Using social networking for online role-plays to develop students' argumentative strategies

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 165-181

  Beach, Richard ^a,b   Doerr Stevens, Candance ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054768311     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.45.2.c     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Eds.). (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Bagley, E. A. S., & Shaffer, D. W. (2009). When people get in the way: Promoting civic thinking through epistemic gameplay. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 1(1), 36-52.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4. Beach, R., Anson, C., Kastman-Breuch, L., & Swiss, T. (2009). Teaching writing using blogs, wikis, and other digital tools. Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
5. Beach, R., & Doerr-Stevens, C. (2009). Learning argument practices through online role-play: Towards a rhetoric of significance and transformation. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(6), 460-468.
6. Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55.
7. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132-149.
8. Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321. (Pubitemid 351456611)
9. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Doctorow, C. (2008). Little brother. New York: Tor Teen.
11. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
12. Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2007). Technology-enhanced learning environments to support students' argumentation. New York: Springer.
13. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language in learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
14. Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.
15. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1130-1161.
16. Handa, C. (2004). Visual rhetoric in a digital world: A critical sourcebook. Boston: Bedford St. Martin's.
17. Jeong, A. C. (2006). The effects of conversational language on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Instructional Science, 34(5), 367-397. (Pubitemid 44086385)
18. Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.
19. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Energizing learning: The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher, 38, 37-51.
20. Kamberelis, G. (2001). Producing heteroglossic classroom (micro)cultures through hybrid discourse practice. Linguistics and Education, 12(1), 85-125. (Pubitemid 33648232)
21. Kist, W. (2009). The socially networked classroom: Teaching in the new media age. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22. Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Nussbaum, E. M. (2005). The effect of goal instructions and need for cognition on interactive argumentation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 286-313. (Pubitemid 40757531)
24. Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument- counterargument integration in students' writing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92.
25. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., & Øhrstrøm, P. (Eds.). (2008). Persuasive technology: Mass interpersonal persuasion: An early view of a new phenomenon. Berlin: Springer.
26. Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutierrez, K. D. (Eds.). (2009). Learning and expanding with Activity Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Schneider, S., & Evans, M. (2008). Transforming e-learning into ee-learning: The centrality of sociocultural participation. Innovate, 5, (1). Retrieved May 26, 2011 from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view= article&id=511
28. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.
29. Suthers, D. D., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2008). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1103-1127. (Pubitemid 351483931)
30. Zhao, S., Grasmuck S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816-1836.