Visual feature binding requires reentry

Psychological Science

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 200-204

  Bouvier, Seth ^a   Treisman, Anne ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Feature binding; Feature integration; Object substitution masking; Reentry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; JUDGMENT; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING;

EID: 77951274374     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797609357858     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ashbridge, E., Walsh, V., & Cowey, A. (1997). Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1121-1131.
2. Boehler, C.N., Schoenfeld, M.A., Heinze, H.-J., & Hopf, J.-M. (2008). Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 8742-8747.
3. Braet, W., & Humphreys, G.W. (2009). The role of reentrant processes in feature binding: Evidence from neuropsychology and TMS on late onset illusory conjunctions. Visual Cognition, 17, 25-47.
4. Brainard, D.H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
5. Carlson, T.A., Rauschenberger, R., & Verstraten, F.A.J. (2007). No representation without awareness in the lateral occipital cortex. Psychological Science, 18, 298-302.
6. Corbetta, M., Shulman, G.L., Miezin, F.M., & Petersen, S.E. (1995). Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science, 270, 802-805.
7. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
8. Enns, J.T. (2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Research, 44, 1321-1331.
9. Evans, K.K., & Treisman, A. (2005). Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention free? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1476-1492.
10. Friedman-Hill, S.R., Robertson, L.C., & Treisman, A.M. (1995). Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science, 269, 853-855.
11. Gellatly, A., Pilling, M., Cole, G., & Skarratt, P. (2006). What is being masked in object substitution masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1422-1435.
12. Hamker, F.H. (2005). The reentry hypothesis: The putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 431-447.
13. Killeen, P.R. (2005). An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science, 16, 345-353.
14. Reiss, J.E., & Hoffman, J.E. (2007). Disruption of early face recogni-tion processes by object substitution masking. Visual Cognition, 15, 789-798.
15. Serre, T., Oliva, A., & Poggio, T. (2007). A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 6424-6429.
16. Spratling, M.W., & Johnson, M.H. (2004). A feedback model of visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 219-237.
17. Treisman, A.M. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.
18. Treisman, A.M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
19. Treisman, A.M., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
20. Wolfe, J.M., & Bennett, S.C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.
21. Wolfe, J.M., & Cave, K.R. (1999). The psychophysical evidence for a binding problem in human vision. Neuron, 24, 11-17.
22. Woodman, G.F., & Luck, S.J. (2003). Dissociations among attention, perception, and awareness during object-substitution masking. Psychological Science, 14, 605-611.