The role of group decision making processes in the creation of clinical guidelines

International Review of Psychiatry

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 358-364

  Hopthrow, Tim ^a   Feder, Gene ^b   Michie, Susan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GROUP DYNAMICS; GROUP FORMATION; GROUP PROCESS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS LOSS; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING; THINKING;

DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 80054944574     PISSN: 09540261     EISSN: 13691627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606539     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Berg, M., Meulen, R.T. & van den Burg, M. (2001). Guidelines for appropriate care: The importance of empirical normative analysis. Health Care Analysis, 9, 77-99. doi:10.1023/A:1011307112091. (Pubitemid 32397373)
2. Black, N.A., Murphy, M.K., Lamping, D.L., McKee, C.M., Sanderson, C.F.B., Askham, J., ... Marteau, T. (1999). Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4, 236-248. (Pubitemid 29473735)
3. Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal Social Psychology, 32, 35-56. doi:10.1002/ejsp.74. (Pubitemid 37283075)
4. Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2007). Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 459-479.
5. Burgers, J.S., Bailey, J.V., Klazinga, N., van der Bij, A.K., Grol, R. & Feder, G. (2002). Inside guidelines: Comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diabetes Care, 25, 1933-1939. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.11.1933. (Pubitemid 41071047)
6. Camacho, L.M. & Paulus, P.B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071.
7. Darzi, A. (2008). Evidence-based medicine and the NHS: A commentary. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101, 342-344.
8. Davis, D.A. & Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1997). Translating guidelines into practice: A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157, 408-416. (Pubitemid 27384745)
9. Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. & Altman, D.G. (2001). Systematic Reviews in Health Care. London: BMJ Books.
10. Greenhalgh, T., Potts, H.W.W., Wong, G., Bark, P. & Swinglehurst, D. (2009). Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quarterly, 87, 729-788. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x.
11. Grol, R., Dalhuijsen, J., Thomas, S., Veld, C., Rutten, G. & Mokkink, H. (1998). Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. British Medical Journal, 317, 858-861. (Pubitemid 28434555)
12. Grol, R. & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet, 362, 1225-1230. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. (Pubitemid 37255352)
13. Hemingway, H., Chen, R., Junghans, C., Timmis, A., Eldridge, S., Shekelle, P., ... Feder, G. (2008). Appropriateness criteria for coronary angiography in angina: Reliability and validity. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 221-231.
14. Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M. & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250. (Pubitemid 40300795)
15. Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G.H., Dellinger, P., Schünemann, H., Levy, M.M., Kunz, R., ... Bion, J. (2008). Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. British Medical Journal, 339, 327-337. doi:10.1136/bmj.a744.
16. Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282. doi:10.2307/2393638.
17. Kelly, M., Morgan, A., Ellis, S., Younger, T., Huntley, J. & Swann, C. (2010). Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. Social Science & Medicine, 17, 1056-1062.
18. Kerr, N.L. & Tindale, R.S. (2004). Group performance and decision- making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55. 090902.142009.
19. Klocke, U. (2007). How to improve decision making in small groups: Effects of dissent and training interventions. Small Group Research, 38, 437-468. doi:10.1177/1046496407301974.
20. Magjuka, R.J. & Baldwin, T.T. (1991). Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44, 793-812.
21. Michie, S., Berentson-Shaw, J., Pilling, S., Feder, G., Dieppe, P., Raine, R.,Ellis, S. (2007). Turning evidence into recommendations: Protocol for a study of guideline development groups. Implementation Sci, 29(2). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-29.
22. Michie, S. & Lester, K. (2005). Words matter: Increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines. Quality & Safety in Healthcare, 14, 367-370. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014100. (Pubitemid 41495125)
23. Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S., Kerschreiter, R., Brodbeck, F.C. & Frey, D. (2008). Social validation in group decision making: Differential effects on the decisional impact of preferenceconsistent and preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1477-1490. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.012.
