Using the interactive whiteboard to stimulate active learning in school science

Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 102-117

  Hennessy, Sara ^a   Deaney, Rosemary ^a   Tooley, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Bottisham Village College   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054739617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-715-2.ch007     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Armstrong, V., & Curran, S. (2006). Developing a collaborative mode of research using digital video. Computers & Education, 46(3), 336-347. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.015
2. Becta. (2008). Harnessing Technology: Next Generation Learning 2008-14. Coventry, UK: Becta.
3. Gillen, J., Kleine Staarman, J., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner, A. (2007). A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243-256. doi:10.1080/17439880701511099
4. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170. doi:10.1080/14759390500200199
5. Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2009a). 'Intermediate theory' building: Integrating multiple teacher and researcher perspectives through in-depth video analysis of pedagogic strategies. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1753-1795.
6. Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2009b). The impact of collaborative video analysis by practitioners and researchers upon pedagogical thinking and practice: A follow-up study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(5), 617-638.
7. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283-301. doi:10.1080/17439880701511131
8. Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H., et al. (2005). Embedding ICT in the Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Final Report. Newcastle, UK: Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
9. Ilomaki, L., Jaakkola, T., Lakkala, M., Nirhamo, L., Nurmi, S., Paavola, S., et al. (2003). Principles, models and examples of designing learning objects (LOs). Pedagogical guidelines in CELEBRATE. Working paper for the European Commission, CELEBRATE Project, IST-2001-35188. Retrieved 9 February 2009, from http://www.helsinki.fi/science/networkedlearning/texts/principlesforlos.pdf.
10. Ilomaki, L., Lakkala, M., & Paavola, S. (2006). Case studies of learning objects used in school settings. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(3), 249-267. doi:10.1080/17439880600893291
11. Jones, S., & Tanner, H. (2002). Teachers' interpretations of effective whole-class interactive teaching in secondary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies, 28(3), 265-274. doi:10.1080/0305569022000003717
12. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61-73(13).
13. Kitchen, S., Mackenzie, H., Butt, S., & Finch, S. (2006). Evaluation of Curriculum Online report of the third survey of schools. London: National Centre for Social Research.
14. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861-878. doi:10.1080/0141192032000137349
15. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levacic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., Castle, F., et al. (2007). The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance Evaluation: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge (No. RR816). London: DfES.
16. Powell, A., Francisco, J., & Maher, C. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners' mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405-435. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002
17. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457. doi:10.1080/01411920600635452
18. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x
19. Somekh, B., Haldane, M., Jones, K., Lewin, C., Steadman, S., & Scrimshaw, P. (2007). Evaluation of the Primary Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project (SWEEP): Report to the Department for Education and Skills. London: Becta.
20. Sorensen, P. D., Newton, L. R., & Harrison, C. (2006, September 2006). The professional development of teachers through interaction with digital video. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association (BERA), University of Warwick.