Paedomorphic sporophyte development in Bruchia flexuosa (Bruchiaceae)

Bryologist

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 147-155

  Shaw, A Jonathan ^a   Anderson, Lewis E ^a   Mishler, Brent D ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRUCHIA FLEXUOSA; BRUCHIACEAE; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; PTERIDOPHYTA; TREMATODON; TREMATODON LONGICOLLIS;

EID: 0034018263     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0147:PSDIBF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ABEDON, B. G. & W. F. TRACY. 1996. Corngrass1 of maize (Zea mays L.) delays development of adult plant resistance to common rust (Piccinia sorghi Schw.) and the european corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hubener). Journal of Heredity 87: 219-223.
2. ALBERCH, P. 1980. Ontogenesis and morphological diversification. American Zoologist 20: 653-667.
3. ALTESOR, A., C. SILVA & E. EZCURRA. 1994. Allometric neoteny and the evolution of succulence in cacti. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 114: 283-292.
4. ANDERSON, L. E. & J. A. SNIDER. 1982. Cytological and genetic barriers in mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 52: 241-254.
5. ANDREWS, A. L. & F. J. HERMANN. 1959. A natural hybrid in the Ditrichaceae. THE BRYOLOGIST 62: 119-122.
6. BLOMQUIST, H. L. & L. L. ROBERTSON. 1941. The development of the peristome in Aulacomnium heterostichum. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 68: 569-584.
7. BRIDEL, S. E. 1826. Bryologia Universa, seu systematica and novum methodum dispositio, historia et descriptio omnium muscorum frondosorum hucusque cognitorum cum synonymia ex auctoribus probatissimis. Vol. 2. Leipzig.
8. CRUNDWELL, A. C. & E. NYHOLM. 1972. A revision of Weissia, subgenus Astomum. I. The European species. Journal of Bryology 7: 7-19.
9. EDWARDS, S. R. 1979. Taxonomic implications of cell patterns in haplolepideous moss peristomes, pp. 317-346. In G. C. S. Clarke & J. G. Duckette (eds.), Bryophyte Systematics. Academic Press, NY.
10. EVANS, M. M. S., H. J. PASSAS & R. S. POETHIG. 1994. Heterochronic effects of glossy 15 mutations on epidermal cell identity in maize. Development (Cambridge) 120: 1971-1981.
11. GOULD, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
12. GUERRANT, E. O. 1982. Neotenic evolution of Delphinium nudicaule (Ranunculaceae): A hummingbird-pollinated larkspur. Evolution 36: 699-712.
13. JOHANNSEN, D. A. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw Hill, NY.
14. JONES, C. S. 1992. Comparative ontogeny of a wild cucurbit and its derived cultivar. Evolution 46: 1827-1847.
15. _. 1993. Heterochrony and heteroblastic leaf development in two subspecies of Cucurbita argyrosperma. American Journal of Botany 80: 778-795.
16. KAPLAN, D. R. 1980. Heteroblastic leaf development in Acacia: morphological and morphogenetic implications. Cellule 73: 135-203.
17. KATO, M. 1991. Further comments on an ophioglossoid archetype for the angiosperm carpel: Ovular pedomorphosis. Taxon 40: 189-194.
18. KELLOGG, E. A. 1990. Ontogenetic studies of florets in Poa (Gramineae: Allometry and heterochrony. Evolution 44: 1978-1989.
19. LORD, E. M. 1982. Floral morphogenesis in Lamium amplexicaule L. (Labiatae) with a model for the evolution of the cleistogamous flower. Botanical Gazette 143: 63-72.
20. _, K. J. ECKARD & W. CRONE. 1989. Development of the dimorphic anthers in Collimia grandiflora; evidence for heterchrony in the evolution of the cleistogamous anther. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2: 81-94.
21. MARSHALL, J. E. A. 1996. Rhabdosporites langii, Geminosporalemurata and Contagisporites optivus: An origin for heterospory with the progymnosperms. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 93: 159-189.
22. MAYERS, A. M. & E. M. LORD. 1983a. Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. I. A growth rate study. American Journal of Botany 70: 1548-1555.
23. _ & _. 1983b. Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. II. An organographic study. American Journal of Botany 70: 1556-1563.
24. MINTER, T. C. & E. M. LORD. 1983. A comparison of cleistogamous and chasmogamcus floral development in Collomia grandiflora Dougl. ex. Lindl. (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 70: 1499-1508.
25. MCNAMARA, K. J. (ED.). 1995. Evolutionary Change and Heterochrony. Wiley, NY.
26. NEWTON, A. E. & B. D. MISHLER. 1994. The evolutionary significance of asexual reproduction in mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 76: 127-145.
27. PETTET, A. 1964. Hybrid sporophytes in the Funariaceae. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 4: 642-648.
28. POETHIG, R. S. 1988. Heterochronic mutations affecting shoot development in maize. Genetics 119: 959-974.
29. REESE, W. D. & B. E. LEMMON. 1965. A natural hybrid between Weissia and Astomum and notes on the nomenclature of the North American species of Astomum. THE BRYOLOGIST 68: 277-283.
30. RUSHING, A. E. 1986. A revision of the genus Bruchia Schwaegr. (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 60: 35-83.
31. _ & J. A. SNIDER. 1980. Observations on sporophyte development in Lorentziella imbricata (Mitt.) Broth. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 47: 35-44.
32. _& _. 1985. A natural hybrid between Bruchia microspora Nog. and Trematodon longicollis Mischx. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 11: 121-132.
33. SHAW, A. J. & L. E. ANDERSON. 1988. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. II. Tetraphis pellucida (Tetraphidaceae). American Journal of Botany 75: 1019-1032.
34. _, _ & B. D. MISHLER. 1987. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. I. Diphyscium foliosum (Buxbaumiaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 45: 55-70.
35. _, _ & _. 1989a. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudotriquetrum, and B. bicolor. Systematic Botany 14: 24-36.
36. _, B. D. MISHLER & L. E. ANDERSON. 1989b. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. IV. Haplolepideae: Ditrichaceae and Dicranaceaé. The Bryologist 92: 314-325.
37. TAKHTAJAN, A. 1972. Patterns of ontogenetic alterations in the evolution of higher plants. Phytomorphology 22: 164-171.
38. TUCKER, S. C. 1988. Heteromorphic flower development in Neptunia pubescens, a mimosoid legume. American Journal of Botany 75: 205-224.
39. VILLANI, P. J. & D. A. DEMASSON. 1997. Roles of the AF and TL genes in pea leaf morphogenesis: characterization of the double mutant (afaftltl). American Journal of Botany 84: 1323-1336.
40. WETTSTEIN, F. 1928. Morphologie und Physiologie des Formwechsels der Moose auf genetischer Grundlage. II. Bibliotheca Genetica 10: 1-216.
41. WILTSHIRE, R. J. E., I. C. MURFET & J. B. REID. 1994. The genetic control of heterochrony: Evidence from development mutants of Pisum sativum L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 7: 447-465.