Loss of sexual recombination and segregation is associated with increased diversification in evening primroses

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3230-3240

  Johnson, Marc T J ^a   Fitzjohn, Richard G ^b   Smith, Stacey D ^c   Rausher, Mark D ^d   Otto, Sarah P ^e  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

Apomixis; BiSSE; Comparative biology; Oenothera; Translocation heterozygote

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; APOMIXIS; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; EXTINCTION; HERB; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVENING PRIMROSE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES EXTINCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; GENETIC SPECIATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; OENOTHERA; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL;

OENOTHERA;

EID: 80054922044     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01378.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alfaro, M. E., F. Santini, C. Brock, H. Alamillo, A. Dornburg, D. L. Rabosky, G. Carnevale, and L. J. Harmon 2009. Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:13410-13414.
2. Barraclough, T. G., C. W. Birky, and A. Burt 2003. Diversification in sexual and asexual organisms. Evolution 57:2166-2172.
3. Barton, N. H. 1995. A general model for the evolution of recombination. Gen. Res. 65:123-144.
4. Becks, L., and A. F. Agrawal 2011. Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments. Nature 468:89-92.
5. Bell, G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature. Univ. of California Press, CA.
6. Birky, C. W., C. Wolf, H. Maughan, L. Herbertson, and E. Henry 2005. Speciation and selection without sex. Hydrobiologia 546:29-45.
7. Bull, J. J., and E. L. Charnov 1985. On irreversible evolution. Evolution 39:1149-1155.
8. Churchill, G. A. 2000. Inferring ancestral characters. Evol. Biol. 32:117-134.
9. Cleland, R. E. 1972. Oenothera: cytogenetics and evolution. Academic Press, New York, NY.
10. Colegrave, N. 2002. Sex releases the speed limit on evolution. Nature 420:664-666.
11. Cooper, T. F. 2007. Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 5:1899-1905.
12. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
13. Dietrich, W. 1977. The South American species of Oenothera Sect. Oenothera (Raimannia, Renneria; Onagraceae). Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 64:425-626.
14. Dietrich, W., and W. L. Wagner 1988. Systematics of Oenothera section Oenothera Subsection Raimannia and Subsection Nutantigemma (Onagraceae). Syst. Bot. Monog. 24:1-91.
15. Dietrich, W., W. L. Wagner, and P. H. Raven 1997. Systematics of Oenothera section Oenothera subsection Oenothera (Onagraceae). Syst. Bot. Monog. 50:1-234.
16. Domes, K., R. A. Norton, M. Maraun, and S. Scheu 2007. Reevolution of sexuality breaks Dollo's law. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:7139-7144.
17. Drummond, A. J., S. Y. W. Ho, M. J. Phillips, and A. Rambaut 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4:e88, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088.
18. Evans, M. E. K., D. J. Hearn, W. J. Hahn, J. M. Spangle, and D. L. Venable 2005. Climate and life-history evolution in evening primroses (Oenothera, Onagraceae): a phylogenetic comparative analysis. Evolution 59:1914-1927.
19. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals. Evolution 35:124-138.
20. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, UK
21. FitzJohn, R. G., W. P. Maddison, and S. P. Otto 2009. Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 58:595-611.
22. Ford, V. S., and L. D. Gottlieb 2003. Reassessment of phylogenetic relationships in Clarkia sect Sympherica. Am. J. Bot. 90:284-292.
23. Ford, V. S., and L. D. Gottlieb 2007. Tribal relationships within Onagraceae inferred from PgiC sequences. Syst. Bot. 32:348-356.
24. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
25. Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin 2004. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
26. Goldberg, E. E., J. R. Kohn, R. Lande, K. A. Robertson, S. A. Smith, and B. Igić 2010. Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science 330:459-460.
27. Harte, C. 1994. Oenothera: contributions of a plant to biology. Springer-Verlag, NY
28. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson 1966. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.
29. Hoggard, G. D., P. J. Kores, M. Molvray, and R. K. Hoggard 2004. The phylogeny of Gaura (Onagraceae) based on ITS, ETS, and trnL-F sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 91:139-148.
30. Holsinger, K. E., and N. C. Ellstrand 1984. The evolution and ecology of permanent translocation heterozygotes. Am. Nat. 124:48-71.
31. Johnson, M. T. J. 2011. The contribution of evening primrose (Oenothera biennis) to a modern synthesis of evolutionary ecology. Pop. Ecol. 53:9-21.
32. Johnson, M. T. J., S. D. Smith, and M. D. Rausher 2009. Plant sex and the evolution of plant defenses against herbivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:18079-18084.
33. Johnson, S. G., and R. S. Howard 2007. Contrasting patterns of synonymous and nonsynonymous sequence evolution in asexual and sexual freshwater snail lineages. Evolution 61:2728-2735.
