Rho GTPases mediate the mechanosensitive lineage commitment of neural stem cells

Stem Cells

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1886-1897

  Keung, Albert J ^a   De Juan Pardo, Elena M ^a,b   Schaffer, David V ^a,c   Kumar, Sanjay ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b CEIT   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adipose stem cells; Cellular mechanotransduction; Elastic modulus; Extracellular matrix; Neural stem cells; Rho GTP binding proteins

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN CDC42; RHOA GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CELL FATE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SELECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; IN VITRO STUDY; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; NERVE CELL CULTURE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RAT; STEM CELL NICHE;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CDC42 GTP-BINDING PROTEIN; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NEURAL STEM CELLS; NEUROGENESIS; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; RHO GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; RHOA GTP-BINDING PROTEIN;

EID: 80054880557     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.746     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Palmer TD, Takahashi J, Gage FH. The adult rat hippocampus contains primordial neural stem cells. Mol Cell Neurosci 1997;8:389-404. (Pubitemid 127796477)
2. Suh H, Consiglio A, Ray J et al. In vivo fate analysis reveals the multipotent and self-renewal capacities of Sox2+ neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:515-528. (Pubitemid 350056408)
3. Balu DT, Lucki I. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis: Regulation, functional implications, and contribution to disease pathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009;33:232-252.
4. Blurton-Jones M, Kitazawa M, Martinez-Coria H et al. Neural stem cells improve cognition via BDNF in a transgenic model of Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:13594-13599.
5. Sahay A, Scobie KN, Hill AS et al. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature 2011;472: 466-470.
6. Zhang C-L, Zou Y, He W et al. A role for adult TLX-positive neural stem cells in learning and behaviour. Nature 2008;451:1004-1007. (Pubitemid 351301727)
7. Zhao C, Teng EM, Summers RG et al. Distinct morphological stages of dentate granule neuron maturation in the adult mouse hippocampus. J Neurosci 2006;26:3-11. (Pubitemid 43089515)
8. Alvarez-Buylla A, Garcia-Verdugo JM. Neurogenesis in adult subventricular zone. J Neurosci 2002;22:629-634. (Pubitemid 34141742)
9. Barkho BZ, Song H, Aimone JB et al. Identification of astrocyte-expressed factors that modulate neural stem/progenitor cell differentiation. Stem Cells Dev 2006;15:407-421. (Pubitemid 44100017)
10. Kalani MYS, Cheshier SH, Cord BJ et al. Wnt-mediated self-renewal of neural stem/progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105: 16970-16975.
11. Kohyama J, Kojima T, Takatsuka E et al. Epigenetic regulation of neural cell differentiation plasticity in the adult mammalian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:18012-18017.
12. Ma DK, Jang M-H, Guo JU et al. Neuronal activity-induced Gadd45b promotes epigenetic DNA demethylation and adult neurogenesis. Science 2009;323:1074-1077.
13. Riquelme PA, Drapeau E, Doetsch F. Brain micro-ecologies: Neural stem cell niches in the adult mammalian brain. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 2008;363:123-137. (Pubitemid 350174578)
14. Schmidt MHH, Bicker F, Nikolic I et al. Epidermal growth factor-like domain 7 (EGFL7) modulates Notch signalling and affects neural stem cell renewal. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:873-880.
15. Shen Q, Goderie SK, Jin L et al. Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science 2004; 304:1338-1340. (Pubitemid 38697433)
16. Thomas CH, Collier JH, Sfeir CS et al. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:1972-1977. (Pubitemid 34168999)
17. Janmey PA. The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: Component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol Rev 1998;78:763-781. (Pubitemid 28340603)
