An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1169-1176

  Jones, Lara L ^a   Estes, Zachary ^b   Marsh, Richard L ^c  

^a FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative recognition; Conceptual combination; Conceptual relations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; MEMORY; RECOGNITION;

ASSOCIATION; HUMANS; MEMORY; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 69649107641     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210801994997     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163-191.
2. Estes, Z. (2003). Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 304-319.
3. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2006). Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 89-101.
4. Gagné, C. L. (2001). Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 236-254.
5. Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1997). Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71-87.
6. Glucksberg, S., & Estes, Z. (2000). Feature accessibility in conceptual combination: Effects of context-induced relevance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 510-515.
7. Hockley, W. E., & Consoli, A. (1999). Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 657-664.
8. Hockley, W. E., & Cristi, C. (1996). Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information. Memory & Cognition, 24, 202-216.
9. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review, 110, 220-263.
10. Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 221-232.
11. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
12. Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 259-282.
13. Murphy, G. L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 259-288.
14. Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Raffray, C. N., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2007). Priming the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 380-395.
16. Springer, K., & Murphy, G. L. (1992). Feature availability in conceptual combination. Psychological Science, 3, 111-117.
17. Storms, G., & Wisniewski, E. J. (2005). Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination? Memory & Cognition, 33, 852-861.
18. Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 167-183.