The social psychology of intergroup relations

Handbook on Peace Education

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 75-86

  Tausch, Nicole ^a   Schmid, Katharina ^b   Hewstone, Miles ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054867734     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
3. Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom. New York: Longman
4. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and signifi cance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114
5. Berry, J. K., Kim, V., Minde, T., & Mok, D. (1987). Comparative studies of acculturative stress. International Migration Review, 21, 491-511
6. Bettencourt, B. A., Brewer, M., Croak, R., & Miller, N. (1992). Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias: The role of reward structure and social orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 301-319
7. Bettencourt, B. A., Charlton, K., & Kernahan, C. (1997). Numerical representation of groups in cooperative settings: Social orientation effects on ingroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 630-659
8. Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Theno, S. A. (1996). Violating American values: A 'value congruence' approach to understanding out-group attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 387-410
9. Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657
10. Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482
11. Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identifi cation and intergroup confl ict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup confl ict, and confl ict reduction (pp. 17-41). New York: Oxford University Press
12. Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. New York: Sage
13. Brewer, M. B., & Gaertner, S. L. (2001). Toward reduction of prejudice: Intergroup contact and social categorisation. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 451-474). Oxford: Blackwell
14. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). Orlando: Academic Press
15. Brown, R., & Abrams, D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78-92
16. Brown, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255-331
17. Cairns, E. (1982). Intergroup confl ict in Northern Ireland. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 277-298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
18. Cairns, E., & Darby, J. (1998). The confl ict in Northern Ireland: Causes, consequences and controls. American Psychologist, 53, 757-760
19. Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 283-311). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
20. Church, A. T. (1982). Sojourner adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 540-572
21. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Multiple categorization and implicit intergroup bias: Differential category dominance and the positive-negative asymmetry effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 45-62
22. Deaux, K. (1996). Social identifi cation. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford Press
23. Eidelson, R. J., & Eidelson, J. I. (2003). Dangerous ideas: Five beliefs that propel groups toward confl ict. American Psychologist, 59, 182-192
24. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389
25. Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (2002). The out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 313-329
26. Esses, V. M., Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In D. L. Mackie & D. M. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 137-166). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
27. Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group confl ict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699-724
28. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327
29. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing ingroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press
30. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J., Banker, B., Ward, C. M., et al. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388-402
31. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692-704
32. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Murrell, A. J., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefi ts of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249
33. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B., & Anastasio, P. (1996). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 230-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
34. González, R., & Brown, R. (2006). Dual identities in intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 753-767
35. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308-318
36. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480
37. Grieve, P. G., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 926-940
38. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization and the perceived homogeneity of ingroups and outgroups: The interaction between social motivation and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 182-222). New York: Guilford Press
39. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis.' In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and confl ict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford: Blackwell
40. Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Paolini, S., McLernon, F., Crisp, R., et al. (2005). Intergroup contact in a divided society: Challenging segregation in Northern Ireland. In D. Abrams, J. M. Marques, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 265-292). Philadelphia: Psychology Press
41. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Social Psychology, 53, 575-604
42. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf
43. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subgroup relations: Two experiments comparing subgroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256
44. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156
45. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710
46. Jackson, J. W. (1993). Realistic group confl ict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. Psychological Record, 43, 395-414
47. Jetten, J., & Spears, R. (2003). The divisive potential of differences and similarities: The role of intergroup distinctiveness in intergroup differentiation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 203-242). Hove: Psychology Press
48. Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
49. Leonardelli, G. J., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Minority and majority discrimination: When and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 468-485
50. McCauley, C. (2002). Head-fi rst versus feet-fi rst in peace education. In G. Salomon & B. Nevo (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world (pp. 247-257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
51. McCauley, C., Wright, M., & Harris, M. (2000). Diversity workshops on campus: A survey of current practice at U.S. colleges and universities. College Student Journal, 34, 100-114
52. McGregor, H. A., Lieberman, J. D., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., Simon, L., et al. (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldviewthreatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590-605
53. Miller, N., Brewer, M. B., & Edwards, K. (1985). Cooperative interaction in desegregated settings: A laboratory analogue. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 63-79
54. Mummendey, A. (1995). Positive distinctiveness and social discrimination: An old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 657-670
55. Mummendey, A., Simon, B., Dietze, C., Grünert, M., Haeger, G., Kessler, S., et al. (1992). Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 125-144
56. Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford: Blackwell
57. Otten, S., Mummendey, A., & Blanz, M. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568-581
58. Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339-367
59. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85
60. Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profi les in controversy (pp. 53-84). New York: Plenum
61. Sherif, M. (1966). Group confl ict and cooperation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
62. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup confl ict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press
63. Simon, B., Aufderheide, B., & Kampmeier, C. (2001). The social psychology of minority-majority relations. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 303-323). Oxford: Blackwell
64. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identifi cation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553
65. Struch, N., & Schwarz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness form in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364-373
66. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
67. Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups (pp. 27-60). London: Academic Press
68. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
69. Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. P. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178
70. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup confl ict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
71. Tausch, N., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., & Cairns, E. (2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identifi cation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541-556
72. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
73. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S .A., & McGarty, C. A. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463
74. Vanbeselaere, N. (1991). The different effects of simple and crossed categorizations: A result of the category differentiation process or of the differential category salience? In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 247-278). New York: Wiley
75. Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identifi-cation in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 153-172
76. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., Weber, U., & Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461-473
77. Worchel, S., Andreoli, V. A., & Folger, R. (1977). Intergroup cooperation and intergroup attraction: The effect of previous interaction and outcome of combined effort. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 131-140