MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: Comparison with mammography and ultrasound

European Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 809-816

  Van Goethem, Mireille ^a,b   Schelfout, K ^a   Dijckmans, L ^a   Van Der Auwera, J C ^a   Weyler, J ^a   Verslegers, I ^a   Biltjes, I ^a   De Schepper, A ^a  

^a ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Dense breast tissue; MR mammography; Multifocal multicentric extent; Preoperative staging

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER STAGING; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; MULTIPLE CANCER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARENCHYMA; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUMOR VOLUME;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASMS, GLANDULAR AND EPITHELIAL; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 2542425642     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2146-7     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Winchester DP, Cox JD (1998) Standards for diagnosis and management of invasive breast carcinoma. American College of Radiology. American College of Surgeons. College of American pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 48:83-107
2. Ghossein NA, Alpert S, Barba J, Pressman P, Stacey P, Lorenz E, Shulman M, Sadarangani GJ (1992) Breast cancer. Importance of adequate surgical excision prior to radiotherapy in the local control of breast cancer in patients treated conservatively. Arch Surg 127:411-415
3. Schmidt-Ulrich R, Wazer DE, Tercilla O, Safaii H, Marchant DJ, Smith TJ, Homer MA, Robert NJ (1989) Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:733-738
4. Silverstein MJ, Gierson ED, Colburn WJ, Cope LM, Furmanski M, Senofsky GM et al. (1994) Can intraductal breast carcinoma be excised completely by local excision? Clinical and pathologic predictors. Cancer 73:2985-2989
5. Egan RL (1982) Multicentric breast carcinomas: clinical-radiographic-pathologic whole organ studies and 10-year survival. Cancer 49:1123-1130
6. Holland R, Connolly JL, Gelman R, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH, Verbeek AL, Schnitt SJ, Silver B, Boyages J, Harris JR (1990) The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol 8:113-118
7. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 5:1081-1087
8. Fornage B, Toubas O, Morel M (1985) Clinical, mammographic and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer 56:979-990
9. Satake H, Shimamoto K, Sawaki A, Niimi R, Ando Y, Ishiguchi T, Ishigaki T, Yamakawa K, Nagasaka T, Funahashi H (2000) Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 10:1726-1732
10. Heywang-Kobrunner S (1993) Brustkrebsdiagnostik mit MR/überblick nach 1250 patienten. Electromedica 61:43-52
11. Fischer U, Westerhof J, Brinck, Koabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E (1996) Das duktale in-situ-karzinom in der dynamischen MR-mammographie bei 1,5T. Fortschr Röntgenstr 164:290-294
12. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretière JM, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Tardivon A, Rochard F, Vanel D, Neuenschwander S, Arriagada R (1995) Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 196:415-419
13. Orel S, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, Schnall M, Solin L, Sullivan D (1997) MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 202:413-420
14. Boetes C, Strijk S, Holland R, Barentsz J, Van Der Sluis, Ruijs J (1997) False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7:1231-1234
15. Cross MJ, Harms SE, Cheek JH, Peters GN, Jones RC (1993) New horizons in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Surg 166:749-755
16. American College of Radiology (1998) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia
17. Wolfe J (1983) Xeroradiography of the breast. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois
18. StatSoft, Inc. (2002) Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, Oklahoma: StatSoft. WEB: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html
19. Saarenma I, Salminen T, Geiger U et al. (2001) The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultrasonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 67:117-123
20. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1996) Effect of age, breast density,and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. J Am Med Assoc 276:33-38
21. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888
22. Boetes C, Mus R, Holland R, Barentsz J, Strijk S, Wobbes T, Hendriks J, Ruys S (1995) Breast tumors: comparitive accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743-747
23. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207:191-199
24. Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641-649
25. Harms S, Flamig D, Hesley K, Meiches M, Jensen R, Evans W, Savino D, Wells R (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493-501
26. Gatzemeier W, Liersch T, Stylianou A, Buttler A, Becker H, Fischer U (1999) Präoperative MR mammographie beim mammacarcinom. Chirurg 70:1460-1468
27. Orel S, Schnall M, Powell C, Hochman M, Solin L, Fowble B, Torosian M, Rosato E (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:16-18
28. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs M, Davidson T, Walmsley K, Thurell W, Kissin M, Taylor I (1997) Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR 169:417-424
29. Berg W, Gilbreath P (2000) Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 214:59-66
30. Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 224:569-576
31. Kuhl C, Seibert C, Kreft B, Gieseke J, Schild H (1995) Focal and diffuse contrast enhancement in dynamic MR mammography of healthy volunteers. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 163:219-224
32. Kawashima H, Matsui O, Suzuki M, Kadoya M, Tawara M, Nonomura A, Noguchi M, Takashima T (2000) Breast cancer in dense breast: detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:233-243
33. Rieber A, Merkle E, Böhm W, Brambs H, Tomczak R (1997) MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:773-779
34. Choi B, Kim H, Kim E, Kim B, Han J, Yoo S, Park S (2002) New subtraction algorithms for evaluation of lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Eur Radiol 12:3018-3022
35. Sardinelli F, Rescinito G, Giordano G, Calabrese M, Parodi R (2000) MR dynamic enhancement of breast lesions: high temporal resolution during the first-minute versus eight minute study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:724-731
36. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X, Casselman J, Baath L, Sittek H, Stets C, Lamarque J, Andersson I, Schneider P, Taourel P, Reiser M, Heywang-Kobrunner S (2002) Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1463-1470
37. Prat X, Sittek H, Grosse A, Baath L, Perlet C, Alberich T, Lamarque J, Andersson I, Reiser M, Taourel P, Fischer H, Heywang-Kobrunner S (2002) European quadricentric evaluation of a breast and localization device: technical improvements based on phase-I evaluation. Eur Radiol 12:1720-1727