Effects of daily probing on acquisition of instructive feedback responses

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 111-133

  Anthony, Leslie ^a   Wolery, Mark ^a,b   Werts, Margaret G ^a   Caldwell, Nicola K ^a   Snyder, Erin D ^a  

^a ALLEGHENY SINGER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Constant time delay; Daily probing; Instructive feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043108036     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02110228     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
2. California Testing Bureau (1992). California Achievement Test-5. Monterey, CA: McGraw-Hill.
3. Dunn, L. J., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
4. Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Baklarz, J. L. (1991). Acquisition of incidental information during small group instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 1-18.
5. Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Kolenda, J. L. (1994). Instructive feedback: Effects of number and type. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 313-334.
6. Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
7. Micrografx Charisma [Computer software]. (1990). Richardson, TX: Micrografx.
8. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
9. Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
10. Werts, M. G., Caldwell, N. K., & Wolery, M. (1996). Instructive feedback: Effects of a presentation variable. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Gast, D. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55-75.
12. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains, NY: Longman.
13. Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C. A., Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239-266.
14. Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Werts, M. G., & Cipollone, R. M. (1993). Effects of simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback. Early Education and Development, 4, 20-31.
15. Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., & Holcombe, A. (1993). Reflections on effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behavior. Exceptionality, 4, 117-123.
16. Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Holcombe, A., Billings, S. S., & Vassilaros, M. A. (1993). Instructive Feedback: A comparison of simultaneous and alternating presentation of non-target stimuli. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 187-204.