Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 111, Issue , 2005, Pages 9-14

  Antifakos, Stavros ^a   Kern, Nicky ^b   Schiele, Bernt ^b   Schwaninger, Adrian ^c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Context Aware systems; System confidence; Trust; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

USER INTERFACES;

CONFIDENCE INFORMATION; CONTEXT-AWARE; CONTEXT-AWARE SYSTEMS; SENSOR INPUTS; SYSTEM CONFIDENCE; SYSTEM RELIABILITY; TRUST; UNCERTAINTY;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 77953745112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1085777.1085780     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. S. Banbury, S. Seldcon, M. Endsley, T. Gordon, and K. Tatlock. Being certain about uncertainty: How the representation of system reliability affects pilot decision making. In Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 1998.
2. V. Bellotti and K. Edwards. Intelligibility and accountability: Human considerations in context-aware systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2):193-212, 2001.
3. C. Bubb-Lewis and M. Scerbo. Getting to know you: Human-computer communicationin adaptive automation. In M. Mouloua and J. Koonce, editors, Human-Automation Interaction: Research and Practice. Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
4. M. Chalmers and I. MacColl. Seamful and seamless design in ubiquitous computing. In Workshop: At the Crossroads: The Interaction of HCI and Systems Issues in Ubicomp, 2003.
5. P. de Vries, C. Midden, and D. Bouwhuis. The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6):719-736, 2003.
6. M. Dzindolet, S. Peterson, R. Plmranky, L. Pierce, and H. Beck. The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6):697-718, 2003.
7. M. Eidelkind and S. Papantonopoulos. Operator trust and task delegation: Strategies in semi-autonomous agent systems. In M. Mouloua and J. Koonce, editors, Human-Automation Interaction: Research and Practice. Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
8. J. Fogarty, S. E. Hudson, and J. Lai. Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptability. In Proc. ACM CHI, pages 207-214, 2004.
9. K. Gempler and C. Wickens. Display of predictor reliability on a cockpit display of traffic information. Technical Report ARL-98-6/Rockwell-98-l, Aviation Research Lab, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois, 1998.
10. S. Greenberg. Context as a dynamic construct. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2):257-268, 2001.
11. E. Horvitz. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proc. CHI, pages 159-166, 1999.
12. E. Horvitz and M. Barry. Display of information for time-critical decision making. In Proc. 11th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 296-305. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
13. N. Kern, S. Antifakos, B. Schiele, and A. Schwaninger. A model of human interruptability: Experimental evaluation and automatic estimation from wearable sensors. In Proc. ISWC, pages 158-165, Washington DC, USA, Nov 2004.
14. N. Kern and B. Schiele. Context-aware notfication for wearable computing. In Proc. ISWC, pages 223-230, White Plains, NY, USA, October 2003.
15. P. Maes. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM, 37:30-40, 1994.
16. J. Mankoff, S. Hudson, and G. Abowd. Interaction techniques for ambiguity resolution in recognition-based interfaces. In Proc. UIST, 2000.
17. B. Muir. Trust in automation: Part i. theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11):1905-1922, 1994.
18. A. Newberger and A. Dey. System support for context monitoring and control. In Workshop: At the Crossroads: The Interaction of HCI and Systems Issues in Ubicomp, 2003.
19. D. Nicholls, V. Barsotti, P. Battino, P. Marti, and S. Pozzi. Presenting uncertainty to pilots and controllers. In 5th Intern. Seminar on ATM, FAA, and EuroControl, 2003.
20. E. Oztop, D. Wolpert, and M. Kawato. Mental state inference using visual control parameters. Cognitive Brain Research, (22):129-151, 2005.
21. R. Parasuraman. Human use and abuse of automation. In M. Mouloua and J. Koonce, editors, Human-Automation Interaction: Research and Practice. Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
22. D. Patterson, L. Liao, D. Fox, and H. Kautz. Inferring high-level behaviour from low-level sensors. In Proc. UbiComp, 2003.
23. I. Poupyrev, S. Maruyama, and J. Rekimoto. Ambient touch: Designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices. In Proc. UIST, 2002.
24. N. Sawhney and C. Schmandt. Nomadic radio: speech and audio interaction for contextual messaging in nomadic environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(3): 353-383, 2000.
25. T. Sheridan. Computer control and human alienation. In Technology Review, pages 61-73, 1980.
26. S. Tiernan, E. Cutrell, and M. Czerwinski. Effective notification systems depend on user trust. In Proc. Human-Computer Interaction - Interact, pages 684-685, 2001.
27. J. Williamson and R. Murray-Smith. Sonification of probabilistic feedback through granular synthesis. IEEE Multimedia, 12(2):45-52, April/June 2005.
28. C. Wisneski. The design of personal ambient displays. Master's thesis, MIT, 1999. Thesis Proposal M.Sc.