A schedule-based assignment model with explicit capacity constraints for congested transit networks

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 16-33

  Nuzzolo, Agostino ^a   Crisalli, Umberto ^a   Rosati, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Capacity constraints; Congestion; Dynamic assignment; Schedule based; Transit networks

Indexed keywords

TRANSPORTATION;

ASSIGNMENT MODELS; CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS; CONGESTION; DYNAMIC ASSIGNMENT; MODELLING FRAMEWORK; RESIDUAL CAPACITY; TRANSIT NETWORKS; VEHICLE CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS;

TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

HUB AND SPOKE NETWORK; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRANSPORT VEHICLE;

CAMPANIA [ITALY]; ITALY; NAPLES; NAPOLI [CAMPANIA];

EID: 80054783989     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahuja R.K., Magnanti T.L., Orlin J.B. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications 1993, Prentice Hall, NJ.
2. Bell M.G.H. Capacity constrained transit assignment models and reliability. Advanced Modelling for Transit Operations and Service Planning 2003, 81-197. Pergamon, Oxford. W.H.K. Lam, M.G.H. Bell (Eds.).
3. Bell, M.G.H., Schmocker, J.-D., 2005. The build-up of capacity problems during the peak hour: a dynamic frequency-based model. In: Conference Proceedings on Schedule-based Dynamic Transit Modeling, SBDTM 2005, Ischia, Italy.
4. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Cantarella G.E., Cascetta E. Dynamic processes and equilibrium in transportation networks: towards a unifying theory. Transportation Science 1995, 29:305-329.
6. Cascetta E. Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Cepeda M., Cominetti R., Florian M. A frequency-based assignment model for congested transit networks with strict capacity constraints: characterization and computation of equilibria. Transportation Research Part B 2006, 42:437-459.
8. Cominetti R., Correa J. Common lines and passenger assignment in congested transit networks. Transportation Science 2001, 35:250-267.
9. Crisalli U. Dynamic transit assignment algorithms for urban congested networks. Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century 1999, 373-382. Computational Mechanics Publications. L.J. Sucharov (Ed.).
10. De Cea J., Fernàndez E. Transit assignment for congested public transport systems: an equilibrium model. Transportation Science 1993, 27:133-147.
11. Hamdouch Y., Lawphongpanich S. Schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and capacity constraints. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42:663-684.
12. Hamdouch Y., Marcotte P., Nguyen S. Capacitated transit assignment with loading priorities. Mathematical Programming 2004, 101B:205-230.
13. Hickman M.D., Wilson N.H.M. Passenger travel time and path choice implications of real-time transit information. Transportation Research Part C 1995, 3:211-226.
14. Kittelson and Associates, KFH Group Inc., Pearson Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglass Inc., Hunter-Zaworski, K. (2003). Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, second ed., TCRP Report 100, Transportation Research Board.
15. Kurauchi F., Bell M.G.H., Schmocker J.-D. Capacity constrained transit assignment with common lines. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms 2003, 2:309-332.
16. Lam W.H.K., Gao Z.Y., Chan K.S., Yang H. A stochastic user equilibrium assignment model for congested transit networks. Transportation Research Part B 1999, 33:351-368.
17. Morgan D., Koutsopoulos H., Ben-Akiva M. Simulation-based evaluation of advanced public transportation systems. Schedule-Based Dynamic Transit Modeling: Theory and Applications 2004, 95-112. Kluwer Academic Publisher. N.H.M. Wilson, A. Nuzzolo (Eds.).
18. Nguyen S., Pallottino S. Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks. European Journal of Operational Research 1988, 37:176-186.
19. Nielsen O.A. A large scale stochastic multi-class schedule-based transit model with random coefficients. Schedule-Based Dynamic Transit Modeling: Theory and Applications 2004, 53-78. Kluwer Academic Publisher. N.H.M. Wilson, A. Nuzzolo (Eds.).
20. Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F., 1994. An equilibrium assignment model for intercity transit networks. In: Proceedings of TRISTAN II Conference, Capri, Italy.
21. Nuzzolo, A., Crisalli, U., Rosati, L., 2007. Congested transit networks: a schedule-based dynamic assignment model with explicit vehicle capacity constrains. In: Proceedings of European Transportation Forum 2007, Leeuwenhorst, The Netherlands.
22. Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F., Crisalli, U., 1999. A doubly dynamic assignment model for congested urban transit networks. In: Proceedings of 27th European Transportation Forum, Seminar F, Cambridge, UK, pp. 169-184.
23. Nuzzolo A., Russo F., Crisalli U. A doubly dynamic schedule-based assignment model for transit networks. Transportation Science 2001, 35:268-285.
24. Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F., Crisalli, U., 2003. Transit Network Modelling. The Schedule-Based Dynamic Approach, Collana Trasporti, Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy.
25. Papola N., Filippi F., Gentile G., Meschini L. Schedule-based transit assignment: a new dynamic equilibrium model with vehicle capacity constraints. Schedule-Based Modeling of Transportation Networks: Theory and Applications 2009, 145-170. Springer, US. N.H.M. Wilson, A. Nuzzolo (Eds.).
26. Poon M.H., Wong S.C., Tong C.O. A dynamic schedule-based model for congested transit networks. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38:343-368.
27. Russo F., Velonà P. Day-to-day approach in the analysis of transit system: the case of two runs. Computers in Railways VIII 2002, 397-406. WIT Press, Southampton, UK. J. Allan, R.J. Hill, C.A. Brebbia, S. Sciutto (Eds.).
28. Russo, F., Velonà, P., 2002b. Day-to-day approach for path choice models in the transit system: analytical evaluations and simulation results. In: Proceedings of European Transportation Forum 2002, Cambridge, UK.
29. Schmocker J.-D., Bell M.G.H., Kurauchi F. A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42:925-945.
30. Shalaby A., Wahba M. MILATRAS. A new modelling framework for the transit assignment problem. Schedule-Based Modeling of Transportation Networks: Theory and Applications 2009, 171-194. Kluwer Academic Publisher. N.H.M. Wilson, A. Nuzzolo (Eds.).
31. Spiess H., Florian M. Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transportation Research Part B 1989, 23:83-102.
32. Sumalee A., Tana Z., Lam W.H.K. Dynamic stochastic transit assignment with explicit seat allocation model. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43:895-912.
33. Tong C.O., Richardson A.J. Estimation of time-dependent origin-destination matrices for transit networks. Journal of Advanced Transportation 1984, 18:145-161.
34. Tong C.O., Wong S.C. A minimum path algorithms for a schedule-based transit network with a general fare structure. Schedule-Based Dynamic Transit Modeling: Theory and Applications 2004, 241-262. Kluwer Academic Publishers. N.H.M. Wilson, A. Nuzzolo (Eds.).
35. Wong S.C., Tong C.O. A stochastic transit assignment model using a dynamic schedule-based network. Transportation Research Part B 1999, 33:107-121.