Relationship between visual binding, reentry and awareness

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1293-1303

  Koivisto, Mika ^a   Silvanto, Juha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Awareness; Binding; Consciousness; Illusory conjunctions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MEMORY; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PHENOMENOLOGY; VISUAL AWARENESS; VISUAL BINDING; VISUAL REENTRY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADULT; AWARENESS; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054851238     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blaser E., Papathomasz T., Vidnyánszky Z. Binding of motion and colour is early and automatic. European Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 21:2040-2044.
2. Bodelón C., Fallah M., Reynolds J.H. Temporal resolution for the perception of features and conjunctions. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27:725-730.
3. Boehler C.N., Schoenfeld M.A., Heinze H.-J., Hopf J.-M. Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:8742-8747.
4. Bouvier S., Treisman A. Visual feature binding requires reentry. Psychological Science 2010, 21:200-204.
5. Boyer J.L., Harrison S., Ro T. Unconscious processing of orientation and color without primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:16875-16879.
6. Braet W., Humphreys G.W. The role of reentrant processes in feature binding: Evidence from neuropsychology and TMS on late onset illusory conjunctions. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:25-47.
7. Bullier J. Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Research Reviews 2001, 36:96-107.
8. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:481-507.
9. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Object substitution without reentry?. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 2002, 131:594-596.
10. Donk M. Illusory conjunctions are an illusion: the effects of target-nontarget similarity on conjunction and feature errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1207-1233.
11. Donk M. Illusory conjunctions die hard: a reply to Prinzmetal, Diedrichsen, and Ivry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:542-546.
12. Enns J.T. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Research 2004, 44:1321-1331.
13. Francis G., Hermens F. Comment on " Competition for Consciousness Among Visual Events: The Psychophysics of Reentrant Visual Processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:590-593.
14. Hochstein S., Ahissar M. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 2002, 36:791-804.
15. Holcombe A.O., Cavanagh P. Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:127-128.
16. Humphreys G.W. A multi-stage account of binding in vision: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition 2001, 08:381-410.
17. Koivisto M., Mäntylä T., Silvanto J. The role of early visual cortex (V1/V2) in conscious and unconscious visual perception. Neuroimage 2010, 51:828-834.
18. Koivisto M., Revonsuo A. Event-related brain correlates of visual awareness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2010, 34:922-934.
19. Lamme V.A.F. Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks 2004, 17:861-872.
20. Lamme V.A.F., Roelfsema P.R. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neuroscience 2000, 23:571-579.
21. Melcher D., Papathomas T.V., Vidnyánszky Z. Implicit attentional selection of bound visual features. Neuron 2005, 46:723-729.
22. Melcher D., Vidnyánszky Z. Subthreshold features of visual objects: unseen but not unbound. Vision Research 2006, 46:1863-1867.
23. Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V. Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science 2001, 292:510-512.
24. Prinzmetal W., Ivry R.B., Beck D. A Measurement Theory of Illusory Conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:251-269.
25. Ro T., Breitmeyer B., Burton P., Singhal N., Lane D. Feedback contributions to visual awareness in human occipital cortex. Current Biology 2003, 11:1038-1041.
26. Roelfsema P.R. Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2006, 29:203-227.
27. Sandberg K., Timmermans B., Overgaard M., Cleeremans A. Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other?. Consciousness & Cognition 2010, 19:1069-1078.
28. Silvanto J., Lavie N., Walsh V. Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1736-1741.
29. Treisman A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 1998, B353:1295-1306.
30. Treisman A. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1996, 6:171-178.
31. Treisman A., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review 1988, 95:15-48.
32. Treisman A., Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:107-141.
33. Vorberg D., Mattler U., Heinecke A., Schmidt T., Schwarzbach J. Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100:6275-6280.
34. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R. The psychophysical evidence for a binding problem in human vision. Neuron 1999, 24:11-17.