Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: Does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer?

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 65-74

  Pediconi, Federica ^a   Catalano, Carlo ^a   Padula, Simona ^a   Roselli, Antonella ^a   Moriconi, Enrica ^a   Dominelli, Valeria ^a   Pronio, Anna Maria ^a   Kirchin, Miles A ^b   Passariello, Roberto ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b Bracco Imaging SpA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast neoplasms MR; Cancer; Contrast media; Magnetic resonance (MR)

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT CARE; PECTORAL MUSCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 34848909624     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9472-9     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888
2. Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD (2004) MRI before re-excision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:473-480
3. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R et al (1989) Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 320:822-828. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1467
4. van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS et al (1992) Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 28A:801-805
5. Veronesi U, Luini A, Galimberti V, Zurrida S (1994) Conservation approaches for the management of stage I/II carcinoma of the breast: Milan Cancer Institute trials. World J Surg 18:70-75
6. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM (1995) Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 333:1456-1461
7. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH et al (1995) Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 332:907-911
8. Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, Contesso G (1996) Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 14:1558-1564
9. Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS et al (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1143-1150
10. Dershaw DD (2002) Breast imaging and the conservative treatment of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 40:501-516 Review
11. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW et al (2002) Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52:277-300 Review
12. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276:33-38
13. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1081-1087
14. Malur S, Wurdinger S, Moritz A, Michels W, Schneider A (2001) Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res 3:55-60
15. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165-175
16. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS et al (2001) Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524-3531
17. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830-849
18. Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Dijckmans L et al (2004) MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol 14:809-816
19. Kuhl CK (2000) MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 10:46-58
20. Morris EA. (2001) Review of breast MRI: indications and limitations. Semin Roentgenol 36:226-237
21. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis and staging of breast cancer.. Radiology 220:13-30
22. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P et al (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1149-1157
23. Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.. N Engl J Med 351:427-437
24. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469-8476
25. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E (1999) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110-119
26. Tillman GF, Orel SG, Schnall MD, Schultz DJ, Tan JE, Solin LJ (2002) Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:3413-3423
27. Thibault F, Nos C, Meunier M et al (2004) MRI for surgical planning in patients with breast cancer who undergo preoperative chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1159-1168
28. Knopp MV, Bourne MW, Sardanelli F et al (2003) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI of the breast: analysis of dose response and comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:663-676
29. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Occhiato R et al (2005) Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology 237:45-56
30. Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A, Carriero A, Kirchin MA (2005) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity. Radiology 235:791-797
31. Philpotts LE (2005) Science to practice: will improved vascular mapping achieved with gadobenate dimeglumine aid in interpretation of breast MR images Radiology 235:717-718
32. American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
33. Morrow M (2005) Limiting breast surgery to the proper minimum. Breast 14:523-526 Review
34. Wallace AM, Daniel BL, Jeffrey SS et al (2005) Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization. J Am Coll Surg 200:527-537
35. Echevarria JJ, Martin M, Saiz A et al (2006) Overall breast density in MR mammography: diagnostic and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:140-147
36. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM et al (1995) Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 96:415-419
37. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Van Der Sluis RF, Ruijs JH (1997) False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7:1231-1234
38. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall MD, Solin LJ, Sullivan DC (1997) MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 202:413-420
39. Zuiani C, Francescutti GE, Londero V, Zunnui I, Bazzocchi M (2002) Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI? J Exp Clin Cancer Res 21(3 Suppl):89-95
40. Shiraishi A, Kurosaki Y, Maehara T, Suzuki M, Kurosumi M (2003) Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathological association with MR imaging and mammography. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:159-163