Euclidean nature of phylogenetic distance matrices

Systematic Biology

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 826-832

  De Vienne, Damien M ^a,b   Aguileta, Gabriela ^a,b   Ollier, Sébastien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biodiversity estimation; coevolution; cospeciation; functional diversity; multivariate analysis; phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 80054943881     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr066     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ané C. 2008. Analysis of comparative data with hierarchical autocorrelation. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2:1078-1102.
2. Barton D.E., David F.N. 1956. Some notes on ordered random intervals. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 18:79-94.
3. Blomberg S.P., Garland T. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylo-genetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15:899-910. (Pubitemid 35326122)
4. Blomberg S.P., Garland T., Ives A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution. 57:717-745. (Pubitemid 36579712)
5. Botta-Dukát Z. 2005. Rao's quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. J. Veg. Sci. 16:533-540. (Pubitemid 41626164)
6. Cailliez F. 1983. The analytical solution of the additive constant problem. Psychometrika. 48:305-310.
7. Chessel D., Dufour A.B., Thioulouse J. 2004. The ade4 package-I-one-table methods. R News. 4:5-10.
8. Cheverud J.M., Dow M.M., Leutenegger W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution. 39:1335-1351. (Pubitemid 17247923)
9. Desdevises Y., Legendre P., Azouzi L., Morand S. 2003. Quantifying phylogenetically structured environmental variation. Evolution. 57:2647-2652. (Pubitemid 37502567)
10. Desdevises Y., Morand S., Jousson O., Legendre P. 2002. Coevolution between Lamellodiscus (monogena: Diplectanidae) and Sparidae (Teleostei): the study of a complex host-parasite system. Evolution. 56:2459-2471. (Pubitemid 36108561)
11. Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Sant'Ana C.E., De R., Bini L.M. 1998. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution. 52:1247-1262. (Pubitemid 28537236)
12. Dray S., Dufour A.B., Chessel D. 2007. The ade4 package-II: two-table and K-table methods. R. News. 7:47-52.
13. Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative Method. Am. Nat. 125:1.
14. Felsenstein, J. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. Am. Nat. 171:713-725. (Pubitemid 351706501)
15. Frontier S. 1976. Etude de la décroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyse en composantes principales: comparaison avec le modèle du bâton brisé. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 25:67-75.
16. Garland T.J., Ives A.R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: con-fdence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155:346-364.
17. Gower J.C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika. 53:325-338.
18. Gower J.C. 1982. Euclidean distance geometry. Math. Scientist. 7: 1-14.
19. Gower J.C., Legendre P. 1986. Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. J. Classif. 3:5-48.
20. Harvey P.H., Pagel M.D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Lande R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos. 76:5-13.
22. Lau K.-S. 1985. Characterization of Rao's quadratic entropies. Sankhya: Indian J. Stat. 47:295-309.
23. Legendre P., Desdevises Y., Bazin E. 2002. A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution. Syst. Biol. 51:217-234. (Pubitemid 35180705)
24. Lynch M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution. 45:1065-1080.
25. Martins E.P. 1996. Phylogenies, spatial autoregression, and the comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution. 50:1750-1765. (Pubitemid 26393031)
26. Martins E.P., Hansen T.F. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the anlaysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149: 646-667.
27. Martins E.P., Housworth E.A. 2002. Phylogeny shape and the phylo-genetic comparative method. Syst. Biol. 51:873-880. (Pubitemid 36107978)
28. O'Meara B.C., Ané C., Sanderson M.J., Wainwright P.C. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution. 60:922-933.
29. Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 401:877-884.
30. Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenet-ics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 20:289-290. (Pubitemid 38195693)
31. Pavoine S., Ollier S., Dufour A.-B. 2005. Is the originality of a species measurable? Ecol. Lett. 8:579-586. (Pubitemid 40802024)
32. Pavoine S., Ollier S., Pontier D. 2005. Measuring diversity from dissimilarities with Raos quadratic entropy: are any dissimilarities suitable? Theor. Popul. Biol. 67:231-239. (Pubitemid 40678711)
33. Purvis A., Garland T.J. 1993. Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Syst. Biol. 42:569-575.
34. Rao. C.R. 1982. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unifed approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21:24-43.
35. Rohlf F.J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution. 55:2143-2160. (Pubitemid 34049746)
36. Uhlenbeck G.E., Ornstein L.S. 1930. On the theory of the Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 36:823-841.