College-level instruction: Derived relations and programmed instruction

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 413-416

  Fienup, Daniel M ^a   Hamelin, Jeffery ^b   Reyes Giordano, Kimberly ^b   Falcomata, Terry S ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

college students; derived relations; programmed instruction

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; STUDENT; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY;

HUMANS; LEARNING; PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION AS TOPIC; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 80054841830     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: 19383703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-413     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Critchfield, T. S., &, Fienup, D. M., (2008). Stimulus equivalence. In, S. F. Davis, &, W. F. Buskist, (Eds.), 21st century psychology (pp. 360-372. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Critchfield, T. S., &, Fienup, D. M., (2010). Using stimulus equivalence technology to teach about statistical inference in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 437-462.
3. Fields, L., Travis, R., Yadlovker, E. D., Roy, D., Aguiar-Rocha, L., &, Sturmey, P., (2009). Equivalence class formation: A method for teaching statistical interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 575-593.
4. Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., &, Critchfield, T. S., (2010). Teaching brain-behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 19-33.
5. Fienup, D. M., &, Critchfield, T. S., (2010). Efficiently establishing concepts of inferential statistics and hypothesis decision making through contextually controlled equivalence classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 437-462.
6. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., &, McCord, B. E., (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147-185.
7. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., &, Roche, B., (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
8. Joyce, B. G., &, Joyce, J. H., (1993). Using stimulus equivalence procedures to teach relationships between English and Spanish words. Education & Treatment of Children, 16, 48-65.
9. LeBlanc, L. A., Miguel, C. F., Cummings, A. R., Goldsmith, T. R., &, Carr, J. E., (2003). The effects of three stimulus-equivalence testing conditions on emergent US geography relations of children diagnosed with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 279-289.
10. Ninness, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Ford, A. M., Payne, R., et al., (2006). Transformations of mathematical and stimulus functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 299-321.
11. Ninness, C., Dixon, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rehfeldt, R. A., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., et al., (2009). Constructing and deriving reciprocal trigonometric relations: A functional analytic approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 191-208.
12. Stromer, R., Mackay, H. A., &, Stoddard, L. T., (1992). Classroom applications of stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 225-256.
13. Toussaint, K. A., &, Tiger, J. H., (2010). Teaching early braille literacy skills within a stimulus equivalence paradigm to children with degenerative visual impairments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 181-194.
14. Walker, B. D., Rehfeldt, R. A., &, Ninness, C., (2010). Using the stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach course material in an undergraduate rehabilitation course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 615-633.