Micromitriaceae: A new family of highly reduced mosses

Taxon

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1245-1254

  Goffinet, Bernard ^a   Budke, Jessica M ^a   Newman, Leah C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Bryophyte phylogeny; Ephemeraceae; Micromitrium; Morphological reduction; Neoteny

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GAMETOPHYTE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HABITAT TYPE; MOSS; NEW RECORD; NEW SPECIES; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RECONSTRUCTION; SOIL TYPE; TAXONOMY; TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; DICRANALES; DICRANIDAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; EPHEMERACEAE; EPHEMERUM; FUNARIIDAE; LEUCOBRYACEAE; MICROMITRIUM;

EID: 80054929744     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.605002     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Beckert, S., Steinhauser, S., Muhle, H. & Knoop, V. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of bryophytes based on nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial nad5 gene. Pl. Syst. Evol. 218: 179-192.
2. Braithwaite, R. 1887. The British moss flora, vol. 1, Families of acrocarpous mosses. London: Pewtress & Co.
3. Brotherus, F. 1909. Unterklasse Bryales. Pp. 1173-1239 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 1(3). Leipzig: Engelmann.
4. Brown, J.M., Hedke, S.M., Lemmon, A.R. & Lemmon, E.M. 2010. When trees grow too long: Investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch-length estimates. Syst. Biol. 59: 145-161.
5. Bruch, P., Schimper, W.P. & Gümbel, T. 1836. Bryologia europea, vol. 1. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart.
6. Bryan, V.S. 1957. Cytotaxonomic studies in the Ephemeraceae and Funariaceae. Bryologist 60: 103-126.
7. Bryan, V.S. 1999. Synonymy in Micromitrium. Bryologist 102: 409-411.
8. Bryan, V.S. 2007. Ephemeraceae Schimper. Pp. 646-653 in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds.), Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 27, Bryophyta, part 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Bryan, V.S. & Anderson, L.E. 1957. The Ephemeraceae in North America. Bryologist 60: 67-102.
10. Buck, W.R. & Goffinet, B. 2000. Morphology and classification of mosses. Pp. 124-149 in: Shaw, A.J. & Goffinet, B. (eds.), Bryophyte biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Buck, W.R. & Snider, J.A. 1992. Crumuscus vitalis gen. et sp. nov. (Ditrichaceae). Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 18: 39-41.
12. Buck, W.R., Goffinet, B. & Shaw, A.J. 2000. Testing morphological concepts of orders of pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophyta) using phylogenetic reconstructions based on trnL-trnF and rps4 sequences. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 16: 180-198.
13. Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B., Newton, A.E., Shaw, A.J. & Hedderson, T.A.J. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the diplolepideousalternate mosses (Bryidae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Bryologist 103: 224-241.
14. Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B., Shaw, A.J. & Boles, S.B. 2004. Phylogenic relationships among the mosses based on heterogeneous Bayesian analysis of multiple genes from multiple genomic compartments. Syst. Bot. 29: 234-250.
15. Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B., Wickett, N.J., Boles, S.B. & Shaw, A.J. 2010. Moss diversity: A molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa 9: 175-195.
16. Crosby, M.R. 1980. The diversity and relationships of mosses. Pp. 115-129 in: Taylor, R.J. & Leviton, A.E. (eds.), The mosses of North America. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.
17. Crosby, M.R., Magill, R.E., Allen, B. & He, S. 1999. Checklist of mosses. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
18. Culley, T.M., Weller, S.G. & Sakai, A.K. 2002. The evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 361-369.
19. Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. 1984. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