34. Levin, R. A., W. L. Wagner, P. C. Hoch, W. J. Hahn, A. Rodriguez, D. A. Baum, L. Katinas, E. A. Zimmer, and K. J. Sytsma 2004. Paraphyly in tribe Onagreae: insights into phylogenetic relationships of Onagraceae based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Syst. Bot. 29:147-164.
35. Lewis, H., and J. Szweykowski 1964. The genus Gayophytum (Onagraceae). Brittonia 16:343-391.
36. Lively, C. M. 2010. A review of Red Queen models for the persistence of obligate sexual reproduction. J. Hered. 101:S13-S20.
37. Lynch, M., and W. Gabriel 1990. Mutation load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44:1725-1737.
38. Maddison, W. P., P. E. Midford, and S. P. Otto 2007. Estimating binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 56:701-710.
39. Mark Welch, D. B., and M. S. Meselson 2001. Rates of nucleotide substitution in sexual and anciently asexual rotifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:6720-6724.
40. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The evolution of sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, UK
41. Menken, S. B. J., E. Smit, and H. C. M. Den Nijs 1995. Genetical population structure in plants: gene flow between diploid sexual and triploid asexual dandelions (Taraxacum section Ruderalia). Evolution 49:1108-1118.
42. Muller, H. J. 1932. Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 66:118-138.
43. Muller, H. J. 1964. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mut. Res. 1:2-9.
44. Munz, P. A. 1965. Onagraceae. North American Flora, Series II. 5:1-278.
45. Neiman, M., G. Hehman, J. T. Miller, J. M. Logsdon, and D. R. Taylor 2010. Accelerated mutation accumulation in asexual lineages of a freshwater snail. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:954-963.
46. Nunney, L. 1989. The maintenance of sex by group selection. Evolution 43:245-257.
47. Otto, S. P. 2009. The evolutionary enigma of sex. Am. Nat. 174:S1-S14.
48. Paland, S., and M. Lynch 2006. Transitions to asexuality result in excess amino acid substitutions. Science 311:990-992.
49. Plummer, M., N. Best, K. Cowles, and K. Vines 2006. CODA: Convergence Diagnosis and Output Analysis for MCMC. R News 6:7-11.
50. Rabosky, D. L. 2010. Extinction rates should not be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Evolution 64:1816-1824.
51. Ranganath, R. M. 2008. Meiotic chromosome pairing and recombination take refuge in the telomeres. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9.
52. Rauwolf, U., H. Golczyk, J. Meurer, R. G. Herrmann, and S. Greiner 2008. Molecular marker systems for Oenothera genetics. Genetics 180:1289-1306.
53. Rauwolf, U., S. Greiner, J. Mráček, M. Rauwolf, H. Golczyk, V. Mohler, R. G. Herrmann, and J. Meurer 2011. Uncoupling of sexual reproduction from homologous recombination in homozygous Oenothera species. Heredity 107:87-94.
54. Raven, P. H. 1979. A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae. N. Z. J. Bot. 17:575-593.
55. Raven, P. H., and D. P. Gregory 1972. A revision of the genus Gaura (Onagraceae). Mem. Torr. Bot. Club 23:1-96.
56. Ronquist, F., J. P. Huelsenbeck, and P. van der Mark 2005. MrBayes 3.1 Manual. Available at (accessed January 19, 2009).
57. Sanderson, M. J. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19:301-302.
58. Schwander, T., and B. J. Crespi 2009. Twigs on the tree of life? Neutral and selective models for integrating macroevolutionary patterns with microevolutionary processes in the analysis of asexuality. Mol. Ecol. 18:28-42.
59. Simon, J. C., F. Delmotte, C. Rispe, and T. Crease 2003. Phylogenetic relationships between parthenogens and their sexual relatives: the possible routes to parthenogenesis in animals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79:151-163.
60. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
61. Stanley, S. M. 1975. Clades versus clones in evolution: why we have sex. Science 190:382-383.
62. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, NY
63. Straley, G. B. 1977. Systematics of Oenothera sect. Kneiffia (Onagraceae). Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 74:381-424.
64. Stubbe, W., and P. H. Raven 1979. A genetic contribution to the taxonomy of Oenothera Sect. Oenothera (including subsections Euoenothera, Emersonia, Raimannia, and Munzia). Plant Syst. Evol. 133:39-59.
65. Swanstrom, J., K. Chen, K. Castillo, T. G. Barraclough, and D. Fontaneto 2011. Testing for evidence of inefficient selection in bdelloid rotifers: do sample size and habitat differences matter? Hydrobiologia 662:19-25.
66. Towner, H. F. 1970. The biosystematics of Calylophus (Onagraceae). Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 64:48-120.
67. Wagner, W. L. 2005. Systematics of Oenothera Sections Contortae, Eremia, and Ravenia (Onagraceae). Syst. Bot. 30:332-355.
68. Wagner, W. L., P. C. Hoch, and P. H. Raven 2007. Revised classification of the Onagraceae. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 83:1-222.
69. Weismann, A. 1889. The significance of sexual reproduction in the theory of natural selection. Pp. 251-332 in E. B. Poulton, S. Schonland, and A. E. Shipley, eds. Essay upon heredity and kindred biological problems. Clarendon Press, UK
70. Whitton, J., C. J. Sears, E. J. Baack, and S. P. Otto 2008. The dynamic nature of apomixis in the angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169:169-182.
71. Williams, G. C. 1975. Sex and evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, NJ