Tribal relationships within Onagraceae inferred from PgiC sequences

Systematic Botany

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 348-356

  Ford, V S ^a   Gottlieb, L D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Molecular phylogeny; Onagraceae; PgiC

Indexed keywords

EPILOBIUM; EPILOBIUM BRACHYCARPUM; EPILOBIUM CANUM; ONAGRACEAE;

EID: 34447302579     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364407781179725     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BAUM, D. A., K. J. SYTSMA, and P. C. HOCH. 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 363-388.
2. BULT, C. J. and E. A. ZIMMER. 1993. Nuclear ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring tribal relationships within Onagraceae. Systematic Botany 18: 48-63.
3. CONTI, E., A. FISHBACH, and K. J. SYTSMA. 1993. Tribal relationships in Onagraceae: implications from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 672-685.
4. CRISCI, J. V., E. A. ZIMMER, P. C. HOCH, G. B. JOHNSON, C. MUDD, and N. PAN. 1990. Phylogenetic implications of ribosomal DNA restriction site variation in the plant family Onagraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77: 523-538.
5. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annual Review of Genetics 22: 521-565.
6. FORD, V. S. and L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1999. Molecular characterization of PgiC in a tetraploid plant and its diploid relatives. Evolution 53: 1060-1067.
7. _ and _. 2002. Single mutations silence PgiC2 genes in two very recent allotetraploid species of Clarkia. Evolution 56: 699-707.
8. _ and _. 2003. Reassessment of phylogenetic relationships in Clarkia sect. Sympherica. American Journal of Botany 90: 284-292.
9. _, J. LEE, B. G. BALDWIN, and L. D. GOTTLIEB. 2006. Species divergence and relationships in Stephanomeria (Compositae): PgiC phylogeny compared to prior biosystematic studies. American Journal of Botany 93: 480-490.
10. GONZÁLEZ ELIZONDO, M. S., I. L. LÓPEZ ENRIQUEZ, and W. L. WAGNER. 2002. Megacorax gracielanus (Onagraceae), a new genus and species from Durango, Mexico. Novon 12: 360-365.
11. GOTTLIEB, L. D. and V. S. FORD. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among the sections of Clarkia (Onagraceae) inferred from the nucleotide sequences of PgiC. Systematic Botany 20: 45-62.
12. HOCH, P. C. and W. L. WAGNER. 2006. Toward a new classification for Onagraceae. Abstract 689, Systematics section, Botany 2006, Chico, California. http://www.2006.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php? func=detail&aid=689
13. _, J. V. CRISCI, H. TOBE, and P. E. BERRY. 1993. A cladistic analysis of the plant family Onagraceae. Systematic Botany 18: 31-47.
14. HOGGARD, G. D., P. J. KORES, M. MOLVRAY, and R. K. HOGGARD. 2004. The phylogeny of Gaura (Onagraceae) based on ITS, ETS, and trnL-F sequence data. American Journal of Botany 91: 139-148.
15. LEVIN, R. A., W. L. WAGNER, P. C. HOCH, W. J. HAHN, A. RODRIGUEZ, D. A. BAUM, L. KATINAS, E. A. ZIMMER, and K. J. SYTSMA. 2004. Paraphyly in tribe Onagreae: insights into phylogenetic relationships of Onagraceae based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. Systematic Botany 29: 147-164.
16. _, M. NEPOKROEFF, J. C. PIRES, E. A. ZIMMER, and K. J. SYTSMA. 2003. Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. American Journal of Botany 90: 107-115.
17. LEWIS, H. and M. E. LEWIS. 1955. The genus Clarkia. University of California Publications in Botany 20: 241-392.
18. MARTIN, P. G. and J. M. DOWD. 1986. Phylogenetic studies using protein sequences within the order Myrtales. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 442-448.
19. O'KANE, S. L., JR., and B. A. SCHAAL. 1998. Phylogenetics of Lopezia (Onagraceae): evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction sites. Systematic Botany 23: 5-20.
20. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
21. RAVEN, P. H. 1979. A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 575-593.
22. _. 1988. Onagraceae as a model of plant evolution. Pp. 85-107 in Plant Evolutionary Biology, eds. L. D. Gottlieb and S. K. Jain. London: Chapman and Hall.
23. SANDERSON, M. L. 1998. Estimating rate and time in molecular phylogenies: Beyond the molecular clock? Pp. 242-264 in Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing, eds. D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
25. SYTSMA, K. J. and J. F. SMITH. 1988. DNA and morphology: comparisons in the Onagraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 1217-1237.
26. _ and _. 1992. Molecular systematics of Onagraceae: examples from Clarkia and Fuchsia. Pp. 295-323 in Molecular Systematics of Plants. eds. P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle. New York: Chapman and Hall.
27. THOMAS, B. R., V. S. FORD, E. PICHERSKY, and L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1993. Molecular characterization of duplicate phosphoglucose isomerase genes in Clarkia and comparison to the single gene in Arabidopsis. Genetics 135: 895-905.
28. _, D. LAUDENCIA-CHINGCUANCO, and L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1992. Molecular analysis of the plant gene encoding cytosolic phosphoglucose isomerase. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 745-757.
29. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, and T. J. GIBSON. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.