A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 217-234

  Legendre, Pierre ^a   Desdevises, Yves ^a,b   Bazin, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE PERPIGNAN   (France)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Fourth corner statistic; Host parasite; Permutation test; Phylogenetic analysis; Power analysis; Simulations; Statistical test

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; LOUSE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RODENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; LICE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RODENTIA;

ANIMALIA; GEOMYIDAE; PHTHIRAPTERA; RODENTIA;

EID: 0036554493     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150252899734     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barker, S. C. 1994. Phylogeny and classification, origins, and evolution of host associations of lice. Int. J. Parasitol. 24:1285-1291.
2. Barrett, J. A. 1986. Host-parasite interactions and systematics. Pages 1-17 in Coevolution and systematics (A. R. Stone and D. L. Hawksworth, eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
3. Boeger, W. A., and D. C. Kritsky. 1997. Coevolution of the Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes) based on a revised hypothesis of parasite phylogeny. Int. J. Parasitol. 27:1495-1511.
4. Brooks, D. R. 1977. Evolutionary history of some plagiorchioid trematodes of anurans. Syst. Zool. 26:277-279.
5. Brooks, D. R. 1979. Testing the context and extent of host-parasite coevolution. Syst. Zool. 28:299-307.
6. Brooks, D. R. 1981. Hennig's parasitological method: A proposed solution. Syst. Zool. 30:229-249.
7. Brooks, D. R. 1985. Historical ecology: A new approach to studying the evolution of ecological associations. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:660-680.
8. Brooks, D. R., And D. R. Glen. 1982. Pinworms and primates: A case study in coevolution. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 49:76-85.
9. Brooks, D. R., and D. A. McLennan. 1991. Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior. A research program in comparative biology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Buneman, P. 1974. A note on the metric properties of trees. J. Comb. Theory B 17:48-50.
11. Charleston, M. A. 1998. Jungles: A new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Math. Biosci. 149:191-223.
12. Demastes, J. W., and M. S. Hafner. 1993. Cospeciation of pocket gophers (Geomys) and their chewing lice (Geomydoecus). J. Mammal. 74:521-530.
13. Edgington, E. S. 1995. Randomization tests, 3rd edition. Marcel Dekker, New York.
14. Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H. Raven. 1964. Butterflies and plants: A study in coevolution. Evolution 18:586-608.
15. Farenholz, H. 1913. Ectoparasiten und Abstammungslehre. Zool. Anz. 41:371-374.
16. Futuyma, D. J., and M. Slatkin. 1983. Coevolution. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts.
17. Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338.
18. Hafner, M. S., and S. A. Nadler. 1988. Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts. Nature 332:258-259.
19. Hafner, M. S., and S. A. Nadler. 1990. Cospeciation in host-parasite assemblages: Comparative analysis of rates of evolution and timing of cospeciation events. Syst. Zool. 39:192-204.
20. Hafner, M. S, P. D. Sudman, F. X. Villablanca, T. A. Spradling, J. W. Demastes, and S. A. Nadler. 1994. Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. Science 265:1087-1090.
21. Hope, A. C. A. 1968. A simplified Monte Carlo test procedure. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 50:35-45.
22. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and Z. Yang. 1997. Statistical tests of host-parasite cospeciation. Evolution 51:410-419.
23. Johnson, K. P., D. M. Drown, and D. H. Clayton. 2001. A data based parsimony method of cophylogenetic analysis. Zool. Scr. 30:79-87.
24. Klassen, G. J. 1992. Coevolution: A history of the macroevolutionary approach to studying host-parasite associations. J. Parasitol. 78:573-587.
25. Klassen, G. J., and M. Beverley-Burton. 1988. North American fresh water ancyrocephalids (Monogenea) with articulating haptoral bars: Host-parasite coevolution. Syst. Zool. 37:179-189.
26. Lapointe, F.-J., and P. Legendre. 1991. The generation of random ultrametric matrices representing dendrograms. J. Classif. 8:177-200.
27. Lapointe, F.-J., and P. Legendre. 1992. A statistical framework to test the consensus among additive trees (cladograms). Syst. Biol. 41:158-171.
28. Legendre, P., R. Galzin, and M. L. Harmelin-Vivien. 1997. Relating behavior to habitat: Solutions to the fourth-corner problem. Ecology 78:547-562.
29. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd English edition. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam.
30. Manly, B. J. F. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, London.
31. Page, R. D. M. 1993a. Component 2.0. Tree comparison software for the use with Microsoft Windows. The Natural History Museum, London.
32. Page, R. D. M. 1993b. Parasites, phylogeny and cospeciation. Int. J. Parasitol. 23:499-506.
33. Page, R. D. M. 1994. Parallel phylogenies: Reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics 10:155-173.
34. Page, R. D. M. 1996. Temporal congruence revisited: Comparison of mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in cospeciating pocket gophers and their chewing lice. Syst. Biol. 45:151-167.
35. Page, R. D. M., and M. A. Charleston. 1998. Trees within trees-Phylogeny and historical associations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:356-359.
36. Page, R. D. M., and M. S. Hafner. 1996. Molecular phylogenies and host-parasite cospeciation: Gophers and lice as a model system. Pages 255-270 in New uses for new phylogenies (P. H. Harvey, A. J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith, and S. Nee, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
37. Page, R. D. M., and E. H. Holmes. 1998. Molecular evolution: A phylogenetic approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
38. Paterson, A. M., and J. B. Banks. 2001. Analytical approaches to measuring cospeciation of host and parasites: Through a glass, darkly. Int. J. Parasitol. 31:1012-1022.
39. Paterson, A. M., R. D. Gray, and G. P. Wallis. 1993. Parasites, petrels and penguins: Does louse presence reflect seabird phylogeny? Int. J. Parasitol. 23:515-526.
40. Pruzansky, S., A. Tversky, and J. D. Carroll. 1982. Spatial versus tree representations of proximity data. Psychometrika 47:3-19.
41. Ronquist, F. 1995. Reconstructing the history of host-parasite associations using generalised parsimony. Cladistics 11:73-89.
42. Ronquist, F. 1997. Phylogenetic approaches in coevolution and biogeography. Zool. Scr. 26:313-322.
43. Roy, B. A. 2001. Patterns of association between crucifers and their flower-mimic pathogens: Host jumps are more common than coevolution or cospeciation. Evolution 55:41-53.
44. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
45. Sidall, M. E. 1996. Phylogenetic covariance probability: Confidence and historical associations. Syst. Biol. 45:48-66.
46. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry-The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman, New York.
47. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4b8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
48. Szidat, L. 1940. Beiträge zum Aubfau eines natürlichen Systems der Trematoden. I. Die Entwicklung von Echinocercaria choanophila U. Szidat zu Cathaemasia hians und die Ableitung der Fasciolidae von den Echinostomidae. Z. Parasitenk. 11:239-283.
49. Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.