24. Moreira, T. (2005). Diversity in clinical guidelines: The role of repertoires of evaluation. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1975-1985.
25. Moreira, T., May, C. & Eccles, M. (2006). A new method of analysis enables a better understanding of clinical practice guideline development processes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 1199-1206. doi:10.1016/j. jclinepi.2005.08.021. (Pubitemid 44485432)
26. Moreland, R.M. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L.L. Thompson, J.M. Levine & D.M. Messick (Eds), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Moreland, R.L., Argote, L. & Krishnan, R. (1998). Training people to work in groups. In R.S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E.J. Posavac, F.B. Bryant, Y. Suarez Balcazar, E. Henderson- King, & J. Myers (Eds), Theory and Research on Small Groups (pp. 37-60). New York: Plenum Press.
28. Nijstad, B.A. (2000). How the group affects the mind: Effects of communication in idea generating groups. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
29. Nijstad, B.A. (2009). Group Performance. New York: Psychology Press.
30. Offner, A.K., Kramer, T.J. & Winter, J.P. (1996). The effects of facilitation, recording, and pauses on group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 283-298. doi:10.1177/1046496496272005. (Pubitemid 126329953)
31. Pagliari, C. & Grimshaw, J. (2002). Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 8, 145-153. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00333.x. (Pubitemid 34685889)
32. Parks, C.D. & Nelson, N.L. (1999). Discussion and decision: The interrelationship between initial preference distribution and group discussion content. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 87-101. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2856.
33. Postmes, T., Spears, R. & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decisionmaking and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918.
34. Raine, R., Sanderson, C., Hutchins, A., Carter, S., Larkin, K. & Black, N. (2004). An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. Lancet, 364, 429-437. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04) 16766-4. (Pubitemid 39036890)
35. Randsley de Moura, G., Leader, T.I., Pelletier, J. & Abrams, D. (2008). Prospects for group processes and intergroup relations research: A review of 70 years' progress. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 575-596. doi:10.1177/1368430208095406.
36. Rulke, D.L. & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure and group performance. Management Science, 46, 612-625. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.5.612.12052.
37. Russell, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E. & McDonnell, J. (2008). Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13, 40-46. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006029. (Pubitemid 351482320)
38. Scholten, L., Van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B.A. & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539-552. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.010.
39. Schünemann, H.J. (2011). Guidelines 2.0: Do no net harm-The future of practice guideline development in asthma and other diseases. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 11, 261-268. doi:10.1007/s1182-011-0185-8.
40. Sheldon, T.A., Cullum, N., Dawson, D., Lankshear, A., Lowson, K., Watt, I., ... Wright, J. (2004). What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes and interviews. British Medical Journal, 329, 999-1004. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7473.999.
41. Shiffman, R.N., Shekelle, P., Overhage, J.M., Slutsky, J., Grimshaw, J. & Deshpande, A.M. (2003). Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: A proposal from the conference on guideline standardization. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 493-498. (Pubitemid 38124575)
42. Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(88)90028-5.
43. Stasser, G. & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426.
44. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
45. Trinder, L. & Reynolds, S. (2000). Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Appraisal. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
46. Wheelan, S. (2005). Group Processes: A Developmental Perspective (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
47. Wheelan, S., Burchill, C. & Tillin, F. (2003). The link between teamwork and patients ' outcomes in intensive care units. American Journal of Critical Care, 12, 527-534. (Pubitemid 39452083)
48. Woolf, S.H. (1998). Do clinical practice guidelines define good medical care? The need for good science and the disclosure of uncertainty when defining 'best practices'. Chest, 113, 166S-171S. doi:10.1378/chest.113.3-Supplement. 166S.
49. Wyatt, J.C., Paterson-Brown, S., Johanson, R., Altman, D.G., Bradburn, M.J. & Fisk, N.M. (1998). Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units. British Medical Journal, 317, 1041-1046. (Pubitemid 28466719)