Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: A comparison of young and elderly participants

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 237-247

  Grandjean, Julien ^a   Collette, Fabienne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Aging; Motor inhibition; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL LOAD; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTIVE INHIBITION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 80054084834     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Amieva H., Phillips L.H., Della Sala S., Henry J.D. Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2004, 127(5):949-964.
2. Andrés P., Guerrini C., Phillips L., Perfect T.J. Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition. Developmental Neuropsychology 2008, 33(2):1-23.
3. Aslan A., Zellner M., Bäuml K.H.T. Working memory capacity predicts listwise directed forgetting in adults and children. Memory 2010, 18(4):442-450.
4. Bélanger S., Belleville S. Semantic inhibition impairment in mild cognitive impairement: A distinctive feature of upcoming cognitive decline?. Neuropsychology 2009, 23(5):592-606.
5. Bélanger S., Belleville S., Gauthier S. Inhibition impairments in Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and normal aging: Effect of congruency proportion in a Stroop task. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:581-590.
6. Belleville S., Rouleau N., Van der Linden M. Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Cognition 2006, 62:113-119.
7. Bjorklund D.F., Harnishfeger K.K. The evolution of inhibition mechanisms and their role in human cognition and behavior. Interference and inhibition in cognition 1995, 141-173. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. F.N. Dempster, C.J. Brainerd (Eds.).
8. Bugg J.M., DeLosh E.L., Davalos D.B., Davis H.P. Age differences in Stroop interference. Contributions of general slowing and task-specific deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition 2007, 14(2):155-167.
9. Castel A.D., Balota D.A., Hutchison K.A., Logan J.M., Yap M.J. Spatial attention and response control in healthy younger and older adults and individuals with Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for disproportionate selection impairments in the Simon task. Neuropsychology 2007, 21(2):170-182.
10. Castel A.D., Pratt J., Craik F.I.M. The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65(6):970-981.
11. Charlot V., Feyereisen P. Aging and the deletion function of inhibition. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition 2004, 11(1):12-24.
12. Charlot V., Feyereisen P. Episodic memory, inhibition deficit, and cognitive aging: An examination of the frontal hypothesis. L'Annee Psychologique 2005, 105(2):323-357.
13. Cohen J.D., Dunbar K., McClelland J.L. Automaticity, attention and the strength of processing: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 1990, 97:332-361.
14. Cohen J.D., Servan-Schreiber D., McClelland J.L. A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. The American Journal of Psychology 1992, 105(2):239-269.
15. Colflesh G.J.H., Conway A.R.A. Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14(4):699-703.
16. Collette F., Amieva H., Adam S., Hogge M., Van der Linden M., Fabrigoule C., et al. Comparison of inhibitory functioning in mild Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Cortex 2007, 43(7):866-874.
17. Collette F., Germain S., Hogge M., Van der Linden M. Inhibitory control of memory in normal ageing: Dissociation between impaired intentional and preserved unintentional processes. Memory 2009, 17(1):104-122.
18. Collette F., Schmidt C., Scherrer C., Adam S., Salmon E. Specificity of inhibitory deficits in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiology of Aging 2009, 30:875-889.
19. Conway A.R.A., Cowan N., Bunting M.F. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8(2):331-335.
20. Conway A.R.A., Engle R.W. Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123(4):354-373.
21. Conway M.A., Fthenaki A. Disruption of inhibitory control of memory following lesions to the frontal and temporal lobes. Cortex 2003, 39:667-686.
22. Craik F.I.M., Byrd M. Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. Aging and cognitive processes 1982, 191-211. Plenum, New York. F.I.M. Craik, S. Trehub (Eds.).
23. Craik F.I.M., Byrd M., Swanson J.M. Patterns of memory loss in three elderly samples. Psychology and Aging 1987, 2(1):79-86.
24. Dagenbach D., Carr T.H. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language 1994, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
25. De Fockert J.W., Rees G., Frith C.D., Lavie N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 2001, 291:1803-1806.
