A study of a social annotation modeling learning system

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 117-137

  Samuel, Roy David ^a   Kim, ChanMin ^b   Johnson, Tristan E ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054056660     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.45.1.f     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Archibald, T., Johnson, T. E., Tenenbaum, G., Lebow, D., & Smith, S. (2008, June). The effect of the social annotation modeling-learning system on students' reading comprehension, critical thinking, and metacognitive skills: A study spanning two semesters. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology's Annual Summer Research Symposia, Bloomington, Indiana.
2. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5., pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
3. Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 805-814.
4. Berge, Z. L., Collins, M., & Dougherty, K. (2000). Design guidelines for web-based courses. In B. Abbey (Ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education (pp. 32-40). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
5. Bonanno, P., & Kommers, P. A. M. (2008). Exploring the influence of gender and gaming competence on attitudes towards using instructional games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 97-109.
6. Chu, P. C., & Spires, E. E. (1991). Validating the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale: Effects of cognitive style and computer courses on computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 7-21.
7. Collins, A., Joseph, D.,& Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15-42. (Pubitemid 38202849)
8. Concannon, F., Flynn, A., & Campbell, M. (2005). What campus based students think about the quality and benefits of eLearning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 501-512. (Pubitemid 43906799)
9. Corlett, J. (1996). Sophistry, Socrates, and sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 10, 84-94. (Pubitemid 126175182)
10. European Commission (EC). (2001). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament: The e-Learning action plan. Brussels, 28.3.
11. Glover, I., Xu, Z., & Hardaker, G. (2007). Online annotation-Research and practices. Computers & Education, 49, 1308-1320.
12. Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Faceto- face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction, 18, 187-200.
13. Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. (1992). An examination of the factor structures and concurrent validities for the Computer Attitude Scale, the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 735-745.
14. Heinssen, R. K, Jr., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49-59.
15. Johnson, T. E., Lee, Y., Lee, M., O'Connor, D. L., Khalil, M. K., & Huang, X. (2007). Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: Design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Human Resource Development International, 10, 437-454.
16. Keller, J. M., & Subhiyah, R. (1993). Course interest survey. Tallahassee, FL: Instructional Systems Program, Florida State University.
17. Khorrami-Arani, O. (2001). Researching computer self-efficacy. International Education Journal, 2, 17-25. (Pubitemid 33812062)
18. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179-211.
19. Lebow, D. G., Lick, D. W., & Hartman, H. J. (Fall 2003/2004). HyLighter and interactive annotation: New technology to develop higher-order thinking skills. In T. R. Owen (Ed.), Critical thinking and higher education [Special Issue]. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 23(1-2), 69-79.
20. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C., & Secules, T. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47, 43-62.
21. Murphy, C. A., Coover, D., & Owen, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893-899.
22. Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 178-197. (Pubitemid 43723741)
23. Rivera, J., McAlister, K., & Rice, M. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes & satisfaction between traditional & web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5, 151-179.
24. Saade, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 177-191.
25. Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8, 205-219. (Pubitemid 41657927)
26. Sandoval, W. A. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39, 213-223. (Pubitemid 40030826)
27. Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education 49, 396-413. (Pubitemid 46777140)
28. Spector, J. M., & Merrill, M. D. (2008). Editorial. Distance Education, 29, 123-126.
29. The E-Learning Concept. (2011). Retrieved April 18, 2011 from The E-Learning DomaIn http://www.learningdomain.com/ELearning/Introduction/What. html.
30. Torkzadeh, G., & Koufteros, X. (1994). Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 813-921.
31. Van der Pol, J., Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education, 15, 1804-1817.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.