Comparison of progressive prompt delay with and without instructive feedback

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 327-340

  Reichow, Brian ^a   Wolery, Mark ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

autism spectrum disorders; instructional efficiency; instructive feedback; progressive prompt delay; response prompting

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT; TEACHING;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TEACHING;

EID: 80054844257     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: 19383703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-327     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anthony, L., Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Caldwell, N. K., &, Snyder, E. D., (1996). Effects of daily probing on acquisition of instructive feedback responses. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 111-133.
2. Ault, M. J., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., &, Eizenstat, V., (1988). Comparison of response prompting procedures in teaching numeral identification to autistic subjects. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 627-636.
3. Baer, D. M., Peterson, R. F., &, Sherman, J. A., (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405-416.
4. Bandura, A., (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., &, Munson, R., (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
6. Caldwell, N. K., Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., &, Caldwell, Y., (1996). Embedding instructive feedback into teacher-student interactions during independent seat work. Journal of Behavior Education, 6, 459-480.
7. Eldevik, S., Hastings, R. P., Hughes, J. C., Jahr, E., Eikeseth, S., &, Cross, S., (2009). Meta-analysis of early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38, 439-450.
8. Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., &, Baklarz, J. L., (1991). Acquisition of incidental information during small group instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 1-18.
9. Gilliam, J. E., (1995). Gilliam autism rating scale. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
10. Griffen, A. K., Schuster, J. W., &, Morse, T. E., (1998). The acquisition of instructive feedback: A comparison of continuous versus intermittent presentation schedules. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 42-61.
11. Harlow, H. F., (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65.
12. Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., &, Hrenkevich, P., (1993). Effects of instructive feedback on future learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 259-285.
13. Kennedy, C. H., (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Ledford, J. R., Gast, D. L., Luscre, D., &, Ayres, K. M., (2008). Observational and incidental learning by children with autism during small group instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 86-103.
15. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., &, Lisi, S., (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
16. MacDuff, G. S., Krantz, P. J., &, McClannahan, L. E., (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In, C. Maurice, G. Green, &, R. M. Foxx, (Eds.), Making a difference: Behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 37-50. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17. Reichow, B., &, Wolery, M., (2009). Comprehensive synthesis of early intensive behavioral interventions for young children with autism based on the UCLA Young Autism Project Model. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 23-41.
18. Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., &, Wilson, R. J., (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67-76.
19. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., &, Cicchetti, D. V., (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
20. Voress, J. K., &, Maddox, T., (1998). Developmental assessment of young children. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
21. Walker, G., (2008). Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: A literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 261-275.
22. Werts, M. G., Caldwell, N. K., &, Wolery, M., (2003). Instructive feedback: Effects of a presentation variable. Journal of Special Education, 37, 124-133.
23. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., &, Frederick, C., (1993). Effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behaviors. Exceptionality, 4, 81-95.
24. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., &, Gast, D. L., (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55-75.
25. Wolery, M., (in press). Studying response prompting strategies. In, C. H. Kennedy, C. G. Breen, &, C. A. Peck, (Eds.), Context, intervention, and disability: Essays in honor of Thomas G. Haring. New York: Routledge.
26. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., &, Doyle, P. M., (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. New York: Longmann.
27. Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Meyer, S., &, Stinson, D., (1991). Effects of presenting incidental information in consequent events on future learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 79-104.
28. Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Holcombe, A., Billings, S. S., &, Vassilaros, M. A., (1993). Instructive feedback: A comparison of simultaneous and alternating presentation of non-target stimuli. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 187-204.
29. Wolery, T. D., Schuster, J. W., &, Collins, B. C., (2000). Effects on future learning of presenting non-target stimuli in antecedent and consequent conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 77-94.