Incidental enhancing lesions found on preoperative breast MRI: Management and role of second-look ultrasound;Il ruolo del second-look ecografico nella caratterizzazione delle lesioni riscontrate occasionalmente alla risonanza magnetica preoperatoria della mammella

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 116, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 886-904

  Luciani, M L ^a   Pediconi, F ^a   Telesca, M ^a   Vasselli, F ^a   Casali, V ^a   Miglio, E ^a   Passariello, R ^a   Catalano, C ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast MRI; Incidental findings; Second look ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GADOBENIC ACID; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 80054906795     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0630-8     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. D. Saslow C. Boetes W. Burke, et al. 2007 American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography CA Cancer J Clin 57 75 89 17392385 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 (Pubitemid 46535708)
2. F. Sardanelli G.M. Giuseppetti G. Canavese, et al. 2008 Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007 Radiol Med 113 1085 1095 18953635 10.1007/s11547-008-0340-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7nslOjsg%3D%3D
3. N. Hylton 2005 Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: opportunities to improve breast cancer management J Clin Oncol 23 1678 1684 15755976 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.002 (Pubitemid 46217460)
4. F. Pediconi C. Catalano S. Padula, et al. 2007 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 106 65 74 17203383 10.1007/s10549-006- 9472-9 (Pubitemid 47498089)
5. C. Boetes R.D.M. Mus R. Holland, et al. 1995 Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent Radiology 197 743 747 7480749 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fnt1ylsw%3D%3D
6. A. Rieber E. Merkle W. Böhm, et al. 1997 MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 773 779 9294574 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00023 1:STN:280: DyaK2svktValtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28049627)
7. T. Hata H. Takahashi K. Watanabe, et al. 2004 Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography J Am Coll Surg 198 190 197 14759774 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.008 (Pubitemid 38175233)
8. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kuhl CK et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Magnetic Resonance Imaging. American College of Radiology, Reston
9. F. Pediconi C. Catalano R. Occhiato, et al. 2005 Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine Radiology 237 45 56 16126926 10.1148/radiol.2371041369 (Pubitemid 41346145)
10. F. Sardanelli A. Iozzelli A. Fausto, et al. 2005 Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity Radiology 235 791 797 15845796 10.1148/radiol.2353040733 (Pubitemid 40695871)
11. F. Sardanelli A. Fausto A. Esseridou, et al. 2008 Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance Invest Radiol 43 236 242 18340247 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318160678d 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjt1eku74%3D (Pubitemid 351416767)
12. F. Pediconi C. Catalano S. Padula, et al. 2008 Contrast-enhanced MR mammography: improved lesion detection and differentiation with gadobenate dimeglumine AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 1339 1346 18941066 10.2214/AJR.07.3533
13. S.G. Orel 1999 Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? Radiology 211 5 7 10189447 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gsFCntw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29161727)
14. C.K. Kuhl P. Mielcareck S. Klaschik, et al. 1999 Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211 101 110 10189459 1:STN:280: DyaK1M3gsFCmtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29161739)
15. G. Carbognin C. Calciolari V. Girardi, et al. 2010 Inflammatory breast cancer: MR imaging findings Radiol Med 115 70 82 20017008 10.1007/s11547-009- 0475-6 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c7nt1Kltw%3D%3D
16. P.J. Slanetz W.B. Edmister E.D. Yeh, et al. 2002 Occult contralateral breast carcinoma incidentally detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging Breast J 8 145 148 12047470 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08304.x (Pubitemid 34627771)
17. S.G. Lee S.G. Orel I.J. Woo, et al. 2003 MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results Radiology 226 773 778 12601182 10.1148/radiol.2263020041 (Pubitemid 36259154)