18. Ulrich TA, de Juan Pardo EM, Kumar S. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res 2009;69:4167-4174.
19. Pelham RJ, Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:13661-13665. (Pubitemid 28009639)
20. Elkin BS, Azeloglu EU, Costa KD et al. Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:812-822. (Pubitemid 46799273)
21. Gefen A, Gefen N, Zhu QL et al. Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat. J Neurotrauma 2003; 20:1163-1177. (Pubitemid 37467280)
22. Uibo R, Laidmäe I, Sawyer ES et al. Soft materials to treat central nervous system injuries: Evaluation of the suitability of non-mammalian fibrin gels. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1793:924-930.
23. Saha K, Keung AJ, Irwin EF et al. Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys J 2008;95:4426-4438.
24. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-689. (Pubitemid 44233625)
25. Palmer TD, Markakis EA, Willhoite AR et al. Fibroblast growth factor-2 activates a latent neurogenic program in neural stem cells from diverse regions of the adult CNS. J Neurosci 1999;19:8487-8497. (Pubitemid 30226767)
26. Domke J, Radmacher M. Measuring the elastic properties of thin polymer films with the atomic force microscope. Langmuir 1998;14: 3320-3325. (Pubitemid 128559765)
27. Rosenbluth MJ, Lam WA, Fletcher DA. Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: A comparison of leukemia cell deformability. Biophys J 2006;90:2994-3003.
28. Teixeira AI, Ilkhanizadeh S, Wigenius JA et al. The promotion of neuronal maturation on soft substrates. Biomaterials 2009;30: 4567-4572.
29. Leipzig ND, Shoichet MS. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials 2009;30:6867-6878.
30. Banerjee A, Arha M, Choudhary S et al. The influence of hydrogel modulus on the proliferation and differentiation of encapsulated neural stem cells. Biomaterials 2009;30:4695-4699.
31. Ekblom P, Lonai P, Talts JF. Expression and biological role of laminin-1. Matrix Biol 2003;22:35-47. (Pubitemid 36444505)
32. Sasaki T, Giltay R, Talts U et al. Expression and distribution of Laminin α1 and α2 chains in embryonic and adult mouse tissues: An immunochemical approach. Exp Cell Res 2002;275:185-199. (Pubitemid 34948361)
33. Hsieh J, Aimone JB, Kaspar BK et al. IGF-I instructs multipotent adult neural progenitor cells to become oligodendrocytes. J Cell Biol 2004;164:111-122. (Pubitemid 38082462)
34. Abranches E, O'Neill A, Robertson MJ et al. Development of quantitative PCR methods to analyse neural progenitor cell culture state. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2006;44:1-8.
35. Hsieh J, Nakashima K, Kuwabara T et al. Histone deacetylase inhibition-mediated neuronal differentiation of multipotent adult neural progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:16659-16664. (Pubitemid 39557769)
36. Kuwabara T, Hsieh J, Nakashima K et al. A small modulatory dsRNA specifies the fate of adult neural stem cells. Cell 2004;116: 779-793. (Pubitemid 38410724)
37. Lu YB, Franze K, Seifert G et al. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:17759-17764. (Pubitemid 44852233)
38. Ravin R, Hoeppner DJ, Munno DM et al. Potency and fate specification in CNS stem cell populations in vitro. Cell Stem Cell 2008;3: 670-680.
39. Solon J, Levental I, Sengupta K et al. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J 2007;93: 4453-4461. (Pubitemid 350294491)
40. Maloney JM, Walton EB, Bruce CM et al. Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata. Phys Rev E (Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys) 2008;78:041923 1-15.
41. Allen WE, Jones GE, Pollard JW et al. Rho, Rac and Cdc42 regulate actin organization and cell adhesion in macrophages. J Cell Sci 1997; 110:707-720. (Pubitemid 27156320)
42. Lange K, Kammerer M, Saupe F et al. Combined lysophosphatidic acid/platelet-derived growth factor signaling triggers glioma cell migration in a Tenascin-C microenvironment. Cancer Res 2008;68: 6942-6952.
43. Inoue T, Do Heo W, Grimley JS et al. An inducible translocation strategy to rapidly activate and inhibit small GTPase signaling pathways. Nat Methods 2005;2:415-418. (Pubitemid 40916559)
44. Kempermann G, Jessberger S, Steiner B et al. Milestones of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 2004;27: 447-452. (Pubitemid 38951037)
