Willingness to pay for natural juice: A choice experiment approach;Dispositión a pagar por zumos naturales: Aplicación de un experimento de elección

ITEA Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-32

  Gracia, A ^a   Lopez B ^a   Virtue S ^b  

^a Unidad de Sanidad Vegetal   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aragon; Consumers; Fresh fruit; Market research; Preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053954184     PISSN: 16996887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barreiro-Hurlé J, Colombo S, Cantos-Villar E, 2008a. Is there a market for functional wines? Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for resveratrol-enriched red wine. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 360-371.
2. Barreiro-Hurle J, Gracia A, De Magistris T, 2008b. Using latent classes to determine consumer heterogeneity in nutritional label valuation. Food Economics - Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section C, 5 (3), 178-193.
3. Barreiro-Hurle J, Gracia A, De Magistris T, 2010. The Effects of Multiple Health and Nutrition Labels on Consumer Food Choices. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61 (2), 426-443.
4. Blend JR, Van Ravenswaay EO, 1999. Consumer Demand for Eco-labeled Apples: Results from Econometric Estimation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 1072-1077.
5. Bocaleti S., Nardella M., 2000. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3, 297-310.
6. Burton M, Pearse D, 2002. Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetic Modification, Functional Foods, and Microorganisms: A Choice Modeling Experiment for Beer. AgBioForum, 5 (2), 51-58. (Pubitemid 38790307)
7. Burton M, Rigby D, Young T, James S, 2001. Consumer Attitudes to Genetically Modified Organisms in Food in the UK. European Review of Agricultural Economics 28 (4), 479-498.
8. Canavari M., Nocella G., Scarpa R., 2005. Stated Willingness to Pay for Organic Fruit and Pesticide Ban. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 11 (3), 107-134.
9. Castillo M., 2009. Zumos y nectares. La marca blanca se va comiendo el mercado. Alimarket, 228,215-230.
10. Darby K., Batte M.T., Ernst S., Roe B., 2008. Descomposing Local: a Conjoint Analysus of Locally Produced Foods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90 (2), 476-486. (Pubitemid 351524220)
11. Gao Z, SchroederT, 2009. Effects of additional quality attributes on consumer willingness-to-pay for food labels. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91 (3), 795-809.
12. Gracia A, Albisu LM, 2001. Food consumption in the European Union: main determinants and country differences. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 17 (4), 469-488. (Pubitemid 33357085)
13. Grunert KG, 2005. Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32 (3), 369-391. (Pubitemid 41442734)
14. Haghiri M., Hobbs J.E., Meaghan L, McNamara L, 2009. Assessing Consumer Preferences for Organically Grown Fresh Fruit and Vegetables in Eastern New Brunswick. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 12 (4), 81-100.
15. Hu W, Hunnemeyer A, Veeman M, Adamowicz W, Srivastava L, 2004. Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31 (3), 389-408. (Pubitemid 40144932)
16. Hu W, Adamovicz WL, Veeman M, 2006a. Labeling context and reference point effects in models of food attribute demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88 (4), 1034-1049. (Pubitemid 44575319)
17. Hu W, Veeman M, Adamowicz W, Gao G, 2006b. Consumers' food choices with voluntary access to genetic modification information. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 585-604. (Pubitemid 44673198)
18. Hu W., Woods T., Bastin S., 2009. Consumer Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for Blueberry Products with Nonconventional Attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41 (1): 47-60.
19. Jaeger SR, Rose JM, 2008. Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 539-565.
20. James S, Burton M, 2003. Consumer Preferences for GM Food and Other Attributes of the Food System. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47 (4), 501-518. (Pubitemid 38978437)
21. Lancaster K, 1966. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74,132-157.
22. Laure B, West G, Gendron C, Lambert R, 2004. Consumer response to functional foods produced by conventional, organic or genetic manipulation. Agribusiness 20 (2), 155-166. (Pubitemid 38707362)
23. Loureiro M.L., McCluskey J.J., Mittelhammer R.C., 2001. Assessing Consumers Preferences for Organic, Eco-labeled, and Regular Apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26 (2), 404-416.
24. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD, 2000. Stated choice methods. Analysis and applications. Cambridge, University Press.
25. Mahé T.G., 2008. A Field Test of the Consistency in Stated Choice Analysis: Case Study on Fair Trade Labelled Bananas. I Workshop on "Valuation methods in agro-food and environmental economics: stated of the art and future challenges in Stated Choice Experiments". Barcelona, 3rd-4th July, 2008.
26. McFadden D, 1974. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In P. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 105-142.
27. Martín V.J., 2009. Evolución de los hábitos de compra y consumo en España 1987-2007, dos décadas del panel de consumo alimentario. Distribucion y Consumo 100, 208-239.
28. Matsumoto S, 2004. Consumers' Responses to Front vs. Back Package GM Labels in Japan. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 2 (5), 1-23.
29. Street, D. and L. Burgess, 2007. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
30. Wessells CR, Johnston RJ, Donath H, 1999. Assessing Consumer Preferences for Eco-labeled Seafood: The Influence of Species, Certifier and Household Attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 1084-1089. (Pubitemid 30174783)
31. Zhang H., Gallardo R.K., McCluskey J.J., Kupferman E.M., Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Treatment-Induced Quality Attributes in Anjou Pears. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35 (1), 105-117.