CE, Symington LS. 2008. Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7:859-864.
7. Pavelka N, Rancati G, Li R. 2010. Dr Jeckyll and Mr Hyde: role of aneuploidy in cellular adaptation and cancer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22: 809-815.
8. Radman M. 1975. SOS repair hypothesis: phenomenology of an inducible DNA repair which is accompanied by mutagenesis. Basic Life Sci. 5A: 355-367.
9. McClintock B. 1978. Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Symp. 10:25-47.
10. McPartland A, Green L, Echols H. 1980. Control of recA gene RNA in E. coli: regulatory and signal genes. Cell 20:731-737.
11. Shee C, Gibson JL, Darrow MC, Gonzalez C, Rosenberg SM. 2011. Impact of a stress-inducible switch to mutagenic repair of DNA breaks on mutation in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108: 13659-13664. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1104681108.
12. Harris RS, Longerich S, Rosenberg SM. 1994. Recombination in adaptive mutation. Science 264:258-260.
13. Rosenberg SM, Longerich S, Gee P, Harris RS. 1994. Adaptive mutation by deletions in small mononucleotide repeats. Science 265:405-407.
14. Strathern JN, Shafer BK, McGill CB. 1995. DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair. Genetics 140:965-972.
15. Holbeck SL, Strathern JN. 1997. A role for REV3 in mutagenesis during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147: 1017-1024.
16. Yang Y, Sterling J, Storici F, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA. 2008. Hyper-mutability of damaged single-strand DNA formed at double-strand breaks and uncapped telomeres in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000264.
17. Hicks WM, Kim MP, Haber JE. 2010. Increased mutagenesis and unique mutation signature associated with mitotic gene conversion. Science 329: 82-85.
18. Deem A, et al. 2010. Break-induced replication is highly inaccurate. PLoS Biol. 9:e1000594.
19. Petrosino JF, Galhardo RS, Morales LD, Rosenberg SM. 2009. Stress-induced beta-lactam antibiotic resistance mutation and sequences of stationary-phase mutations in the Escherichia coli chromosome. J. Bacte-riol. 191:5881-5889.
20. Frisch RL, et al. 2010. Separate DNA Pol II- and Pol IV-dependent pathways of stress-induced mutation during double-strand-break repair in Escherichia coli are controlled by RpoS. J. Bacteriol. 192: 4694-4700.
21. Ponder RG, Fonville NC, Rosenberg SM. 2005. A switch from high-fidelity to error-prone DNA double-strand break repair underlies stress-induced mutation. Mol. Cell 19:791-804.
22. Burch LH, et al. 2011. Damage-induced localized hypermutability. Cell Cycle 10:1073-1085.
23. Jarosz DF, Taipale M, Lindquist S. 2010. Protein homeostasis and the phenotypic manifestation of genetic diversity: principles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 44:189-216.
24. McMurray MA, Gottschling DE. 2003. An age-induced switch to a hyper-recombinational state. Science 301:1908-1911.