Aging and the deletion function of inhibition

Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 12-24

  Charlot, Valentine ^a,b   Feyereisen, Pierre ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b Department of Psychology ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL TASK; PERCEPTION; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 2342649479     PISSN: 13825585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/anec.11.1.12.29363     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Burke, D.M. (1997). Language, aging and inhibitory deficits: Evaluation of a theory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P254-P264.
2. Burke, D.M., & MacKay, D.G. (1997). Memory, language and ageing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 352, 1845-1856.
3. Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17, 85-100.
4. Coblentz, J.M., Mattis, S., Zingesser, L.H., Kasoff, S.S., Wisniewsky, H.M., & Katzman, R. (1973). Presenile dementia. Clinical aspects and evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Archives of Neurology, 29, 299-308.
5. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1989). Age differences in source forgetting: Effects on reality monitoring and on eyewitness testimony. Psychology and Aging, 4, 10-17.
6. Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). BRULEX. Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. [BRULEX: A computerized lexical data for the French language]. Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
7. Craik, F.I.M., & Jennings, J.M. (1992). Human memory. In F.I.M. Craik & T.A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 51-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Dagenbach, D., & Carr, T. (1994). Inhibitory processes in perceptual recognition: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 327-358). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Deltour, J.J. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire de Mill de J.C. Raven. Adaptation française et normes européennes du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices de Raven (PM 38) [Mill-Hill vocabulary scale of J.C. Raven. French adaptation and European norms]. Braine-le-Château, Belgium: Editions L'application des techniques modernes.
10. Dempster, F.N., & Brainerd, C.J. (1995). Interference and inhibition in cognition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Hartman, M. (1995). Aging and interference: Evidence from indirect memory tests. Psychology and Aging, 10, 659-669.
12. Hartman, M., & Dusek, J. (1994). Direct and indirect memory tests: What they reveal about age differences in interference. Aging and Cognition, 1, 292-309.
13. Hartman, M., & Hasher, L. (1991). Aging and suppression: Memory for previously relevant information. Psychology and Aging, 6, 587-594.
14. Hasher, L., Quig, M.B., & May, C.P. (1997). Inhibitory control over no-longer-relevant information. Psychology and Aging, 6, 587-594.
15. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M.K., & Chrosniak, L.D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106-112.
17. Isingrini, M., Vazou, F., & Leroy, P. (1995). Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: Effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 23, 462-467.
18. Johnson, M.K., & Hasher, L. (1987). Human learning and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 631-668.
19. Levy, B.J., & Anderson, M.C. (2002). Inhibitory processes and the control of memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 299-305.
20. Light, L.L., & LaVoie, D. (1993). Direct and indirect measures of memory in old age. In P. Graf & M.E.J. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 207-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Light, L.L., LaVoie, D., Valencia-Laver, D., Albertson Owens, S.A., & Mead, G. (1992). Direct and indirect measures of memory for modality in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1284-1297.
22. Light, L.L., Prull, M.W., & Kennison, R.F. (2000). Divided attention, aging, and priming in exemplar generation and category verification. Memory and Cognition, 28, 856-872.
23. Light, L.L., Prull, M.W., LaVoie, D.J., & Healy, M.R. (2000). Dual process theories of memory in old age. In T.J. Perfect & E.A. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 238-300). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Lustig, C., & Hasher, L. (2001). Implicit memory is not immune to interference. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 618-628.
25. May, C.P., & Hasher, L. (1998). Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 363-379.
26. May, C.P., Zacks, R.T., Hasher, L., & Multhaup, K.S. (1999). Inhibition in the processing of garden-path sentences. Psychology and Aging, 14, 304-313.
27. Nielson, K.A., Langenecker, S.A., & Garavan, H. (2002). Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 56-71.
28. Parkin, A.J. (1999). Component processes versus systems: Is there really an important difference? In J.K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: systems, process or function? (pp. 273-287). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Perruchet, P., & Baveux, P. (1989). Correlational analyses of explicit and implicit memory performance. Memory and Cognition, 17, 77-86.
30. Persad, C.C., Abeles, N., Zacks, R.T., & Denburd, N.L. (2002). Inhibitory changes after 60 and their relationship to measures of attention and memory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P223-P232.
31. Rabinowitz, J.C. (1989). Judgments of origin and generation effects: Comparisons between young and elderly adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 259-268.
32. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Verwoed, M. (1989). A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 378-387.
33. Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Marshuetz, C., Jonides, J., Smith, E.E., Hartley, A., & Koeppe, R. (2001). Neurocognitive ageing of storage and executive processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 257-278.
34. Spencer, W.D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A metaanalysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
35. Stoltzfus, E.R., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1996). Working memory and aging: Current status of the inhibitory view. In J.T.E. Richardson (Ed.), Working memory and human cognition (pp. 66-88). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37, 179-189.
37. Zacks, R.T., & Hasher, L. (1994). Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. In D. Dagenbach & T.H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 241-264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38. Zacks, R.T., & Hasher, L. (1997). Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: A reply to Burke and McDowd. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P274-P283.
39. Zacks, R.T., Radvansky, G.A., & Hasher, L. (1996). Studies of directed forgetting in older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 143-156.