Investigating intelligibility for uncertain context-aware applications

UbiComp'11 - Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 415-424

  Lim, Brian Y ^a   Dey, Anind K ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

context awareness; explanations; intelligibility; user study

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT AWARE APPLICATIONS; CONTEXT-AWARENESS; EXPLANATIONS; LOCATION-AWARE; USER STUDY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

EID: 80054081327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2030112.2030168     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Antifakos, S. et al. (2004). Evaluating the Effects of Displaying Uncertainty in Context-Aware Applications. Ubicomp 04, 54-69.
2. Antifakos, S. et al. (2005). Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence. MobileHCI 05, 9-14.
3. Bellotti, V. & Edwards, W.K. (2001). Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2-4): 193-212. (Pubitemid 34216585)
4. Chalmers, M. & MacColl, I. (2003). Seamful and seamless design in ubiquitous computing. In Workshop: At the Crossroads: The Interaction of HCI and Systems Issues, Ubicomp 03.
5. Cheverst, K. et al. (2005). Exploring issues of user model transparency and proactive behavior in an office environment control system. UMUAI 05, 15(3-4), 235-273.
6. Dearman, D. et al. (2007). An exploration of location error estimation. Ubicomp 07, 181-198.
7. Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D. & Salber, D. (2001). A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. HCI Journal, 16(2-4): 97-166. (Pubitemid 34216582)
8. Dey, A. et al. (2002). Distributed mediation of ambiguous context in aware environments. UIST 02, 121-130.
9. Dzindolet, M. et al. (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6):697-718.
10. Greenberg, S. (2001). Context as a dynamic construct. HCI 16(2), 257-268.
11. Kittur, A. et al. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. CHI 08, 453-456.
12. Kulesza, T. et al. (2009). Fixing the Program My Computer Learned: Barriers for End-users, Challenges for the Machine. IUI 09, 187-196.
13. Lemelson, H., et al. (2008). A Study on User Acceptance of Error Visualization Techniques. HUCUBIS 08.
14. Lim, B.Y. et al. (2009). Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. CHI 09, 2119-2128.
15. Lim, B.Y., Dey, A.K. (2009). Assessing Demand for Intelligibility in Context-Aware Applications. Ubicomp 09, 195-204.
16. Lim, B.Y., Dey, A.K. (2011). Design of an Intelligible Mobile Context-Aware Application. To appear in MobileHCI 11.
17. Lu, H. et al. (2009). SoundSense: scalable sound sensing for people-centric applications on mobile phones. MobiSys 09, 165-178.
18. Muir, B. (1994). Trust in automation: Part i. theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11): 1905-1922.
19. Rukzio, E. et al. (2006). Visualization of uncertainty in context aware mobile applications. MobileHCI 06, 247-250. (Pubitemid 47140819)
20. Tullio, J. et al. (2007). How it works: A field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system. CHI 07, 31-40. (Pubitemid 47581582)
21. Weiser, M. & Brown, J.S. (1997). The coming age of calm technology. Beyond Calculation: the Next Fifty Years, 75-85.
22. Yan, Z. et al. (2010). Effects of displaying trust information on mobile application usage. ATC 10, 107-121.