Relation priming in established compounds: Facilitation?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1472-1486

  Spalding, Thomas L ^a   Gagné, Christina L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complex words; Compounds; Conceptual combination; Noun noun phrases

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80155197383     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0112-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baayen, R. H. (2004). Statistics in psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards. In G. Libben & K. Nault (Eds.), Mental lexical working papers I (pp. 1-45). Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta, Department of Linguistics.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2007). LanguageR: Data sets and functions with "Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics" (R Package Version 0. 1). Edmonton, AB: Author.
3. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
5. Bates, D. M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5, 27-30.
6. Devereux, B., Maguire, P., Costello, F., & Cater, A. (2006). An analysis of the CARIN model of conceptual combination. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1222-1227). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810-842.
8. Estes, Z. (2003). Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 304-319.
9. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. (2006). Priming via relational similarity: A COPPER HORSE is faster when seen through a GLASS EYE. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 89-101.
10. Gagné, C. L. (2001). Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 236-254.
11. Gagné, C. L. (2002). Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds. Brain and Language, 81, 723-735.
12. Gagné, C. L. (2009). Psycholinguistic perspectives. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 255-271). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1997). The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71-87.
14. Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (2002). Priming relations in ambiguous noun-noun combinations. Memory & Cognition, 30, 637-646.
15. Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2004). Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds. Brain and Language, 90, 478-486.
16. Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2006). Conceptual combination: Implications for the mental lexicon. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 145-168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 20-35.
18. Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., & Gorrie, M. (2005a). Sentential context and the interpretation of familiar open-compounds and novel modifier-noun phrases. Language and Speech, 48, 203-221.
19. Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., & Ji, H. (2005b). Re-examining evidence for the use of independent relational representations during conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 445-455.
20. Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L., Figueredo, L., & Mullaly, A. (2009). Does snowman prime plastic snow? The effect of constituent position in using relational information during the interpretation of modifier-noun phrases. Mental Lexicon, 4, 41-76.
21. Gerrig, R. J. (1989). The time-course of sense creation. Memory & Cognition, 17, 194-207.
22. Jones, L. L., Estes, Z., & Marsh, R. L. (2008). An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1169-1176.
23. Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 291-316.
24. Landauer, T. K. (2002). On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 43-84). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
26. Levi, J. N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.
27. Libben, G. (1998). Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language, 61, 30-44.
28. Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50-64. doi: 10. 1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5.
29. Maguire, P., & Cater, A. (2004, July). Is conceptual combination influenced by word order? Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain.
30. Maguire, P., Devereux, B., Costello, F., & Cater, A. (2007). A reanalysis of the CARIN theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 811-821.
31. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
32. Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562.
33. Murphy, G. L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 259-288.
34. Myers, J. (2007). Generative morphology as psycholinguistics. In G. Jarema & G. Libben (Eds.), The mental lexicon: Core perspectives (pp. 105-128). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science.
35. Pelletier, F. J. (2003). Context dependence and compositionality. Mind and Language, 18, 148-161.
36. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer.
37. Ramey, C. H. (2005). Thematic typicality in modifier-noun conceptual combinations: Controlling for presentation-order effects. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 66(5b).
38. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. E. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simple words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
40. Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L. (2007). Semantic property activation during the interpretation of combined concepts. Mental Lexicon, 2, 25-47.
41. Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L. (2008). CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: A comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1573-1578.
42. Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A. C., & Ji, H. (2010). Relation-based interpretations of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft, 17, 283-315.
43. Storms, G., & Wisniewski, E. J. (2005). Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination? Memory & Cognition, 33, 852-861.
44. Warren, B. (1978). Semantic patterns of noun-noun compounds (Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis). Goteborg, Sweden: University of Goteborg.
45. Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 167-183.
46. Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341-368.