An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development

Lancet

Volumn 364, Issue 9432, 2004, Pages 429-437

  Raine, Rosalind ^a   Sanderson, Colin ^a   Hutchings, Andrew ^a   Carter, Simon ^a   Larkin, Kirsten ^a   Black, Nick ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITOR; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR; TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

BACKACHE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; EXPERIMENT; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IRRITABLE COLON; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; TAPE RECORDER;

EID: 3843110351     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16766-4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Woolf H, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 318:1999;527-530
2. Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Makela M, Zaat J, for the AGREE Collaboration. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programmes. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15: 31-45.
3. Chassin M. How do we decide whether an investigation or procedure is appropriate? Hopkins A. Appropriate investigation and treatment in clinical practice. 1989;21-29 Royal College of Physicians, London
4. Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, Hawkins C. Innovation in healthcare: how does credible evidence influence professionals? Health Soc Care Community. 11:2003;219-228
5. Mann T. Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines to improve patient care in the NHS. 1996;Department of Health, London
6. Delbecq A, van de Ven A. A group process model for problem identification and programme planning. J Appl Behav Sci. 7:1971;467-492
7. Glasier A, Brechin S, Raine R, Penney G. A consensus process to adapt the World Health Organisation selected practice recommendations for UK use. Contraception. 68:2003;327-333
8. NICE (UK) National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care (UK). Preoperative tests: the use of routine preoperative tests for elective surgery. 2003;National Institute of Clinical Excellence, London
9. Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assessment. 2:1998;1-88
10. Nicollier-Fahrni A, Vader J, Froehlich F, Gonvers J, Burnand B. Development of appropriateness criteria for colonoscopy: comparison between a standardized expert panel and an evidence-based medicine approach. Int J Qual Health Care. 15:2003;15-22
11. Wortman P, Smyth J, Langenbrunner J, Yeaton W. Consensus among experts and research synthesis: a comparison of methods. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 14:1998;109-122
12. Bernstein S, Lazaro P, Fitch K, Aguilar M, Kahan J. Effect of specialty and nationality on panel judgement of the appropriateness of coronary revascularisation: a pilot study. Med Care. 39:2001;513-520
13. Landrum M, McNeil B, Silva L, Normand S-L. Understanding variability in physician ratings of the appropriateness of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol. 52:1999;309-319
14. Fitch K, Lazaro P, Aguilar M, Martin Y, Bernstein S. Physician recommendations for coronary revascularization: variations by clinical specialty. Eur J Public Health. 9:1999;181-187
15. Herrin J, Etchason J, Kahan J, Brook R, Ballard D. Effect of panel composition on physician ratings of appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: elucidating differences between multi-specialty panel results and specialty society recommendations. Health Policy. 42:1997;67-81
16. Raine R, Haines A, Sensky T, Hutchings A, Larkin K, Black N. Systematic review of mental health interventions for patients with common somatic symptoms: can research evidence from secondary care be extrapolated to primary care. BMJ. 325:2002;1082-1086
17. Reid S, Chalder T, Cleare A, Hotopf M, Wessely S. Extracts from clinical evidence: chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 320:2000;292-296
18. Manning A, Thompson W, Heaton K, Morris A. Towards a positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel. BMJ. 2:1978;653-654
19. Vlaeyen J, Haazen I, Schuerman J, Kole-Snijders A, van Eek H. Behavioural rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: comparison of an operant treatment, an operant-cognitive treatment and an operant-respondent treatment. Br J Clin Psychol. 34:1995;95-118
20. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd edn :1995;Oxford University Press, Oxford
21. SPSS. SPSS base 10.0 for windows users guide. Chicago: SPSS, 1999.
22. Green J. Grounded theory and constant comparative method. BMJ. 316:1998;1064-1065
23. Green J. Commentary: generalisability and validity in qualitative research. BMJ. 319:1999;421
24. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M. Getting evidence into clinical practice: an organisational behaviour perspective. J Health Serv Res Policy. 5:2000;96-102
25. Ayanian J, Landrum M, Normand S-L, Guadagnoli E, McNeil B. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography: do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med. 338:1998;1896-1904
26. Campbell S, Hann M, Roland M, Quayle J-A, Shekelle P. The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey. Med Care. 37:1999;964-968
27. Wood J, Freemantle N. Choosing an appropriate unit of analysis in trials of interventions that attempt to influence practice. J Health Serv Res Policy. 4:1999;44-48
28. Sauerland S, Neugebauer E. Consensus conferences must include a systematic search and categorization of the evidence. Surg Endosc. 14:2000;908-910
29. Pagliari C, Grimshaw J. Impact of group structure and process on multi-disciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observed study. J Eval Clin Pract. 8:2002;145-153