Industry Funding of University Research and Scientific Productivity

Kyklos

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 534-555

  Hottenrott, Hanna ^a,b   Thorwarth, Susanne ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; OECD; PRIVATE SECTOR; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH WORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

GERMANY;

EID: 80155184049     PISSN: 00235962     EISSN: 14676435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2011.00519.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Amin, M. and M. Mabe (2000). Impact Factors: Use and Abuse, Perspectives in Publishing. 1: 1-6.
2. Auranen, O. and M. Nieminen (2010). University Research Funding and Publication Performance - An International Comparison, Research Policy. 39: 822-834.
3. Azoulay, P., W. Ding and T. Stuart (2009). The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research, The Journal of Industrial Economics. 57: 637-676.
4. Baird, L.M. and C. Oppenheim (1994). Do Citations Matter? Journal of Information Science. 20: 2-15.
5. Banal-Estanol, A., M. Jofre-Bonet and C. Meissner (2010). The Impact of Industry Collaboration on Research: Evidence from Engineering Academics in the UK, UPF Working Paper No. 1190, Barcelona.
6. Benner, M. and U. Sandström (2000). Institutionalizing the Triple Helix: Research Funding and Norms in the Academic System, Research Policy. 29: 291-301.
7. Behrens, T.R. and D. Gray, (2001). Unintended Consequences of Cooperative Research: Impact of Industry Sponsorship on Climate for Academic Freedom and other Graduate Student Outcome, Research Policy. 30: 179-199.
8. Blumenthal, D., E. Campbell, M. Anderson, N. Causino and K. Louis (1996a). Withholding Research Results in Academic Lifescience: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty, Journal of The American Medical Association. 277: 1224-1228.
9. Blumenthal, D., N. Causino, E. Campbell and K. Seashore (1996b). Relationships Between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences - an Industry Survey, The New England Journal of Medicine. 334: 368-373.
10. Blumenthal, D., N. Causino and E. Campbell (1997). Academic-Industry Research Relationships in Genetics: a Field Apart, Nature Genetics. 16: 104-108.
11. Blundell, R., R. Griffith and J. van Reenen (1995). Dynamic Count Data Models of Innovation, Economic Journal. 105: 333-345.
12. Blundell, R., R. Griffith and J. van Reenen (2002). Individual Effects and Dynamics in Count Data Models, Journal of Econometrics. 108: 113-131.
13. Boardman, P.C. and B.L. Ponomariov (2009). University Researchers Working with Private Companies, Technovation. 29: 142-153
14. Bozeman, B. and M. Gaughan (2007). Impacts of Grants and Contracts on Academic Researchers' Interactions with Industry, Research Policy. 36: 694-707.
15. Campbell, E.G., B.R. Clarridge and M. Gokhale etal. (2002). Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: Evidence from a National Survey, JAMA. 287: 473-580.
16. Carayol, N. (2007). Academic incentives and research organization for patenting at a large French university, Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 16: 119-138.
17. Cohen, W., R. Florida and W. Goe (1994). University-Industry Research Centers in the United States, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University.
18. Cohen, W., R. Nelson and J. Walsh (2002). Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D, Management Science. 48: 1-23.
19. Czarnitzki, D., W. Glänzel and K. Hussinger (2009a). Heterogeneity of Patenting Activity and its Implications for Scientific Research, Research Policy. 38: 26-34.
20. Czarnitzki, D., K. Hussinger and C. Schneider (2009b). Why Challenge the Ivory Tower? New Evidence on the Basicness of Academic Patents, Kyklos. 62: 488-499.
21. Dasgupta, P. and P. David (1994). Towards a New Economics of Science, Research Policy. 3: 487-521.
22. David, P.A., D. Mowery and W.E. Steinmueller (1992). Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2: 73 - 90.
23. Ding, W. and T. Stuart (2006). When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences, American Journal of Sociology. 112: 97-144.
24. Dosi, G., P. Llerena and M. Sylos Labini (2006). The Relationships Between Science, Technologies and their Industrial Exploitation: An Illustration Through the Myths and Realities of the so-called 'European Paradox', Research Policy. 35: 1450-1464.
25. European Commission (2003a). The Role of Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, Communication from the Commission, COM(2003) 58 final: 23.
26. European Commission (2003b). Investing in Research: an Action Plan for Europe, Communication from the Commission, COM(2003) 226 final/2: 26.
27. Garfield, E. and A. Welljams-Dorof (1992). Citation Data: Their Use as Quantitative Indicators for Science and Technology Evaluation and Policy-Making, Science & Public Policy. 19: 321-327.
28. Geuna, A. (1997). Allocation of Funds and Research Output: the Case of UK Universities, Revue d'Economie Industrielle. 79: 143-162.
29. Godin, B. and Y. Gingras (2000). The Impact Collaborative Research on Academic Science, Science and Public Policy. 27: 65-73.