18. P. Viehweg K. Rotter M. Laniado, et al. 2004 MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy Eur Radiol 14 402 408 14531008 10.1007/s00330-003-2086-2 (Pubitemid 38324914)
19. L. Liberman E.A. Morris C.M. Kim, et al. 2003 MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 333 341 12540428 (Pubitemid 36135009)
20. C.D. Lehman J.D. Blume D. Thickman, et al. 2005 Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial J Surg Oncol 92 9 15 16180217 10.1002/jso.20350 (Pubitemid 41416422)
21. S. Komatsu C.J. Lee Y. Hosokawa, et al. 2005 A case of occult contralateral breast cancer incidentally detected by contrast-enhanced MRI; report of a case with review of literature Breast Cancer 12 341 345 16286918 10.2325/jbcs.12.341
22. F. Pediconi C. Catalano A. Roselli, et al. 2007 Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions Radiology 243 670 680 17446524 10.1148/radiol.2433060838 (Pubitemid 46799419)
23. C.L. Buchanan E.A. Morris P.L. Dorn, et al. 2005 Utility of breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with occult primary breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 12 1045 1053 16244803 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.520 (Pubitemid 41660680)
24. E.Y. Ko B.K. Han J.H. Shin S.S. Kang 2007 Breast MRI for evaluating patients with metastatic axillary lymph node and initially negative mammography and sonography Korean J Radiol 8 382 389 17923780 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.5.382
25. S. Lieberman T. Sella B. Maly, et al. 2008 Breast magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in women with occult primary breast carcinoma Isr Med Assoc J 10 448 452 18669145
26. A. Teifke H.A. Lehr T.W. Vomweg, et al. 2003 Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrastenhanced MRI of the breast AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 655 662 12933456 (Pubitemid 37021832)
27. L.R. LaTrenta J.H. Menell E.A. Morris, et al. 2003 Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US Radiology 227 856 861 12773685 10.1148/radiol.2273012210 (Pubitemid 36583048)
28. A. Linda C. Zuiani V. Londero M. Bazzocchi 2008 Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size Breast 17 51 57 17709249 10.1016/j.breast.2007.06.004 (Pubitemid 351228784)
29. J.H. Shin B.K. Han Y.H. Choe, et al. 2007 Targeted ultrasound for MRdetected lesions in breast cancer patients Korean J Radiol 8 475 483 18071277 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.6.475
30. C. Wiratkapun D. Duke A.S. Nordmann, et al. 2008 Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: value of MRIdirected breast ultrasound Acad Radiol 15 618 625 18423319 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.016 (Pubitemid 351509758)
31. W.B. Demartini P.R. Eby S. Peacock C.D. Lehman 2009 Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 1128 1134 19304724 10.2214/AJR.07.3987
32. M. Meissnitzer D.D. Dershaw C.H. Lee E.A. Morris 2009 Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 1025 1029 19770325 10.2214/AJR.09.2480
33. S. Destounis A. Arieno P.A. Somerville, et al. 2009 Community-based practice experience of unsuspected breast magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities evaluated with secondlook sonography J Ultrasound Med 28 1337 1346 19778880
34. C.K. Kuhl N. Morakkabati C.C. Leutner, et al. 2001 MR imaging-guided largecore (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone Radiology 220 31 39 11425969 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzmsVyhsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32577956)
35. E.A. Morris L. Liberman D.D. Dershaw, et al. 2002 Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 171 178 12076929
36. T. Perretta C.A. Pistolese F. Bolacchi, et al. 2008 MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum assisted breast biopsy: histological Radiol Med 113 830 840 18633687 10.1007/s11547-008-0289-y 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnpt12jtQ%3D%3D
37. G. Carbognin V. Girardi C. Calciolari, et al. 2010 Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging Radiol Med 15 1234 1245 10.1007/s11547-010-0561-9
38. M. Van Goethem K. Schelfout L. Dijckmans, et al. 2004 MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound Eur Radiol 14 809 816 14615904 10.1007/s00330-003-2146-7 (Pubitemid 38678900)
39. F. Sardanelli G.M. Giuseppetti P. Panizza, et al. 2004 Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 1149 1157 15385322 (Pubitemid 44185114)
40. S. Schrading C.K. Kuhl 2008 Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer Radiology 246 58 70 18096529 (Pubitemid 350305027)