20. Duckett, J.G., Burch, J., Fletcher, P.W., Matcham, H.W., Read, D.J., Russel, A.J. & Pressel, S. 2004. In vitro cultivation of bryophytes: A review of practicalities, problems, progress and promise. J. Bryol. 26: 3-20.
21. Endress, P.K. 2008. The whole and the parts: Relationships between floral architecture and floral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of the fragmentary floral fossils. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 95: 101-120.
22. Fife, A.J. 1985. A generic revision of the Funariaceae (Bryophyta: Musci). J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 58: 149-196.
23. Fritsch, R. 1982. Index to plant chromosome numbers-Bryophyta. Regnum Vegetabile 108. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.
24. Goffinet, B. & Cox, C.J. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among basal-most arthrodontous mosses with special emphasis on the evolutionary significance of the Funariineae. Bryologist 103: 212-223.
25. Goffinet, B. & Shaw, A.J. 2002. Independent origins of cleistocarpy in the Splachnaceae: Analyses of cpDNA sequences and polyphyly of the Voitioideae (Bryophyta). Syst. Bot. 27: 203-208.
26. Goffinet, B., Bayer, R.J. & Vitt, D.H. 1998. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Orthotrichales (Bryopsida) inferred from rbcL sequence analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1324-1337.
27. Goffinet, B., Buck, W.R. & Shaw, A.J. 2009. Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. Pp. 55-138 in: Goffinet, B. & Shaw, A.J. (eds.), Bryophyte biology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Goffinet, B., Shaw, A.J. & Cox, C.J. 2004. Phylogenetic inferences in the dung-moss family Splachnaceae from analyses of cpDNA sequence data and implications for the evolution of entomophily. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 748-759.
29. Gradstein, S.R. & Wilson, R. 2008. Protonemal neoteny in Bryophytes. Pp. 1-11 in: Mohamed, H., Baki, B.B. Nasrulhaq-Boyce, A. & Lee, P.K.Y. (eds.), Bryology in the New Millenium. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.
30. Gradstein, R.R., Wilson, R., Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. & Heinrichs, J. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships and neotenic evolution of Metzgeriopsis (Lejeuneaceae) based on chloroplast DNA sequences and morphology. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 151: 293-308.
31. Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696-704.
32. Hedderson, T.A., Murray, D.J., Cox, C.J. & Nowell, T.L. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of haplolepideous mosses (Dicranidae) inferred from rps4 gene sequences. Syst. Bot. 29: 29-41.
33. Hillis, D.M. & Bull, J.J. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
34. Huttunen, S. & Ignatov, M.S. 2010. Evolution and taxonomy of aquatic species in the genus Rhynchostegium (Brachytheciaceae, Bryophyta). Taxon 59: 791-808.
35. Kiguchi, H., Iwatsuki, Z. & Suzuki, T. 2006. Micromitrium austinii (Sull.) Lindb. newly found in Japan. Bryol. Res. 9: 103-106.
36. LaFarge, C., Mishler, B.D., Wheeler, J.A., Wall, D.P., Johannes, K., Schaffer, S. & Shaw, A.J. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the haplolepideous mosses. Bryologist 103: 257-276.
37. Les, D.H., Landolt, E. & Crawford, D.J. 1997. Systematics of the Lemnaceae (duckweeds): Inferences from micromolecular and morphological data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 204: 161-177.
38. Lewinsky, J. 1993. A synopsis of the genus Orthotrichum Hedw. (Musci, Orthotrichaceae). Bryobrothera 2: 1-59.
39. Lindberg, S.O. 1879. Musci scandinavici in systemate novo naturali dispositi. Upsala: ex officina Jesaiae Edquisi.
40. Lorch, W. 1923. Die Laubmoose. Berlin: Springer.
41. Marino, P., Raguso, R. & Goffinet, B. 2009. The ecology and evolution of fly dispersed dung mosses (Family Splachnaceae): Manipulating insect behaviour through odour and visual cues. Symbiosis 47: 61-76.
42. Marshall, D.C. 2010. Cryptic failure of partitioned Bayesian phylogenetic analyses: Lost in the land of long trees. Syst. Biol. 59: 108-117.
43. Masuzaki, H., Shimamura, M., Furuki, T., Tsubota, H., Yamaguchi, T., Haji Mohamed Abdul Majid & Deguchi, H. 2010. Systematic position of the enigmatic liverwort Mizutania (Mizutaniaceae, Marchantiophyta) inferred from molecular phylogenetic analyses. Taxon 59: 448-458.
