Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibition processes through the use of novel computerized conflict tasks

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 25-30

  Nassauer, Katharine W ^a   Halperin, Jeffrey M ^a,b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict; Inhibitory control; Motor inhibition; Perceptual inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUTOMATION; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; SAMPLE; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037249960     PISSN: 13556177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355617703910034     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Awh, E. & Gehring, W.J. (1999). The anterior cingulate cortex lends a hand in response selection. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 853-854.
2. Bahri, T. & Bendania, A. (1997). Effect of language dominance on cognitive processes in a Stroop task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 979-988.
3. Baldo, J.V., Shimamura, A.P., & Prinzmetal, W. (1998). Mapping symbols to response modalities: Interference effects on Stroop-like tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 427-437.
4. Barkley, R.A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition and self control. In ADHD and the nature of self-control (pp. 65-82). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Doehrman, S., Landau, R., & O'Connell, D. (1978). The Stroop phenomenon: Perceptual conflict or response competition? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 1127-1131.
6. Dyer, F.N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual cognitive and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106-120.
7. Glaser, W.R. & Dolt, M.O. (1977). A functional model to localize the conflict underlying the Stroop phenomenon. Psychological Research, 39, 287-310.
8. Glaser, M.O. & Glaser, W.R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894.
9. Golden, J.C. (1978). Stroop Color and Word Test. Chicago, III: Stoelting.
10. Heilman, K.M., Watson, R.T., & Valenstein, E. (1993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (3rd ed., pp. 279-336). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Morton, J. (1969). Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 329-346.
12. O'Leary, M.J. & Barber, P.J. (1993). Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 830-844.
13. Palef, S.R. & Olson, D.R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry and a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 201-209.
14. Pardo, J.V., Pardo, P.J., Janer, K.W., & Raichle, M.E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 87, 256-259.
15. Peterson, B.S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J.C., Zhang, H., Anderson, A.W., & Gore, J.C. (1999). An fMRI study of Stroop Word-Color interference: Evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems. Society of Biological Psychiatry, 45, 1237-1258.
16. Ridderinkhof, K.R. & van der Molen, M.W. (1995). When global information and local information collide: A brain potential analysis of the locus of interferenc effects. Biological Psychology, 41, 29-53.
17. Sergeant, J. (1996). A theory of attention: An information processing perspective. In G.R. Lyon & N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 57-69). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
18. Sternberg, S. (1969). Discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: Holland.
19. Stirling, N. (1979). Stroop interference: An input and an output phenomenon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 121-132.
20. Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
21. Virzi, R.A. & Egeth, H.E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory and Cognition, 13, 304-319.
22. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.
23. Zhang, H., Zhang, J. & Kornblum, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.