Manifold reaching paradigm: How do we handle target redundancy?

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 2086-2102

  Berret, Bastien ^a   Chiovetto, Enrico ^a,d   Nori, Francesco ^a   Pozzo, Thierry ^a,b,c  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arm movement; Bar reaching; Decision making; Optimal control; Stochastic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MANIFOLD REACHING PARADIGM; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CONTROL; PATH ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; FINGERS; GOALS; HAND; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054010597     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01063.2010     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andersen RA, Cui H. Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits. Neuron 63: 568-583, 2009.
2. Anderson BDO, Moore JB. Linear Optimal Control. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1971.
3. Athans M. The role and use of the stochastic linear-quadratic-gaussian problem in control system design. IEEE Transactions Automatic Control 16: 529-552, 1971.
4. Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM. Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5: 2318-2330, 1985.
5. Ben-Itzhak S, Karniel A. Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements. Neural Comput 20: 779-812, 2008.
6. Benson DA, Huntington GT, Thorvaldsen TP, Rao AV. Direct trajectory optimization and costate estimation via an orthogonal collocation method. J Guidance Control Dynamics 29: 1435-1440, 2006.
7. Bernard C. Leçons sur les Phénomènes de la Vie Communs Aux Animaux et Aux Végétaux, edited by Dastre, A. Paris: J.-B. Baillière et Fils, vol. 1-2, 1878.
8. Berret B, Darlot C, Jean F, Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C, Gauthier JP. The inactivation principle: mathematical solutions minimizing the absolute work and biological implications for the planning of arm movements. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000194, 2008.
9. Biess A, Liebermann DG, Flash T. A computational model for redundant human threedimensional pointing movements: integration of independent spatial and temporal motor plans simplifies movement dynamics. J Neurosci 27: 13045-13064, 2007.
10. Bisley JW, Goldberg ME. Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 1-21, 2010.
11. Bizzi E, Hogan N, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Gistzer S. Does the nervous system use equilibrium point control to guide single and multiple joint movements? Behav Brain Sci 15: 603-613, 1992.
12. Bullock D, Grossberg S. Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95: 49-90, 1988.
13. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414: 446-449, 2001.
14. Calton JL, Dickinson AR, Snyder LH. Non-spatial, motor-specific activation in posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 5: 580-588, 2002.
15. Cannon WB. The Wisdom of the Body. New York: Norton, 1932.
16. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Simultaneous encoding of multiple potential reach directions in dorsal premotor cortex. J Neurophysiol 87: 1149-1154, 2002.
17. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 45: 801-814, 2005.
18. Cui H, Andersen RA. Posterior parietal cortex encodes autonomously selected motor plans. Neuron 56: 552-559, 2007.
19. Desmurget M, Pélisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C. From eye to hand: planning goaldirected movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22: 761-788, 1998.
20. Diedrichsen J, White O, Newman D, Lally N. Use-dependent and errorbased learning of motor behaviors. J Neurosci 30: 5159-5166, 2010.
21. Dorris MC, Glimcher PW. Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative subjective desirability of action. Neuron 44: 365-378, 2004.
22. Doya K. Modulators of decision making. Nat Neurosci 11: 410-416, 2008.
23. Engelbrecht S. Minimum principles in motor control. J Math Psychol 45: 497-542, 2001.
24. Erlhagen W, Schöner G. Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychol Rev 109: 545-572, 2002.
25. Faisal AA, Selen LPJ, Wolpert DM. Noise in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 292-303, 2008.
26. Feldman AG. Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenace of a steady posture, ii: Controllable parameters of the muscles. Biophysics 11: 565-578, 1966.
27. Flash T, Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5: 1688-1703, 1985.
28. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 127-138, 2010.
29. Friston KJ, Daunizeau J, Kilner J, Kiebel SJ. Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation. Biol Cybern 102: 227-260, 2010.
30. Garg D, Patterson MA, Hager WW, Rao AV, Benson DA, Huntington GT. A unified framework for the numerical solution of optimal control problems using pseudospectral methods. Automatica 46: 1843-1851, 2010.
31. Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA. Snopt: an sqp algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM Review 47: 99-131, 2005.