44. Mishler, B.D. 1988. Relationships between ontogeny and phylogeny, with reference to bryophytes. Pp. 117-136 in: Humphries, C.J. (ed.), Ontogeny and systematics. New York: Columbia University Press.
45. Müller, K. 1849. Synopsis muscorum frondosorum omnium hucusque cognitorum, vol. 1, Musci vegetationis acrocarpiae. Berlin: Foerstner.
46. Nees von Esenbeck, C.G., Hornschuch, F. & Sturm, J. 1823-31. Bryologia Germanica, oder Beschreibung der in Deutschland und in der Schweiz wachsenden Laubmoose, Theil 1. New York: G.E. Stechert & Co.
47. Olsson, S., Rumsey, F., Grundmann, M., Russell, S., Enroth, J. & Quandt, D. 2009. The origin of the British and Macaronesian endemic Thamnobryum species (Neckeraceae). J. Bryol. 31: 1-10.
48. Posada, D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molec. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253-1256.
49. Pressel, S., Matcham, H. & Duckett, J.G. 2005. Studies of protonemal morphogenesis in mosses. X. Ephemeraceae revisited; New dimensions underground. J. Bryol. 27: 311-318.
50. Rambaut, A. & Drummond, AJ. 2009. Tracer, version 1.5. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.
51. Reeb, V., Lutzoni, F. & Roux, C. 2004. Contribution of RPB2 to multilocus phylogenetic studies of the Pezizomycotina (euascomycetes, Fungi) with special emphasis on the lichen-forming Acarosporaceae and evolution of polyspory. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 32: 1036-1060.
52. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
53. Schimper, W.P. 1856. Corollarium bryologiae europaeae, conspectum diagnosticum familiarum, generum et specierum, adnotationes novas atque emendations complectens. Stuttgart: sumptibus Librariae E. Schweizerbart.
54. Shaw, A.J. 2000. Phylogeny of the Sphagnopsida based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Bryologist 103: 277-306.
55. Shaw, A.J., Anderson, L.E. & Mishler, B.D. 2000. Paedomorphic sporophyte development in Bruchia flexuosa (Bruchiaceae). Bryologist 103: 147-155.
56. Smyth, B.B. 1913. Provisional catalogue of the flora of Kansas. Part II. Gymnosperms and monocotyls. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 25: 63-128.
57. Sotiaux, A., Enroth, J., Olsson, S., Quandt, D. & Vanderpoorten, A. 2009. When morphology and molecules tell us different stories: A case-in point with Leptodon corsicus, a new and unique endemic moss species from Corsica. J. Bryol. 31: 186-196.
58. Stech, M. 1999. A reclassification of Dicranaceae (Bryopsida) based on non-coding cpDNA sequence data. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 86: 137-159.
59. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
60. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification for three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
61. Vitt, D.H. 1981. Adaptive modes of the moss sporophyte. Bryologist 84: 166-186.
62. Vitt, D.H. 1982. Sphagnopsida and Bryopsida, Pp. 305, 307-336 in: Parker, S.P. (ed.), Synopsis and classification of living organisms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
63. Vitt, D.H. 1984. Classification of the Bryopsida. Pp. 696-759 in: Schuster, R.M. (ed.), New manual of bryology, vol. 2. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory.
64. Werner, O., Ros, R.M. & Goffinet, B. 2007. A reconsideration of the systematic position of Goniomitrium (Funariaceae) based on chloroplast sequence markers. Bryologist 110: 108-114.
65. Westwood, J.H., Yoder, J.I., Timko, M.P. & dePamphilis, C.W. 2010. The evolution of parasitism in plants. Trends Pl. Sci. 15: 227-235.
66. Wickett, N.J. & Goffinet, B. 2008. The origin and relationships of the myco-heterotrophic liverwort Cryptothallus mirabilis Malmb. (Metzgeriales, Marchantiophyta). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 156: 1-12.
67. Zander, R.H. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: Mosses of harsh environments. Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 32: i-vi, 1-378.
68. Zander, R.H. 2006. The Pottiaceae s. str. as an evolutionary Lazarus taxon. J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 100: 581-602.
69. Zwickl, D. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.