45. Kempermann G, Gast D, Kronenberg G et al. Early determination and long-term persistence of adult-generated new neurons in the hippocampus of mice. Development 2003;130:391-399. (Pubitemid 36175935)
46. O'Kane EM, Stone TW, Morris BJ. Distribution of Rho family GTPases in the adult rat hippocampus and cerebellum. Mol Brain Res 2003;114:1-8. (Pubitemid 36627990)
47. Li Q, Huang X-J, He W et al. Neuroprotective potential of Fasudil Mesylate in brain ischemia-reperfusion injury of rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2009;29:169-180.
48. İnan SY, Büyükafşar K. Antiepileptic effects of two Rho-kinase inhibitors, Y-27632 and Fasudil, in mice. Br J Pharmacol 2008;155:44-51.
49. Huentelman MJ, Stephan DA, Talboom J et al. Peripheral delivery of a ROCK inhibitor improves learning and working memory. Behav Neurosci 2009;123:218-223.
50. Ding J, Li Q-Y, Yu J-Z et al. Fasudil, a Rho kinase inhibitor, drives mobilization of adult neural stem cells after hypoxia/reoxygenation injury in mice. Mol Cell Neurosci 2010;43:201-208.
51. Lu W, Wang J, Wen TQ. Downregulation of Rho-GDI gamma promotes differentiation of neural stem cells. Mol Cel Biochem 2008; 311:233-240.
52. Oh J-E, Bae G-U, Yang Y-J et al. Cdo promotes neuronal differentiation via activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. FASEB J 2009;23:2088-2099.
53. Valentijn LJ, Koppen A, van Asperen R et al. Inhibition of a new differentiation pathway in neuroblastoma by copy number defects of Nmyc, Cdc42, and nm23. Genes Cancer Res 2005;65:3136-3145. (Pubitemid 40524594)
54. Endo M, Antonyak MA, Cerione RA. Cdc42-mTOR signaling pathway controls Hes5 and Pax6 expression in retinoic acid-dependent neural differentiation. J Biol Chem 2009;284:5107-5118.
55. Suh H, Deng W, Gage FH. Signaling in adult neurogenesis. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 2009;25:253-275.
56. Sierra A, Encinas JM, Deudero JJP et al. Microglia shape adult hippocampal neurogenesis through apoptosis-coupled phagocytosis. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:483-495.
57. Jessberger S, Toni N, Clemenson GD Jr et al. Directed differentiation of hippocampal stem/progenitor cells in the adult brain. Nat Neurosci 2008;11:888-893.
58. Fu J, Wang Y-K, Yang MT et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods 2010;7:733-736.
59. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM et al. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004;6:483-495. (Pubitemid 38456178)
60. Klotzsch E, Smith ML, Kubow KE et al. Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:18267-18272.
61. Chowdhury F, Na S, Li D et al. Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nat Mater 2010;9:82-88.
62. Deisseroth K, Singla S, Toda H et al. Excitation-neurogenesis coupling in adult neural stem/progenitor cells. Neuron 2004;42:535-552. (Pubitemid 38639875)
63. Kamal A, Goldstein LSB. Connecting vesicle transport to the cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2000;12:503-508. (Pubitemid 30453603)
64. Mammoto A, Connor KM, Mammoto T et al. A mechanosensitive transcriptional mechanism that controls angiogenesis. Nature 2009; 457:1103-1108.
65. Mammoto A, Huang S, Ingber DE. Filamin links cell shape and cytoskeletal structure to Rho regulation by controlling accumulation of p190RhoGAP in lipid rafts. J Cell Sci 2007;120:456-467. (Pubitemid 46332509)
66. Martinac B. Mechanosensitive ion channels: Molecules of mechanotransduction. J Cell Sci 2004;117:2449-2460. (Pubitemid 38877841)
67. Wang J, Tolan DR, Pagliaro L. Metabolic compartmentation in living cells: Structural association of aldolase. Exp Cell Res 1997;237:445-451. (Pubitemid 28027939)
68. Sack I, Beierbach B, Wuerfel J et al. The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity. Neuroimage 2009;46:652-657.
69. Horner PJ, Gage FH. Regenerating the damaged central nervous system. Nature 2000;407:963-970.
70. Unsgaard G, Rygh OM, Selbekk T et al. Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir 2006;148:235-253. (Pubitemid 43341021)
71. Woerly S, Doan VD, Sosa N et al. Prevention of gliotic scar formation by NeuroGelTM allows partial endogenous repair of transected cat spinal cord. J Neurosci Res 2004;75:262-272. (Pubitemid 38049397)
72. Levental KR, Yu H, Kass L et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 2009;139:891-906.