Design of an intelligible mobile context-aware application

Mobile HCI 2011 - 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 157-166

  Lim, Brian Y ^a   Dey, Anind K ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

context awareness; explanations; intelligibility; user study

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS BEHAVIORS; CONTEXT AWARE APPLICATIONS; CONTEXT-AWARENESS; DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS; DESIGN STRATEGIES; EXPLANATIONS; MOBILE CONTEXT; QUESTION TYPE; USER STUDY;

AVAILABILITY; DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MOBILE DEVICES; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 80054836146     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2037373.2037399     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bellotti, V. & Edwards, W.K. (2001). Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2-4): 193-212. (Pubitemid 34216585)
2. Cheverst, K. et al. (2005). Exploring issues of user model transparency and proactive behavior in an office environment control system. UMUAI 05, 15(3-4), 235-273.
3. Damer, T.E. (2009). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments (6th. ed.). Belmont, CA. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
4. Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D. & Salber, D. (2001). A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. HCI Journal, 16(2-4): 97-166. (Pubitemid 34216582)
5. Dey, A.K. & Newberger, A. (2009). Support for context-aware intelligibility and control. CHI 09, 859-868.
6. Kim, T. & Hinds, P.J. (2006). Who should I blame? Effects of autonomy and transparency on attributions in HRI. ROMAN 06, 80-85.
7. Kulesza, T. et al. (2009). Fixing the Program My Computer Learned: Barriers for End-users, Challenges for the Machine. IUI 09, 187-196.
8. Lester, J. et al. (2009). A Practical Approach to Recognizing Physical Activities. Pervasive '06, 1-16. (Pubitemid 44044748)
9. Lim, B.Y. et al. (2009). Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. CHI 09, 2119-2128.
10. Lim, B.Y., & Dey, A.K. (2009). Assessing Demand for Intelligibility in Context-Aware Applications. Ubicomp 09, 195-204.
11. Lim, B.Y., & Dey, A.K. (2010). Toolkit to Support Intelligibility in Context-Aware Applications. Ubicomp 10, 13-22.
12. Lu, H. et al. (2009). SoundSense: scalable sound sensing for people-centric applications on mobile phones. MobiSys '09, 165-178.
13. Miluzzo, E. et al. (2008). Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the CenceMe application. SenSys 08, 337-350.
14. Muir, B. (1994). Trust in automation: Part i. theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11): 1905-1922.
15. Oulasvirta, A. (2005). Grounding the Innovation of Future Technologies. Human Technology 1 (1):58-75.
16. Tullio, J. et al. (2007). How it works: A field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system. CHI 07, 31-40. (Pubitemid 47581582)
17. Vermeulen, J. et al. (2010). PervasiveCrystal: Asking and Answering Why and Why Not Questions about Pervasive Computing Applications. IE 10, 271-276.
18. Ware, C. (2000). Information Visualization: Perception for design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Weiser, M. & Brown, J.S. (1997). The coming age of calm technology. Beyond Calculation: the Next Fifty Years, 75-85.