From genotype to phenotype in bovine functional genomics

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 165-171

  Pareek, Chandra S ^a   Smoczynski, Rafal ^a   Pierzchala, Mariusz ^b   Czarnik, Urszula ^c   Tretyn, Andrzej ^a  

^a NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND ANIMAL BREEDING   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Annotation; Bovine; Database; Functional genomics; Genome; QTL

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COW; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; ANIMAL; CATTLE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 80054783508     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elr019     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Nachtomy O, Shavit A, Yakhini Z. Gene expression and the concept of the phenotype. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 2007;38:238-54.
2. Dekkers JCM. Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. Anim Sci 2004;82:E313-28.
3. Georges M, Andersson L. Positional identification of structural and regulatory quantitative trait nucleotides in domestic animal species. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2003;68: 179-87.
4. Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, et al. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res 2001;12:222-31.
5. Olsen HG, Lien S, Gautier M, et al. Mapping of a milk production QTL to a 420 kb region on bovine chromosome 6 Genetics 2005;169:275-83.
6. Grobet L, Martin LJ, Poncelet D, et al. A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle. Nat Genet 1997;17:71-4.
7. Park YH, Joo YS, Park JY, et al. Characterization of lymphocyte subpopulations and major histocompatibility complex haplotypes of mastitis-resistant and susceptible cows. JVet Sci 2004;5:29-39.
8. Green RD, Qureshi MA, Long JA, et al. Identifying the future needs for long-term USDA efforts in agricultural animal genomics. IntJ Biol Sci 2007;3:185-91.
9. Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worley KC, et al. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science 2009;324:522-8.
10. Liu Y, Qin X, Henry Song X, et al. Bos taurus genome assembly. BMCGenomics 2009;10:180.
11. Gibbs R, Weinstock G, Rohrer G, et al. Bovine genomic sequencing initiative Cattle-izing the human genome. Bovine SequencingWhite Paper 2002: p. 1-12. http://www.genome.gov/pages/research/sequencing/seqproposals/bovineseq.pdf.
12. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 2005;437:376-80.
13. Morozova O, Marra MA. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics 2008;92:255-64.
14. Werner T. Next generation sequencing in functional genomics. Brief Bioinform 2010;11:499-511.
15. Wheeler DA, Srinivasan M, Egholm M, et al. The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature 2008;452:872-6.
16. Xi R, Kim TM, Park PJ. Detecting structural variations in the human genome using next generation sequencing. Brief Funct Genomics 2010;9:405-15.
17. Henn BM, Gravel S, Moreno-Estrada A, et al. Fine-scale population structure and the era of next-generation sequencing. HumMol Genet 2010;19:R221-6.
18. Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS, Koboldt DC, et al. Identification of disease-causing mutations in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) using next-generation DNA sequencing. InvestOphthalmolVis Sci 2011;52:494-503.
19. Bormann G, Chung CA, Boyd VL, etal. Whole methylome analysis by ultra-deep sequencing using two-base encoding. PLoS One 2010;5:e9320.
20. Fouse SD, Nagarajan RP, Costello JF. Genome-scale DNA methylation analysis. Epigenomics 2010;2:105-17.
21. Bhaijee F, Pepper DJ, Pitman KT, et al. New developments in the molecular pathogenesis of head and neck tumors: a review of tumor-specific fusion oncogenes in mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma and NUT midline carcinoma. AnnDiagn Pathol 2011;15:69-77.
22. Costa V, Angelini C, De Feis I, et al. Uncovering the complexity of transcriptomes with RNA-Seq. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010;2010:853916.
23. Buermans HP Ariyurek Y, van Ommen G, et al., New methods for next generation sequencing based microRNA expression profiling. BMCGenomics 2010;11:716.
24. Nagalakshmi U, Waern K, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a method for comprehensive transcriptome analysis. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2010;11:1-13.
25. Marguerat S, Bähler J. RNA-seq: from technology to biology. CellMol Life Sci 2010;67:569-79.
26. Li R, Fan W, Tian G, et al. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 2010;463: 311-7.
27. Robertson G, Hirst M, Bainbridge M, et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods 2007;4:651-7.
28. Euskirchen GM, Rozowsky JS, Wei CL, et al. Mapping of transcription factor binding regions in mammalian cells by ChIP: comparison of array- and sequencing-based technologies. GenomeRes 2007;17:898-909.
29. Popp C, Dean W, Feng S, et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 2010;463:1101-5.
30. Michelizzi VN, Dodson MV, Pan Z, et al. Water buffalo genome science comes of age. IntJ Biol Sci 2010;6:333-49.
31. Mardis ER. Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu RevGenomicsHum Genet 2008;9:387-402.
32. Mardis ER. New strategies and emerging technologies for massively parallel sequencing: applications in medical research. GenomeMed 2009;1:40.
33. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies- the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 2010;1:31-46.
34. Greenleaf WJ, Block SM. Single-molecule, motion-based DNA sequencing using RNA polymerase. Science 2006;313: 801.
35. Harris TD, Buzby PR, Babcock H, et al. Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome. Science 2008;320: 106-9.
36. Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 2009;323:133-8.
37. Rusk N. Cheap third-generation sequencing. Nat Methods 2009;6:244-5.
38. Tuggle CK, Dekkers JCM, Reecy JM. Integration of structural and functional genomics. Anim Genet 2006;37: 1-6.
39. Wimmers K, Murani E, Ponsuksili S. Functional genomics and genetical genomics approaches towards elucidating networks of genes affecting meat performance in pigs. Brief Functl Genomics 2010;9:251-8.
40. Hocquette JF, Lehnerta S, Barendse J, et al. Recent advances in cattle functional genomics and their application to beef quality. Animal 2007;1:159-73.
41. Horner DS, Pavesi G, Castrignano' T, et al. Bioinformatics approaches for genomics and post genomics applications of next-generation sequencing. Brief Bioinform 2010;1: 181-97.
42. Weller JI, Ron M. Invited review: quantitative trait nucleotide determination in the era of genomic selection. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:1082-90.
43. Reese JT, Childers CP, Sundaram JP, et al. Bovine Genome Database: supporting community annotation and analysis of the Bos taurus genome. BMCGenomics 2010;11:645.
44. Childers CP, Reese JT, Sundaram JP, et al. Bovine Genome Database: integrated tools for genome annotation and discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;l39:D830-4.
45. Pruit KD, Tatusova T, Klimke W, et al. NCBI Reference Sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D32-6.
46. Curwen V, Eyras E, Andrews DT, et al. The Ensembl automatic gene annotation system. GenomeRes 2004;14:942-50.
47. Georges M, Nielsen D, Mackinnon M, et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics 1995;139:907-20.
48. Rothschild MF, Hu Z, Jiang Z. Advances in QTL mapping in pigs. IntJ Biol Sci 2007;3:192-7.
49. Womack J.E. Advances in livestock genomics: opening the barn door. Genome Res 2005;12:1699-705.
50. Hu Z, Fritz ER, Reecy JM. AnimalQTLdb: a livestock QTL database tool set for positional QTL information mining and beyond. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D604-9.
51. Kwitek A, Davis S, Shimoyama M, et al. Virtual Comparative Map (VCMap). Proceedings of Plant & Animal Genomes XVIII Conference, January 9-13, 2010, Town & Country Convention Center, San Diego, CA.