Validation of two measuring instruments for routine outcome monitoring in psychiatry: The HORVAN study;Validering van twee meetinstrumenten voor routine outcome monitoring in de psychiatrie: De HORVAN-studie

Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 715-726

  Buwalda, Victor J A ^a   Draisma, Stasja ^b   Smit, Jan ^c   Swinkels, Jan ^d   Van Tilburg, Willem ^c  

^a Altrecht   (Netherlands)

^b Afdeling Onderzoek   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinically significant change; Routine outcome monitoring (ROM); Validation study

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH OF THE NATION OUTCOME SCALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME QUESTIONNAIRE; PSYCHOMETRY; SYMPTOM CHECKLIST 90; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80054910895     PISSN: 03037339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aarsse R. Betekenis van cliënttevredenheid als indicator voor kwaliteit van zorg. Amsterdam: Thela; 2003.
2. Aartsen MJ, Spitsbaard AK, van Baarsen C, Dhondt ADF, Mascini M, Nefs A, e.a. Een multicenterstudie naar betrouwbaarheid, validiteit en gevoeligheid voor verandering van de HoNOS65+ binnen de ouderenpsychiatrie. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2010; 52: 543-53.
3. Arrindell W, Boomsma A, Ettema H, Stewart R. Verdere steun voor het multi-dimensionale karakter van de SCL-90-R. De Psycholoog 2004; 39: 194-201.
4. Arrindell WA, Ettema JHM. SCL-90: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1986/2003.
5. Beurs E de, Den Hollander-Gijsman M, Buwalda V, Trijsburg W, Zitman F. De Outcome Questionnaire (OQ45): psychodiagnostisch gereedschap. De Psycholoog 2005; 40: 393-400.
6. Broersma TW, Sytema S. Implementatie van het meetinstrument HoNOS65+. Onderzoek op een afdeling ouderenpsychiatrie. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2008; 50: 77-82. (Pubitemid 351265211)
7. Chapman JE. Reliability and validity of the Progress Questionnaire: an adaptation of the Outcome Questionnaire. Philadelphia: Drexel University; 2003.
8. Derogatis LR. The SCL-90 Manual; Scoring, administration and procedures for the SCL-90. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; 1977.
9. Doerfler LA, Addis, ME, Moran PW. Evaluating mental health outcomes in an inpatient setting: convergent and divergent validity of the OQ-45 and Basis-32. J Behav Health Serv Res 2002; 29: 394-403. (Pubitemid 38155315)
10. Hermann RC. Quality Assessment and Improvement in a Changing Healthcare System. In: Hermann RC, red. Improving mental health care. A guide to measurement-based quality improvement. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2005.
11. Holi MM, Martunen M, Aalberg V. Comparison of the GHQ-36, the GHQ-12 and the SCL-90 as psychiatric screening instruments in the Finnish population. Nord J Psychiatry 2003; 57: 233-8. (Pubitemid 36805997)
12. Hunter R, Cameron R, Norrie J. Using patient reported outcomes in schizophrenia: the Scottish Schizophrenia Outcomes Study. Psychiatr Serv 2009; 60: 240-5.
13. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 12-9.
14. Jong K de, Nugter MA, Polak MG, Wagenborg, JEA, Spinhoven, P, Heiser, W. The Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) in a Dutch population: a cross-cultural validation. Clin Psychol Psychother 2007; 14: 288-301. (Pubitemid 47316104)
15. Koeter M. Validity of the GHQ and SCL anxiety and depression scales: a comparative study. J Affect Disord 1992; 24: 271-80.
16. Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM, Umpress V, Hansen NB, Vermeersch DA, Clouse GC, e.a. The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clin Psychol Psychother 1996; 3: 249-58.
17. Lambert M, Hansen NB, Finch AE. Client focused research: using client outome data to enhance treatment effects. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69: 159-72. (Pubitemid 32488275)
18. Mulder CL, Staring ABP, Loos J, Buwalda VJA, Kuijpers D, Sytema S, e.a. De Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) als 'routine outcome assessment'. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2004; 46: 274-84.
19. Mulder CL, van der Gaag M, Bruggeman R, Cahn W, Delespaul PAE, Dries P, e.a. Routine outcome monitoring voor patiënten met ernstige psychiatrische aandoeningen; een consensusdocument Tijdschr Psychiatr 2010; 52: 169-79.
20. Orrell M, Yard P, Handysides J, Schapira R. Validity and reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in psychiatric patients in the community. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 409-12. (Pubitemid 29232093)
21. Oiesvold T, Bakkejord T, Sexton AJ. Concurrent validity of HoNOS compared with a patient derived measure (SCL-90-R) in outpatient clinics. Psychiatry Res 2011; 187: 297-300.
22. Parabiaghi A, Barbato A, D'Avanzo P, Erlicher A, Lora A. Assessing reliable and clinically significant change on health of the nation outcome scales: methods for displaying longitudinal data. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 719-25. (Pubitemid 43904374)
23. Sharma VK, Wilkinson G, Fear S. Health of the nation outcome scales: a case study in general psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 395-8. (Pubitemid 29232090)
24. Slade M, Beck A, Bindman T, Thornicroft G, Wright S. Routine clinical outcome measures for clients with severe mental illness: CANSAS and HoNOS. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 404-8. (Pubitemid 29232092)
25. Thornicroft G, Bebbington P, Leff J. Outcomes for long-term clients one year after discharge from a psychiatric hospital. Psychiatry Serv 2005; 56: 1416-22. (Pubitemid 41579777)
26. Trauer T, Callaly T, Hantz P, Little J, Shields R, Smith J. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Results of the Victorian field trial. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 380-8. (Pubitemid 29232088)
27. Umphress VJ, Lambert MJ, Smart DJ. Concurrent and construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. J Psychoeduc Assess 1997; 15: 40-55.
28. Vermeersch DA, Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM. Outcome Questionnaire: item sensitivity to change. J Pers Assess 2000; 74: 242-61. (Pubitemid 30351021)
29. Vliet van IM, Beurs de E. Het Mini internationaal neuropsychiatrisch interview. Een kort gestructureerd diagnostisch psychiatrisch interview voor DSM-IV en ICD-10 stoornissen. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2007; 49: 393-7.
30. Wilson SA, Becker LA, Tinker RH. Fifteen month follow-up of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder and psychological trauma. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997; 65: 1047-56. (Pubitemid 27522966)
31. Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park BG, Hadden S, Burns H. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): research and development. Br J of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11-8. (Pubitemid 28122520)