Outcome questionnaire: Item sensitivity to change

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 242-261

  Vermeersch, David A ^a   Lambert, Michael J ^b   Burlingame, Gary M ^b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034089436     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7402_6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anderson, E. M., & Lambert, M. J. (in press). A survival analysis of clinically significant change in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology.
3. Aneshensel, C. S., Estrada, A. L., Hansell, M. J., & Clark, V. A. (1987). Social psychological aspects of reporting behavior: Lifetime depressive episode reports. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28. 232-246.
4. Berrett, K. M. (1998). Youth Outcome Questionnaire (Y-OQ): Item sensitivity to change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
5. Bromet, E. J., Dunn, L. O., Connell, M. M., Dew, M. A., & Schulberg, H. C. (1986). Long-term reliability of diagnosing lifetime major depression in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 435-440.
6. Cattani-Thompson, K., Boroto, D. R., & Lambert, M. J. (1988, June). The phase model of psychotherapy: Explaining its application in brief psychotherapy. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Snowbird, UT.
7. Collins, L. M., & Cliff, N. (1990). Using the longitudinal Guttman simplex as a basis for measuring growth. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 128-134.
8. DeKeyser, F. G., & Pugh, L. C. (1991). Approaches to physiologic measurement. In C. F. Waltz, O. L. Strickland, & E. R. Lenz (Eds.). Measurement in nursing research (2nd ed., pp. 387-412). Philadelphia: Davis.
9. Deyo, R. A., & Inui, T. S. (1984). Toward clinical applications of health status measures: Sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Services Research, 19, 275-289.
10. Diggle, P. J., Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1994). Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
11. Durham, C., Burlingame, G. M., & Lambert, M. J. (1998). Outcome Questionnaire: Repealed administrations, mechanical responding, and social desirability. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
12. Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S., Jones, D., Spiegelhalter, D., & Cox, D. (1992). Quality of life measures in health care: I. Applications and issues in assessment. British Medical Journal, 305, 1074-1077.
13. Garfield, S. L. (1994). Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 190-228). New York: Wiley.
14. Guyatt, G. (1988). Measuring health status in chronic airflow limitation. European Respiratory Journal, 1, 560-564.
15. Guyatt, G., Walter, S., & Norman, G. (1987). Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 171-178.
16. Hansen, N. B., & Lambert, M. J. (1988, June). Differential rates of improvement on the subscales of the Outcome Questionnaire and the phase model of psychotherapy outcome: A look at construct validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Snowbird, UT.
17. Henderson, A. S., Byrne, D. G., & Duncan-Jones, P. (1981). Neurosis and the social environment. New York: Academic.
18. Jorm, A. F., Duncan-Jones, P., & Scott, R. (1989). An analysis of the re-test artefact in longitudinal studies of psychiatric symptoms and personality. Psychological Medicine, 19, 487-493.
19. Kadera, S. W., Lambert, M. J., & Andrews, A. A. (1996). How much therapy is really enough: A session-by-session analysis of the psychotherapy dose-effect relationship. Psychotherapy: Practice and Research, 5, 132-151.
20. Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27-36.
21. Kopta, S. M., Howard, K. I., Lowry, J. L., & Beutler, L. E. (1994). Patterns of symptomatic recovery: Recovery in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 1009-1016.
22. Koss, M. P., & Shiang, J. (1994). Research on brief psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 664-700). New York: Wiley.
23. Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., & Yanchar, S. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3, 249-258.
24. Lambert, M. J., & Hill, C. E. (1994). Assessing psychotherapy outcomes and processes. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 72-113). New York: Wiley.
25. Lipsey, M. W. (1983). A scheme for assessing measurement sensitivity in program evaluation and other applied research. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 152-165.
26. Lipsey, M. W. (1990). Design sensitivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Meier, S. T. (1997). Nomothetic item selection rules for tests of psychological interventions. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 419-427.
28. Polit, D. F., & Hungler, B. P. (1987). Nursing research: Principles and methods (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
29. Ray, J. W., & Shadish, W. R. (1996). How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1316-1325.
30. SAS Institute Inc. (1996). SAS\STAT: Changes and enhancements through Release 6.11. Cary, NC: Author.
31. Shaver, J. F.,& Heitkemper, M. M. (1988). Using biological measures. In N. F. Woods & M. Catanzaro (Eds.), Nursing research: Theory and practice (pp. 260-277), St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
32. Stewart, B. J., & Archbold, P. G. (1992). Nursing intervention studies require outcome measures that are sensitive to change: Part one. Research in Nursing & Health, 15, 477-481.
33. Tryon, W. W. (1991). Activity measurement in psychology and medicine. New York: Plenum.
34. Umphress, V. J., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. W., Barlow, S. H., Clouse, G. C., & Hansen, N. B. (1997). Concurrent and construct validity of the outcome questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 40-55.
35. Wells, R. A., & Phelps, P. A. (1990). The brief psychotherapies: A selective overview. In R. A. Wells & V. J. Gianetti (Eds.), Handbook of brief psychotherapies (pp. 3-26). New York: Plenum.
36. Willson, V. L., & Putnam, R. R. (1982). A meta-analysis of pretest sensitization effects in experimental design. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 249-258.
37. Windle, C. (1954). Test-retest effect on personality questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 617-633.
38. Woods, N. F. (1988). Assessing nursing research measures: Reliability and validity. In N. F. Woods & M. Catanzaro (Eds.), Nursing research: Theory and practice (pp. 246-259). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.