Case studies of learning objects used in school settings

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 249-267

  Ilomäki, Liisa ^a   Lakkala, Minna ^a   Paavola, Sami ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748657584     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439880600893291     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bereiter, C. (2002) Education and mind in the knowledge age (Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum).
2. Candela, A., Rockwell, E. & Coll, C. (2004) What in the world happens in classrooms? Qualitative classroom research, European Educational Research Journal, 3, 692-713.
3. Collis, B. & Strijker, A. (2001-2002) New pedagogies and re-usable learning objects: toward a new economy in education, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30, 137-157.
4. Crosier, J. K., Cobb, S. & Wilson J.R. (2002) Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science, Computers & Education, 38, 77-94.
5. Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception (Boston, Houghton Mifflin).
6. Gibson, S. & Oberg, S. (2004) Visions and realities of Internet use in schools: Canadian perspectives, British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 569-585.
7. Giles, D. (2002) Advanced research methods in psychology (London, Routledge).
8. Ilomäki, L., Jaakkola, T., Lakkala, M., et al. (2003) Principles, models and examples for designing learning objects (LOs). Pedagogical guidelines in CELEBRATE. Working paper for the European Commission, CELEBRATE Project, IST-2001-35188, delivered May 2003. Available online at: http://www.helsinki.fi/ science/networkedlearning/texts/principlesforlos.pdf (accessed 24 June 2006).
9. Kozma, R. (2003) The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding, Learning and Instruction, 13, 205-226.
10. Law, N., Lee, Y. & Chow, A. (2002) Practice characteristics that lead to 21st century learning outcomes, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 415-426.
11. Leinhardt, G. (1993) On teaching, in: R. Glaser (Ed.) Advances in instructional psychology (vol. IV) (Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum), 1-54.
12. Lewin, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., et al. (2004) The UK ImpaCT2 Project, Education, Communication & Information, 4, 336-340.
13. Lim, C. P. & Barnes, S. (2002) 'Those who can, teach'-the pivotal role of the teacher in the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) learning environment, Journal of Educational Media, 27, 19-40.
14. MacCann, A. (1999) Evaluating flexible learning materials, paper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA) Conference, 11-12 February, Melbourne, Victoria.
15. Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Lahav, O. & Oren, A. (2000) Web-based learning environments: current pedagogical and technological state, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 55-77.
16. Norman, D. A. (1988) The psychology of everyday things (New York, Basic Books).
17. Oliver, R. & Herrington, J. (2003) Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective, Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 11, 111-126.
18. Orrill, C. H. (2002) Learning objects to support inquiry-based, online learning, in: D. A. Wiley (Ed.) The instructional use of learning objects (Bloomington, IN, Association for Educational Communications & Technology), 131-148.
19. Paavola, S. & Hakkarainen, K. (2005) The knowledge creation metaphor-an emergent epistemological approach to learning, Science & Education, 14(6), 535-557.
20. Salomon, G. (2002) Technology and pedagogy: why don't we see the promised revolution?, Educational Technology, 42, 71-75.
21. Scardamalia, M. (2002) Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge, in: B. Smith (Ed.) Liberal education in a knowledge society (Chicago, Open Court), 67-98.
22. Schofield, J. W. (1995) Computers and classroom culture (New York, Cambridge University Press).
23. Smeets, E. (2005) Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education?, Computers & Education, 44, 343-355.
24. Squires, D. & Preece, J. (1999) Predicting quality in educational software: evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them, Interacting with Computers, 11(5), 467-483.
25. Stake, R. (2000) Case studies, in: N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn) (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications), 435-454.
26. Todd, Z., Nerlich, B. & McKeown, S. (2004) Introduction, in Z. Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown and D. Clarke (Eds) Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (New York: Psychology Press), 3-16.
27. Wiley, D. A. (2002) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy, in: D. A. Wiley (Ed.) The instructional use of learning objects (Bloomington, IN, Association for Educational Communications & Technology), 3-24.
28. Windschitl, M. (1998) The WWW and classroom research: what path should we take?, Educational Researcher, 27, 28-33.
29. Yin, R. (2003) Case study research: design and methods (3rd edn) (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications).