Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Comparisons with the conventional technique

Kurume Medical Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-26

  Shinozaki, Toshiro ^a   Gotoh, Masafumi ^b   Mitsui, Yasuhiro ^a   Hirai, Yoshimasa ^a   Okawa, Takahiro ^b   Higuchi, Fujio ^b   Nagata, Kensei ^a  

^a KURUME UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KURUME UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alignment of the component; Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty; Cruciate retaining prosthesis; Mechanical axis; Radiographic evaluation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80055092037     PISSN: 00235679     EISSN: 18812090     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.58.21     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86:682-687.
2. Robertsson O, Dumbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, and Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 3:262-267.
3. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, and Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72:503-513.
4. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, and Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73:709-714.
5. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, and Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 173:178-183.
6. Lotke PA, and Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 591:77-79.
7. Rand JA, and Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 232:168-173.
8. Petersen TL, and Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3:67-72.
9. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, and Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciatesacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16:635-640.
10. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, and Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8:419-426.
11. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, and Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 260:43-51.
12. Dorr LD, and Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198; 205:5-11.
13. Piazza SJ, Delp SL, Stulberg SD, and Stern SH. Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study. J Orthop Res 1998; 162:264-270.
14. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, and Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation - preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001; 139:109-116.
15. Jenny JY, and Boeri C. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses - a comparative study with conventional instrumentation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001; 139(2):117-119.
16. Jung YB, Lee HJ, Jung HJ, Song KS, Lee JS et al. Comparison of the radiological results between fluoroscopy- assisted and navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17:286-292.
17. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, and Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86:372-377.
18. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, Muratsu H, Kuroda R et al. Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer- assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2004; 28:282-285.
19. Inoue R, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, and Tsukada H. Alignment of lower extremity after navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. -A comparison with the conventional technique-: East-Japanese Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2008; 20:528-532.
20. Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W et al. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20:832-839.
21. Taki K, Majima T, Onodera S, Yamazaki S, Oura H et al. Alignment of lower limb after navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty with ligament balancer. Japanese Journal of Replacement Arthroplasty 2005; 35:105-106
22. Takushi N, and Suguro T. Accuracy of computer navigation system for total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint and Ligament 2003; 16:1453-1460.
23. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, and McGraw RW. Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17:698-705.
24. Martin A, and von Strempel A. Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449:275-282.
25. Kumahashi N, Naito K, Tobita M, Kohno M, Inoue T et al. The investigation of clinical efficacy of navigation system in alignment of the leg after total knee arthroplasty. Kyushuseikaishi 2006; 18:289-293.