When concepts combine

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 167-183

  Wisniewski, Edward J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000005878     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03209392     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93.
2. BARSALOU, L. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27, pp. 1-64). New York: Academic Press.
3. BARSALOU, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. M. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. BARSALOU, L. W., & HALE, C. R. (1992). Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 97-144). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. BRACHMAN, R. J. (1978). A structural paradigm for representing knowledge (BBN Report No. 3605). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranck, & Newman.
6. COHEN, B., & MURPHY, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts. Cognitive Science, 8, 27-58.
7. COOLEN, R., VAN JAARSVELD, H. J., & SCHREUDER, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition, 19, 341-352.
8. DOWNING, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810-842.
9. ELLIOT, R. (1988). The complete vegetarian cuisine. New York: Pantheon.
10. FALKENHAINER, B., FORBUS, K. D., & GENTNER, D. (1989). The structure mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.
11. FILLMORE, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Unconstraineds in linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
12. GAGNE, C., & SHOBEN, E. (1993, April). The influence of relational information on interpreting nonpredicaling combinations. Paper presented at the 65th annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
13. GARROD, S. C., & SANFORD, A. J. (1994). Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 675-698). New York: Academic Press.
14. GENTNER, D. (1981). Verb semantic structures in memory for sentences: Evidence for componential representation. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 56-83.
15. GENTNER, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
16. GENTNER, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity, analogy, and thought (pp. 199-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. GENTNER, D., & MARKMAN, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152-158.
18. GERRIG, R. J., & MURPHY, G. L. (1992). Contextual influences on the comprehension of complex concepts. Language & Cognitive Processes, 7, 205-230.
19. GLUCKSBERG, S., GILDEA, P., & BOOKIN, M. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 85-98.
20. GLUCKSBERG, S., & KEYSAR, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18.
21. GLUCKSBERG, S., MANFREDI, D., & MCGLONE, M. S. (1947). How metaphors create new categories. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 327-350). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. GLUCKSBERG, S., MCGLONE, M. S., & MANFREDI, D. (in press). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language.
23. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1994). Similarity, interactive-activation and mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 3-28.
24. GRICE, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
25. HAMPTON, J. A. (1987). Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory & Cognition, 15, 55-71.
26. HEIT, E., & BARSALOU, L. W. (1996). The instantiation principle in natural categories. Memory, 4, 413-451.
27. HOLYOAK, K. J., & THAGARD, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
28. HUMMEL, J. E., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1996). LISA: A computational model of analogical inference and schema induction. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. HUMMEL, J. E., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (in press). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review.
30. LAKOFF, G., & JOHNSON, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. LEVI, J. N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.
32. LEVIN, B. (1993). English verb classes and alterations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. MARKMAN, A. B., & GENTNER, D. (1993a). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 517-535.
34. MARKMAN, A. B., & GENTNER, D. (1993b). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 431-467.
35. MARKMAN, A. B., & WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1997). Similar and different: The differentiation of basic level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 54-70.
36. MARKS, L. E., & BORNSTEIN, M. H. (1987). Sensory similarities: Classes, characteristics, and cognitive consequences. In R. E. Haskel (Ed.), Cognition and symbolic structures: The psychology of metaphoric transformation (pp. 49-65). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. MARR, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
38. MARTIN, J. D., & BILLMAN, D. O. (1994). Acquiring and combining overlapping concepts. Machine Learning, 16, 121-155.
39. MCGLONE, M. S. (1996). Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought? Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 544-565.
40. MEDIN, D. L., & SHOBEN, E. J. (1988). Context and structure in conceptual combination. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 158-190.
41. MINSKY, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. MURPHY, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562.
43. MURPHY, G. L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 259-288.
44. NISBETT, R. E., & ROSS, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45. NUNBERG, G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics & Philosophy, 3, 143-184.
46. PALMER, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. PINKER, S., & PRINCE, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193.
48. RUMELHART, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. RUMELHART D. E., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1986). On learning past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstucture of cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
50. SCHANK, R. (1972). Conceptual information processing. New York: Elsevier.
51. SCHYNS, P. G., & OLIVA, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for a time- and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Sciences, 5, 195-200.
52. SHOBEN, E. J. (1993). Comprehending nonpredicating conceptual combinations. In G. Nakamura, R. Taraban, & D. Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 20, pp. 391-401). San Diego: Academic Press.
53. SHOBEN, E. J., & GAGNE, C. L. (1997). Thematic relations and the creation of combined concepts. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 31-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54. SMITH, E. E., OSHERSON, D. N., RIPS, L. J., & KEANE, M. (1988). Combining prototypes: A modification model. Cognitive Science, 12, 485-527.
55. THAGARD, P. (1984). Conceptual combination and scientific discovery. In P. Asquith & P. Kitcher (Eds.), PSA: Proceedings (Vol. 1). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
56. TVERSKY, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
57. URDANG, L., & ABATE, F. R. (1983). Idioms and phrases index. Detroit, MI: Book Tower.
58. WILSON, D., & SPERBER, D. (1981). On Grice's theory of conversation. In P. Werth (Ed.), Conversation and discourse. London: Croom Helm.
59. WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1994). Interpretations of novel noun-noun combinations (Technical Report). Northwestern University, Department of Psychology.
60. WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1996a). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 434-453.
61. WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1996b). Property instantiation in conceptual combination. Manuscript submitted for publication.
62. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & GENTNER, D. (1991). On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: Minor and major adjustments to meaning. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 241-284). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
63. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & LOVE, B. (1996). Properties versus relations in conceptual combination. Manuscript in preparation.
64. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & MARKMAN, A. B. (1993). The role of structural alignment in conceptual combination. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1083-1086). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & MEDIN, D. L. (1994). On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science, 18, 221-282.