32. Goble JA, Zhang Y, Shimansky Y, Sharma S, Dounskaia NV. Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior. J Neurophysiol 98: 1240-1252, 2007.
33. Guerra M, Sarychev A. Measuring singularity of generalized minimizers for control-affine problems. J Dynamical Control Sys 15: 177-221, 2009.
34. Guigon E, Baraduc P, Desmurget M. Computational motor control: redundancy and invariance. J Neurophysiol 97: 331-347, 2007.
35. Guigon E, Baraduc P, Desmurget M. Optimality, stochasticity, and variability in motor behavior. J Comput Neurosci 24: 57-68, 2008.
36. Haggard P. Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 934-946, 2008.
37. Harris CM, Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
38. Kappen HJ. A linear theory for control of non-linear stochastic systems. Phys Rev Lett 95: 200-201, 2005.
39. Knill DC, Bondada A, Chhabra M. Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements. J Neurosci 31: 1219-1237, 2011.
40. Körding K. Decision theory: what "should" the nervous system do? Science 318: 606-610, 2007.
41. Martin V, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Redundancy, self-motion, and motor control. Neural Comput 21: 1371-1414, 2009.
42. Mazzoni P, Hristova A, Krakauer JW. Why don't we move faster? Parkinson's disease, movement vigor, and implicit motivation. J Neurosci 27: 7105-7116, 2007.
43. Morasso P. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42: 223-227, 1981.
44. Murray RM, Sastry SS, Zexiang L. A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation (1st ed). Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1994.
45. Packard MG, McGaugh JL. Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65: 65-72, 1996.
46. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, McIntyre J. Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity. Neuroscience 135: 371-383, 2005.
47. Pham QC, Hicheur H. On the open-loop and feedback processes that underlie the formation of trajectories during visual and nonvisual locomotion in humans. J Neurophysiol 102: 2800-2815, 2009.
48. Rao AV, Benson DA, Darby CL, Patterson MA, Francolin C, Sanders I, Huntington GT. Algorithm 902: Gpops, a matlab software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using the gauss pseudospectral method. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 37: 1-39, 2010.
49. Rich EL, Shapiro M. Rat prefrontal cortical neurons selectively code strategy switches. J Neurosci 29: 7208-7219, 2009.
50. Richardson MJE, Flash T. Comparing smooth arm movements with the two-thirds power law and the related segmented-control hypothesis. J Neurosci 22: 8201-8211, 2002.
51. Scholz JP, Schöner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126: 289-306, 1999.
52. Scholz JP, Schöner G, Latash ML. Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res 135: 382-404, 2000.
53. Scott SH. Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 532-546, 2004.
54. Soechting JF, Buneo CA, Herrmann U, Flanders M. Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does donders' law apply to arm movement? J Neurosci 15: 6271-6280, 1995.
55. Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F. Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J. Neurosci 1: 710-720, 1981.
56. Sternad D, Park SW, Müller H, Hogan N. Coordinate dependence of variability analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000751, 2010.
57. Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT. Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex. Science 304: 1782-1787, 2004.
58. Todorov E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7: 907-915, 2004.
59. Todorov E. Efficient computation of optimal actions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 11478-11483, 2009.
60. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. J Neurophysiol 80: 696-714, 1998.
61. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
62. Todorov E, Li W. A generalized iterative lqg method for locally-optimal feedback control of constrained nonlinear stochastic systems. In: American Control Conference, 2005. Proceedings of the 2005, vol. 1, 2005, p. 300-306.
63. Trommershäuser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS. Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory. Trends Cogn Sci 12: 291-297, 2008.
64. van Beers RJ, Haggard P, Wolpert DM. The role of execution noise in movement variability. J Neurophysiol 91: 1050-1063, 2004.
65. Van der Helm FCT, Rozendaal LA. Musculoskeletal systems with intrinsic and proprioceptive feedback. In: Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement, edited by Winters JM. New York: Springer, 2000, p. 164-174.
66. Vetter P, Flash T, Wolpert DM. Planning movements in a simple redundant task. Curr Biol 12: 488-491, 2002.
67. Winter D. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.