30. Gulbrandsen, M. and J.C. Smeby (2005). Industry Funding and University Professors' Research Performance, Research Policy. 34: 932 - 950.
31. Hall, B.H., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (2001). The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools, NBER Working Paper No. 8498.
32. Hellman, T. (2007). The Role of Patents for Bridging the Science to Market Gap, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations. 63: 624-647.
33. Haeussler, C., L. Jiang, J. Thursby and M. Thursby (2009). Specific and General Information Sharing Among Academic Scientists, NBER Working Paper No. 15315.
34. Henderson, R., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998). Universities as a Source of Commercial technology: a Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988, Review of Economics and Statistics. 80: 119-127.
35. Jensen, R. and M. Thursby (2001). Proofs and Propotypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions, American Economic Review. 19: 240-259.
36. Lach, S. and M. Schankerman (2004). Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing at Universtities, Journal of the European Economic Association. 2: 252-264.
37. Lee, Y. (1996). Technology Transfer and the Research University: a Search for the Boundaries of University-Industry Collaboration, Research Policy. 25: 843-863.
38. Louis, K., L. Jones, M. Anderson, D. Blumenthal and E. Campbell, (2001). Entrepreneurship, Secrecy, and Productivity: a Comparison of Clinical and Non-Clinical Faculty, Journal of Technology Transfer. 26: 233-245.
39. Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and Financing, Review of Economics and Statistics. 77: 55-65.
40. Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic Research and Industrial Innovation: an Update of Empirical Findings, Research Policy. 26: 773-776.
41. Mansfield, E. and J-Y. Lee (1996). The modem university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support, Research Policy. 25: 1047-1058.
42. Meissner, C. (2011). Academic Patenting: Opportunity, Support or Attitude, LEI & BRICK Working Paper 07/2011, Turin.
43. Mowery, D.C. (1998). The Changing Structure of the US National Innovation System: Implications for International Conflict and Cooperation in R&D Policy, Research Policy. 27: 639-654.
44. Nelson, R.R. (2001). Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities, Journal of Technology Transfer. 26: 13-19.
45. OECD (2007). Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World Responding to Policy Needs. Paris: OECD Publishing.
46. OECD (2009). Business-funded R&D in the higher education and government sectors, in: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2009. Paris: OECD Publishing.
47. Rosenberg, N. and R. Nelson (1994). American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry, Research Policy. 23: 323-348.
48. Rosenberg, N. (1998). Chemical Engineering as a General Purpose Technology, in: Helpman, E. (Ed.), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press: 167-192.
49. Salter, A.J. and B.R. Martin (2001). The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: a Critical Review, Research Policy. 30: 509-532.
50. Siegel, D.S., D. Waldman and A. Link (1999). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: an Exploratory Study, Research Policy. 32: 27-48.
51. Slaughter, S. and L.L. Leslie (1997). Academic Capitalism, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52. Stern, D.N. and W. Jensen (1983). An Analysis of Publication Productivity of Members of the American Business Law Association, Kyklos. 36: 271-280.
53. Thursby, J. and M. Thursby (2002). Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? The Sources of Growthin University Licensing, Management Science. 48: 90-104.
54. Thursby, J. M. Thursby and S. Gupta-Mukherjee (2007). Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 63: 577-598.
55. Toole, A. and D. Czarnitzki (2010). Commercializing Science: Is there a University "Brain Drain" from Academic Entrepreneurship? Management Science. 56: 1599-1614.
56. Van Dalen, H.P. (1998). Accumulating Knowledge over the Economist's Lifetime, Kyklos. 51: 359-378.
57. Van Dalen, H.P. and A. Klamer (2005). Is Science A Case of Wasteful Competition? Kyklos. 58: 395-414.
58. Van Looy, B., L.M. Ranga, J. Callaert, K. Debackere and E. Zimmermann (2004). Combining Entrepreneurial and Scientific Performance in Academia: Towards a Compounded and Reciprocal Matthew Effect?, Research Policy. 33: 425 - 441.
59. Von Ledebur, S., G. Buenstorf and M. Hummel (2009). University Patenting in Germany Before and After 2002: What Role did the Professors' Privilege Play? Jena Economic Research Papers: 2009-068.
60. Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge: MIT Press.
61. Zucker, L.G. and M.R. Darby (1996). Star Scientists and Institutional Transformation: Patterns of Invention and Innovation in the Formation of the Biotechnology Industry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA). 93: 12709-12716.
62. Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby and J.S. Armstrong (2002). Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology, Management Science. 48: 149-170.