Matching Math Interventions to Students' Skill Deficits: A Preliminary Investigation of a Conceptual and Procedural Heuristic

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 210-218

  Burns, Matthew K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual knowledge; Math; Math intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054875804     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1534508411413255     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. C. (2003). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
2. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 51-73.
3. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGaw-Hill.
4. Burns, M. K. (2004). Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 167-175.
5. Burns, M. K. (2005). Using incremental rehearsal to practice multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 237-249. (Pubitemid 44699612)
6. Burns, M. K., & Boice, C. H. (2009). Comparison of the relationship between words retained and intelligence for three instructional strategies among students with low IQ. School Psychology Review, 38, 284-292.
7. Burns, M. K., Codding, R. S., Boice, C. H., & Lukito, G. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill by treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39, 69-83.
8. Burns, M. K., Dean, V. J., & Foley, S. (2004). Preteaching unknown key words with incremental rehearsal to improve reading fluency and comprehension with children identified as reading disabled. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 303-314. (Pubitemid 40533698)
9. Burns, M. K., & Klingbeil, D. A. (2010). Assessment of academic skills in math within a problem solving model. In R. Ervin, G. Gimpel, E. Daly III, & K. Merrell (Eds.), Practical handbook of school psychology (pp. 86-98). New York, NY: Guilford.
10. Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Jiban, C. (2006). Assessing the instructional level for mathematics: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 35, 401-418. (Pubitemid 44672395)
11. Canobi, K. C., Reeve, R. A., & Pattison, P. E. (2002). Young children's understanding of addition concepts. Educational Psychology, 22, 513-532.
12. Canobi, K., Reeve, R., & Pattison, P. E. (2003). Patterns of knowledge in children's addition. Developmental Psychology, 39, 521-534. (Pubitemid 37189411)
13. Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Jitendra, A. (2008). Systems of instruction and assessment to improve mathematics achievement for students with disabilities: The potential and promise of RTI. In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Educating individuals with disabilities: IDEIA 2004 and beyond (pp. 227-248). New York, NY: Springer.
14. Cowan, R., Dowker, A., Christakis, A., & Bailey, S. (1996). Even more precisely assessing children's understanding of the order-irrelevance principle. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 84-101.
15. Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.
16. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.
17. Delazer, M., & Benke T. (1997). Arithmetic facts without meaning. Cortex, 33, 697-710. (Pubitemid 28014866)
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergarteners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. Elementary School Journal, 101, 495-510.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Hamlett, C. L., Finelli, R., & Courey, S. J. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 635-647. (Pubitemid 39666165)
20. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343-1359.
21. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293-304. (Pubitemid 41095919)
22. Hanich, L. B., Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615-626.
23. Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional technology: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23-40). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
24. Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Hintze, J. M., Christ, T. J., & Keller, L. A. (2002). The generalizability of CBM survey-level mathematics assessments: Just how many samples do we need? School Psychology Review, 31, 514-528. (Pubitemid 36507757)
26. Jitendra, A., DiPipi, C. M., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory student of schema-based word problem-solving instruction for middle-school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. Journal of Special Education, 36, 23-38.
27. Jolivette, K., Lingo, A. S., Houchins, D. E., Barton-Arwood, S. M., & Shippen, M. E. (2006). Building math fluency for students with developmental disabilities and attentional difficulties using great leaps math. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 392-400. (Pubitemid 44832360)
28. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281-326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.
29. Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Finell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.
31. Learning Resources. (n.d.-a). Hands-on standards photo-illustrated lessons for teaching with math manipulatives grades 3-4. Vernon Hills, IL: Author.
32. Learning Resources. (n.d.-b). Hands-on standards photo-illustrated lessons for teaching with math manipulatives grades 1-2. Vernon Hills, IL: Author.
33. LeFevre, J. A., Smith-Chant, B. L., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S. L., Sargla, E., Arnup, J. S., . . . Kamawar, D. (2006). What counts as knowing? The development of conceptual and procedural knowledge of counting from kindergarten through grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 285-303. (Pubitemid 43380622)
34. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 9 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.
37. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: Final report of the national math advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
38. Nist, L., & Joseph L. M. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of flashcard drill instructional methods on urban first-graders' word recognition, acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. School Psychology Review, 37, 294-208.
39. Northwest Evaluation Association. (2004). Measures of academic progress. Lake Oswego, OR: Author.
40. Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 3-21). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
41. Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Burns, M. K. (2009). Single case design for measuring response to educational intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.
42. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1998). The relation between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics: A review. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skill (pp. 75-110). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
43. Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Wagner, M. A. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346-362.
44. Rivera, D. M., & Bryant, B. R. (1992). Mathematics instruction for students with special needs. Intervention in School & Clinic, 28, 71-86.
45. Saffer, N. (1999). Core subjects and your career. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 43(2), 26-40.
46. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing singlesubject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221-242. (Pubitemid 28311970)
47. Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum based measurement: Assessing special children. New York, NY: Guilford.
48. Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324-328. (Pubitemid 41815541)
49. Tucker, J. A. (1989). Basic flashcard technique when vocabulary is the goal. Unpublished teaching materials, School of Education, University of Chattanooga. Chattanooga, TN: Author.
50. VanDeWalle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
51. Xin, Y. P., Jitendra, A. K., & Deatline-Buchman, A. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. Journal of Special Education, 39, 181-192. (Pubitemid 41616841)
52. Zamarian, L., Lopez-Rolon, A., & Delazer, M. (2007). Neuropsychological case studies on arithmetic processing. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 245-264). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
53. Zentall, S. Z. (2007). Math performance of students with ADHD: Cognitive and behavioral contributors and interventions. In D.B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 219-244). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.