Transformations of mathematical and stimulus functions

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 299-321

  Ninness, Chris ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b   Rumph, Robin ^a   McCuller, Glen ^a   Ford, Angela M ^a   Payne, Robert ^a   Ninness, Sharon K ^a   Smith, Ronald J ^a   Ward, Todd A ^a   Elliott, Marc P ^a  

^a STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Combinatorial entailment; Mutual entailment; Preference; Transformation of function; Value

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS;

ADULT; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MATHEMATICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33748938405     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2006.139-05     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barnes-Holmes, D., O'Hora, D., Roche, R., Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R. T., & Lyddy, F. (2001). Understanding and verbal regulations. In S. C. Hayes, D. BarnesHolmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 103-117). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
2. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. (2001). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 589-604.
3. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with more-than and less-than as a generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Theory, 4, 531-558.
4. Biggs, J., & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
5. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163-197.
6. Dougher, M. J., & Markham, M. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 71-90). Reno, NV: Context Press.
7. Dubinsky, E., & Schwingendorf, K. (1991). Constructing calculus concepts: Cooperation in a computer laboratory. In L. C. Leinbach (Ed.), The laboratory approach to teaching calculus (pp. 47-70). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
8. Finney, R. L., Weir, M. D., & Giordano, F. R. (2001). Thomas'calculus (10th ed.). Boston: Addison, Wcsley, Longman.
9. Hayes, S. C., & Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 225-233.
10. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language ana cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
11. Kennedy, P. A., McGowan, D., Schultz, J. E., Hollowell, K., & Jovell, I. (1998). Algebra one interactions: Course 1. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
12. Kohlenberg, B. S., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of contextual control over equivalence classes through equivalence classes: A possible model of social stereotyping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 505-518.
13. Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-organizing maps (3rd ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
14. Lane, S. D., Clow, J. K., Innis, A., & Critchfield, T. S. (1998). Generalization of cross-modal equivalence classes: Operant processes as components in human category formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 267-279.
15. Larson, R., & Hostetler, R. P. (1997). Algebra and trigonometry (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Larson, R., & Hostetler, R. P. (2001). Intermediate algebra (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Leader, G., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Establishing fractional-decimal equivalence using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 51, 151-165.
18. Lynch, D. C., & Cuvo, A. J. (1995). Stimulus equivalence instruction of fraction-decimal relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 115-126.
19. Macmillan, A. (1990). Constructivism in a kindergarten mathematics class. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2, 12-27.
20. Ninness, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Ford, A., & Holland, J., et al. (2006, May). Transformations of web-based trigonometric and stimulus functions: Accelerating the acquisition of derived complex mathematical relations. Paper presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Atlanta, GA.
21. Ninness, C., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Harrison, C., Ford, A. M., & Ninness, S. (2005). A functional analytic approach to computer-interactive mathematics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysts, 38, 1-22.
22. Ninness, C., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Vasquez, E., Harrison, C., & Ford, A. M., et al. (2005). A relational frame and artificial neural network approach to computer-interactive mathematics. The Psychological Record, 51, 561-570.
23. O'Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51-76.
24. Programme for International Student Assessment. (2003). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Retrieved December 22, 2005, from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf
25. Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, S. L. (2005). Establishing derived requesting skills in adults with severe developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 101-105.
26. Saxon, J. H. (1997) Algebra It An incremental development (3rd ed.). Norman, OK: Saxon Publishers.
27. Slavin, R. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28. Smith, K. (1998), Trigonometry for college students. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29. Steen, L. A. (2003). Issues in science and technology online. Math education at risk. Retrieved December 26, 2005, from http://www.issues.org/issues/19.4/steen.html
30. Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S. C., & Lipkens, R. (2001). Relations among relations: Analogies, metaphors, and stories. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 73-86). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
31. Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). A functional-analytic model of analogy: A relational frame analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375-396.
32. Sullivan, M. (2002). Precalculs (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Texas Education Agency, Student Assessment Division. (2002). Released tests, answer keys, and scoring guides (algebra I). Retrieved February 20, 2006, from www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/online/2002/eoc/algebra.html
34. Van Houten, R. (1980).' Learning through feedback: A systematic approach for improving academic performance (pp. 24-25). New York: Human Sciences Press.