26. Deltour J.J. Echelle de vocabulaire de Mill Hill de J.C. Raven. Adaptation française et normes européennes du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices de Raven PM 38 [Mill Hill vocabulary scale of J.C. Raven. French adaptation and European norms] 1993, L'Application des Techniques Modernes, Braine-le-Château, Belgium.
27. Dempster F.N., Brainerd C.J. Interference and inhibition in cognition 1995, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
28. Dempster F.N., Corkill A.J. Individual differences in susceptibility to interference and general cognitive ability. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101(2-3):395-416.
29. Dempster F.N., Corkill A.J. Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review 1999, 11(1):1-88.
30. Dumas J.A., Hartman M. Adult age differences in the access and deletion functions of inhibition. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 2008, 15:330-357.
31. Eenshuistra R.M., Ridderinkhof K.R., van der Molen M.W. Age-related changes in antisaccade task performance. Inhibitory control or working-memory engagement?. Brain and Cognition 2004, 56:177-188.
32. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: Variation with modality, age, and time-on-task. Journal of Psychophysiology 2002, 16(3):167-175.
33. Friedman N.P., Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133(1):101-135.
34. Grégoire J., Van der Linden M. Effect of age on forward and backward digit spans. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition 1997, 4(2):140-149.
35. Harnishfeger K.K. The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. Interference and inhibition in cognition 1995, 175-204. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. F.N. Dempster, C.J. Brainerd (Eds.).
36. Harnishfeger K.K., Bjorklund D.F. The ontogeny of inhibition mechanisms: A renewed approach to cognitive development. Emerging themes in cognitive development: Vol. 1. Foundations 1993, 28-49. Springer-Verlag, New York. M.L. Howe, R. Pasnak (Eds.).
37. Hasher L., Lustig C., Zacks R. Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. Variation in working memory 2007, 227-249. Oxford University Press, New York. A.R.A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M.J. Kane, A. Miyake, J.N. Towse (Eds.).
38. Hasher L., Zacks R.T., May C.P. Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. Attention and performance XVII, Cognitive regulation of performance. Interaction of theory and application 1999, 653-675. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Gopher, A. Koriat (Eds.).
39. Hester R., Garavan H. Working memory and executive function: The influence of content and load on the control of attention. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33(2):221-233.
40. Hester R.L., Kinsella G.J., Ong B. Effect of age on forward and backward span tasks. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2004, 10:475-481.
41. Hogge M., Salmon E., Collette F. Interference and negative priming in normal aging and in mild Alzheimer's disease. Psychologica Belgica 2008, 48(1):1-23.
42. Houghton G., Tipper S.P. A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language 1994, 53-112. Academic Press, San Diego. D. Dagenbach, T.H. Carr (Eds.).
43. Juncos-Rabadán O., Pereiro A.X., Facal D. Cognitive interference and aging: Insights from a spatial stimulus-response consistency task. Acta Psychologica 2008, 127:237-246.
44. Kane M.J., Bleckley M.K., Conway A.R.A., Engle R.W. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130(2):169-183.
45. Kane M.J., Engle R.W. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132(1):47-70.
46. Kane M.J., Hasher L., Stoltzfus E.R., Zacks R.T., Connelly S.L. Inhibitory attentional mechanisms and aging. Psychology and Aging 1994, 9(1):103-112.
47. Kramer A.F., Humphrey D.G., Larish J.F., Logan G.D., Strayer D.L. Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging 1994, 9(4):491-512.
48. Kubo-Kawai N., Kawai N. Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: Ageing and the Simon effect in a Go/No-Go Simon task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63(3):452-464.
49. Lavie N., Hirst A., de Fockert J.W., Viding E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133(3):339-354.
50. Little D.M., Hartley A.A. Further evidence that negative priming in the Stropp color-word task is equivalent in older and younger adults. Psychology and aging 2000, 15(1):9-17.
51. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7(3):166-174.
52. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. Stroop-type interference. Congruency effects in color naming with typewritten responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(3):978-992.
53. Lustig C., Hasher L., Tonev S.T. Distraction as a determinant of processing speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13(4):619-625.
