Effects on future learning of presenting non-target stimuli in antecedent and consequent conditions

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 10, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 77-94

  Wolery, Tim D ^a   Schuster, John W ^b   Collins, Belva C ^b  

^a Shelby County Schools   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Constant time delay; Future learning; Instructional efficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038279056     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016679928480     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alig-Cybriwsky, C. A., Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1990). Use of a constant time delay procedure in teaching preschoolers in a group format. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 99-116.
2. Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Comparison of progressive and constant time delay procedures in teaching community-sign word reading. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 93, 44-56.
3. Billingsley, F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
4. Blackhurst, A. E., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1996). The single subject research advisor [Computer software]. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
5. Collins, B. C., Branson, T. A., & Hall, M. (1995). Teaching generalized reading of cooking product labels to adolescents with mental disabilities through the use of key words taught by peer tutors. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 65-67.
6. Cromer, K. L., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Grisham-Brown, J. (1998). Teaching information on medical prescriptions using two different instructive feedback schedules. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 37-61.
7. Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Meyer, S. (1992). Teaching discrete skills to students with moderate mental retardation in small-group instructional arrangements. Exceptionality, 3, 233-253.
8. Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., & Meyer, S. (1996). Embedding extra stimuli in the task direction: Effects on learning of students with moderate mental retardation. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 381-399.
9. Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., Ault, M. J., & Wiley, K. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching preschoolers with developmental delays. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 1-
10. Griffen, A. K., Schuster, J. W., & Morse, T. E. (1998). The acquisition of instructive feedback: A comparison of continuous versus intermittent presentation schedules. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 42-61.
11. Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., & Hrenkevich, P. (1993). Effects of instructive feedback on future learning. Journal of Behavior Education, 3, 285-359.
12. Jones, G. Y., & Collins, B. C. (1997). Teaching microwave skills to adults with disabilities: Acquisition of nutrition and safety facts presented as non-targeted information. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 59-78.
13. Schuster, J. W., Griffen, A. K., & Wolery, M. (1992). Comparison of the simultaneous prompting procedure and constant time delay procedure in teaching sight words to elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 305-325.
14. Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67-76.
15. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Gast, D. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55-75.
16. Winterling, V. (1990). The effects of constant time delay, practice in writing or spelling, and reinforcement on sight word recognition in a small group. Journal of Special Education, 24, 101-116.
17. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe handicaps: Use of response prompting procedures. White Plains, NY: Longman.
18. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Mills, B. (1990). Use of choral and individual attentional responses with constant time delay when teaching sight word reading. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 47-58.
19. Wolery, M., Bailey, D. B., & Sugai, G. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis for exceptional students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Wolery, M., Doyle, P. M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Meyer, S., & Stinson, D. (1991). Effects of presenting incidental information in consequent events on future learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 79-104.
21. Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C. A., Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239-266.