Temporal resolution for the perception of features and conjunctions

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 725-730

  Bodelón, Clara ^a   Fallah, Mazyar ^a   Reynolds, John H ^a  

^a SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Color; Integration; Orientation; Perception; Psychophysics; Temporal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

COLOR PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846649151     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 02706474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3860-06.2007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Science 16:101-133.
2. Friedman-Hill SR, Robertson LC, Treisman A (1995) Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 265:853-855.
3. Gawne TJ, Kjaer TW, Richmond BJ (1996) Latency: another potential code for feature binding in striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 76:1356-1360.
4. Ghose GM, Maunsell J (1999) Specialized representation in visual cortex: a role for binding? Neuron 24:79-80.
5. Gross CG, Bender DB, Rocha-Miranda CE (1969) Visual receptive fields of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the monkey. Science 166:1303-1306.
6. Holcombe AO, Cavanagh P (2001) Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nat Neurosci 4:127-128.
7. Hu X, Batchelder WH (1994) The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika 59:21-47.
8. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1965) Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J Neurophysiol 28:229-289.
9. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 195:215-243.
10. Maunsell JH, Newsome WT (1987) Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 10:363-401.
11. Newcombe RG (1998) Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on pair data. Stat Med 17:2635-2650.
12. Oram MW, Perrett DI (1992) Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and head. J Neurophysiol 68:70-84.
13. Palmer J, Huk AC, Shadlen MN (2005) The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J Vis 5:376-404.
14. Ratcliff R (1980) A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time. J Math Psychol 21:178-184.
15. Riefer DM, Batchelder WH (1988) Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychol Rev 95:318-339.
16. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (1999) Are cortical models really bound by the "binding problem"? Neuron 24:87-93.
17. Rousselet GA, Fabre-Thorpe M, Thorpe SJ (2002) Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nat Neurosci 5:629-630.
18. Shadlen MN, Movshon JA (1999) Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24:67-77.
19. Sincich LC, Horton JC (2005) The circuitry of V1 and V2: integration of color, form, and motion. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:303-326.
20. Smith PL, Ratcliff R, Wolfgang BJ (2004) Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Vision Res 44:1297-1320.
21. Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit Psychol 12:97-136.
22. Treisman AM, Schmidt H (1982) Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognit Psychol 14:107-141.
23. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Analysis of visual behavior (Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW, eds), pp 288-321. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
24. Wallis G, Rolls ET (1997) Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system. Prog Neurobiol 51:167-194.
25. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001a) The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63:1293-1313.
26. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001b) The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Pyschophys 63:1314-1329.
27. Wolfe JM, Bennett SC (1997) Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Res 37:25-43.
28. Wolfe JM, Cave KR, Franzel SL (1989) Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:419-433.
29. Zeki S, Shipp S (1989) Modular connections between areas V2 and V4 of macaque monkey visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci 1:494-506.