54. Lustig C., May C.P., Hasher L. Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130(2):199-207.
55. Manly T., Robertson I.H., Galloway M., Hawkins K. The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:661-670.
56. Mattis S. Dementia rating scale. Geriatric psychiatry X 1976, 77-121. Grune and Stratton, New York. R. Bellack, B. Keraso (Eds.).
57. May C.P., Hasher L. Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24(2):363-379.
58. Mitchell J.P., Macrae C.N., Gilchrist I.D. Working memory and the suppression of reflexive saccades. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(1):95-103.
59. Monsch A.U., Bondi M.W., Salmon D.P., Butters N., Thal L.J., Hansen L.A., et al. Clinical validity of the Mattis dementia rating scale in detecting dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology 1995, 52(9):899-904.
60. Mostofsky S.H., Schafer J.G.B., Abrams M.T., Goldberg M.C., Flower A.A., Boyce A., et al. FMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17:419-430.
61. Nassauer K.W., Halperin J.M. Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibition processes through the use of novel computerized conflict tasks. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2003, 9(1):25-30.
62. Nelles G., de Greiff A., Pscherer A., Esser J. Afe-related differences of saccade induced cortical activation. Neuroscience Letters 2009, 458:15-18.
63. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., Garavan H. Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17(1):56-71.
64. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., Ross T.J., Garavan H., Rao S.M., Stein E.A. Comparability of functional MRI response in young and old during inhibition. Neuroreport 2004, 15(1):129-133.
65. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a Go/No-Go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2003, 3(1):17-26.
66. Nigg J.T. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126(2):220-246.
67. Park D.C., Hedden T. Working memory and aging. Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging. Essays in honour of fergus craik 2001, 148-160. Psychology Press, New York. M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, H.L.I. Roediger (Eds.).
68. Peltsch A., Hemraj A., Garcia A., Munoz D.P. Age-related trends in saccade characteristics among the elderly. Neurobiology of Aging 2011, 32:669-679.
69. Redick T.S., Calvo A., Gay C.E., Engle R.W. Working memory capacity and Go/No-Go task performance. Selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2011, 37(2):308-324.
70. Rhodes M.G. Age-related differences in performance on the Winsconsin Card Sorting Test: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19(3):482-494.
71. Roberts R.J., Hager L.D., Heron C. Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123(4):374-393.
72. Roberts R.J., Pennington B.F. An interactive framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes. Developmental Neuropsychology 1996, 12(1):105-126.
73. Rosen V.M., Engle R.W. Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 39:418-436.
74. Rush B.K., Barch D.M., Braver T.S. Accounting for cognitive aging: context processing, inhibition or processing speed?. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition 2006, 13(3-4):588-610.
75. Salthouse T.A., Babcock R.L. Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology 1991, 27(5):763-776.
76. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide 2002, Psychology Software Tools Inc, Pittsburgh, PA.
77. Shuster J., Toplak M.E. Executive and motivational inhibition: Associations with self-report measures related to inhibition. Consciousness and Cognition 2009, 18(2):471-480.
78. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18(6):643-662.
79. Stuyven E., Van der Goten K., Vandierendonck A., Claeys K., Crevits L. The effect of cognitive load on saccadic eye movements. Acta Psychologica 2000, 104:69-85.
80. Unsworth N., Schrock J.C., Engle R.W. Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2004, 30(6):1302-1321.
81. Verhaegen P., De Meersman L. Aging and the negative priming effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and aging 1998, 13(3):435-444.
82. Verhaegen P., Steitz D.W., Sliwinski M.J., Cerella J. Aging and dual-task performance. A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging 2003, 18(3):443-460.
83. Welsh M.C., Satterlee-Cartmell T., Stine M. Towers of Hanoi and London: Contribution of working memory and inhibition to performance. Brain and Cognition 1999, 41:231-242.
84. Witthöft M., Sander N., Süb H.M., Wittmann W.W. Adult age differences in inhibitory processes and their predictive validity for fluid intelligence. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition 2009, 16(2):133-163.
85. Zimmerman P., Fimm B. Tests d'évaluation de l'attention (TEA) 1994, Psytest, Würselen, Deutschland.